Skip to main content

Lernen aus Störfällen und Präventionsansätze in der Prozessindustrie

  • Chapter
Human Factors
  • 4858 Accesses

Auszug

Die chemische Industrie sowie der Energiesektor (Atomenergie, Öl- und Gasindustrie) unterscheiden sich v.a. durch ihren Prozesscharakter von anderen Branchen: Eine Reaktion wird angestoßen, die sich ohne weiteres menschliches Zutun weiter fortsetzt und deren Verlauf lediglich überwacht wird. Dabei kann es verzögerte Effekte geben, die für Menschen schlecht einzuschätzen sind und die zu Übersteuerungen führen können, wie dies Dörner et al. anhand von Simulationen wie „Lohhausen“ darstellen konnten (Dörner et al., 1983).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. & Flin, R. (1998). Safety culture: Philosopher’s stone or man of straw?, Work and Stress, 12 (3), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M., Lauche, K. & Flin, R. (2005). Incident command skills in the management of an oil industry drilling incident: A case study, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13 (3), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M., Lauche, K. & Flin, R. (2008). Learning from experience: Incident management team leader training. In J. M. Schraagen (Ed.), Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition. Aldershort: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft-Bednarski, S. & Johnston, K. (1999). Britannia topsides; A low cost, safe and productive North Sea facility. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 3.-6. May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, T. H. L. (1990). The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F. & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen: Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R., Bolté, B. & Jones, D. G. (2003). Designing for situation awareness. An approach to user-centered design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbruch, B., Dubiel, J., Neumann, L. & Raupach, O. (2007). Discussion document for OECD-CCA Workshop on Human Factors in Chemical Accidents and incidents, Potsdam 8–9 May 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. T. (2000). Safety culture maturity model (No. 2000/049 Offshore Technology Report). Edinburgh: Health & Safety Executive/The Keil Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R. (1996). Sitting in the hot seat: Leaders and teams for critical incidents. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., Mearns, K., O’Connor, P. & Bryden, R, (2000). Safety climate: Identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., Slaven, G. & Stewart, K. (1996). Emergency decision making in the offshore oil and gasindustry. Human Factors, 38 (2), 262–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R., Flin, R. & Mearns, K. (2005). Designing and evaluating a human factors investigation tool (HFIT) to improve incident investigation. Safety Science, 43, 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R., Flin, R., Mearns, K. & Fleming, M. T. (1996). Assessing the human factors causes of accidents in the offshore oil industry. Paper presented at the International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans, 9.-12. June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, G. & Künzler, C. (2000). Diagnosis of safety culture in safety management audits. Safety Science, 34, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research. Safety Science, 34, 215–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D. & Leveson, N. (Eds.) (2006). Resilience engineering. Concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künzler, C. (2002). Kompetenzförderliche Sicherheits kultur. Ganzheitliche Gestaltung risikoreicher Arbeitssysteme. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros, L. (2004). Acting under uncertainly. The core-task analysis in ecological study of work. Helsinki: VTT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., Lawrie, M. & Hudson, P. (2006). A framework of understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Safety Science, 44 (6), 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents. Living with high-risk technologies. (2nd edn.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullwitt, T., Mearns, K. Schönherr, S. & Lauche, K. (2007). On manager and supervisor skills to perform safety interventions. Paper presented at the ESREL Safety and Reliability Conference, Stavancer, Norway, 25.-27. June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1987). Generic error-modelling system (GEMS): A cognitive framework for locating common human error forms. In J. Rasumssen, K. Duncan & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 63–83). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvendy, G. (2006). Handbook of human factors (3rd edn.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon, A., Mearns, K. & Flin, R. (2006). Safety and situation awareness in offshore crews. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlström, B., Kettunen, J., Wilpert, B., Maimer, H., Jung, J., Cox, S. et al. (2005). Learn Safel Learning organisations for nuclear safety (No. 2287). Espoo: VTT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilpert, B. & Fahlbruch, B. (Eds.) (2002). System safety. Challenges and pitfalls of Intervention. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilpert, B., Miller, R. & Fahlbruch, B. (1997) SOL: Sicherheit durch Organisationales Lernen. Ein neues Konzept für das Lernen aus Betriebserfahrung. Technische Überwachung, 38 (4), 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. & Luria, G. (2005). Amultilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and grouplevel climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (4), 616–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horn, G., Lauche, K. (2008). Lernen aus Störfällen und Präventionsansätze in der Prozessindustrie. In: Badke-Schaub, P., Hofinger, G., Lauche, K. (eds) Human Factors. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72321-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics