Skip to main content

Exposure Assessment

  • Chapter
Handbook of Epidemiology

Abstract

Accurate exposure assessment is a prerequisite for an efficient study design, more than ever before, because of the increasing challenges that epidemiology has to face to demonstrate low increases in risk, to disentangle mixed potential risk factors in disease causation, and to provide exposure-response relationships for policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlborg UG, Becking GC, Birnbaum LS, Brouwer A, Derks HJGM, Feeley M, Golor G, Hanberg A, Larsen JC, Liem AKD, Safe SH, Schlatter C, Waern F, Younes M, Yrjänheikki E (1994) Toxic equivalency factors for dioxin-like PCBs. Chemosphere 28:1049–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth BE, Richardson MT, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS, Sternfeld B (1999) Accuracy of recall of occupational physical activity by questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 52:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R (1994) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics, vol 21. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke G, Sim M, Fritschi L, Alfred G, Forbes A, Kauppinen T (2001) Comparison of occupational exposure using three different methods: hygiene panel, job exposure matrix (JEM) and self reports. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 16: 84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair A, Zahm SH (1993) Patterns of pesticide use among farmers: implications for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 4:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunekreef B, Noy D, Clausing P (1987) Variability of exposure measurements in environmental epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 125:892–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstyn I, Kromhout H, Kauppinen T, Heikkila P, Boffetta P (2000) Statistical modelling of the determinants of historical exposure to bitumen and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among paving workers. Ann Occup Hyg 44: 54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter DO, Arcaro K, Spink DC (2002) Understanding the human health effects of chemical mixtures. Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 1):25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasan-Taber L, Erickson JB, McBride JW, Nasca PC, Chasan-Taber S, Freedson PS (2002) Reproducibility of a self-administered lifetime physical activity questionnaire among female college alumnae. Am J Epidemiol 155:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee N, Wacholder S (2002) Validation studies: bias, efficiency and exposure assessment. Epidemiology 13:503–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrie JW, Schneider T, Spankie S, Quinn M (1996) A new method for structured, subjective assessments of past concentrations. Occ Hyg 3:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladen BC, Doucet J, Hansen LG (2003) Assessing human polychlorinated biphenyl contamination for epidemiologic studies: lessons from patterns of congener concentrations in Canadians in 1992. Environ Health Perspect 111:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandjean P, Bjerve KS, Weihe P, Steuerwald U (2001) Birthweight in a fishing community: significance of essential fatty acids and marine food contaminants. Int J Epidemiol 30:1272–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heederik D, Attfield M (2000) Characterization of dust exposure for the study of chronic occupational lung disease: A comparison of different exposure assessment strategies. Am J Epidemiol 151:982–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry CJ, Phillips R, Carpanini F, Corton JC, Craig K, Igarashi K, Leboeuf R, Marchant G, Osborn K, Pennie WD, Smith LL, Teta MJ, Vu V (2002) Use of genomics in toxicology and epidemiology: findings and recommendations of a workshop. Environ Health Perspect 110:1047–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines CJ, Selvin S, Samuels SJ, Hammond SK, Woskie SR, Hallock MF, Schenker MB (1995) Hierarchical cluster analysis for exposure assessment of workers in the semiconductor health study. Am J Ind Med 28:713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsing AW (2001) Hormones and prostate cancer: what’s next. Epidemiol Rev 23: 42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljelind I, Rappaport S, Eriksson K, Andersson J, Bergdahl IA, Sunesson AL, Jarvholm B (2003) Exposure assessment of monoterpenes and styrene: a comparison of air sampling and biomonitoring. Occup Environ Med 60:599–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey G, Aronson E (1985) Handbook of social psychology, 3rd edn, vol I. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Longnecker MP, Rogan WJ, Lucier G (1997) The human health effects of DDT (dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane) and PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and an overview of organochlorines in public health. Annu Rev Public Health 18:211–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrail MP, Stewart W, Schwartz BS (1995) Predictors of blood lead levels in organolead manufacturing workers. J Occup Environ Med 37:1224–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nybo Andersen A-M, Olsen J (2002) Do interviewer’s health beliefs and habits modify responses to sensitive questions? A study using data collected from pregnant women by means of computer-assisted telephone interviews. Am J Epidemiol 155:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlee A, Drijver M, Lebret E, Brunekreef B (1996) Chronic respiratory symptoms in children and adults living along streets with high traffic density. Occup Environ Med 53:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlabeln H, Wild P, Schill W, Ahrens W, Jahn I, Bolm-Audorff U, Jöckel K-H (2002) Asbestos fibreyears and lung cancer: a two-phase case-control study with expert exposure assessment. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59:410–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif JS, Burch JB, Nuckols JR, Metzger L, Ellington D, Anger WK (2003) Neurobehavioral effects of exposure to trichloroethylene through a municipal water supply. Environ Res 93:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Samet JM (1995) What can we expect from epidemiologic studies of chemical mixtures? Toxicology 105:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schantz SL, Widholm JJ, Rice DB (2003) Effects of PCB exposure on neuropsychological function in children. Environ Health Perspect 111:357–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schill W, Jöckel K-H, Drescher K, Timm J (1993) Logistic analysis in case-control studies under validation sampling. Biometrika 80:339–352

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schill W, Drescher K (1997) The analysis of case-control studies under validation subsampling: a comparison of four approaches. Statistics in Medicine 16:117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto AM, Fernandez MF, Luizzi MF, Oles-Karasko AS, Sonnenschein C (1997) Developing a marker of exposure to xenoestrogen mixtures in human serum. Environ Health Perspect 105(suppl 3):647–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stürmer T, Thürigen D, Spiegelman D, Blettner M, Brenner H (2002) The performance of methods for correcting measurement error in case-control studies. Epidemiology 13:507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Hurwitz P, McNutt S, McIntosh A, Rosenfeld S (2001) Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires. The Eating at America’s Table Study. Am J Epidemiol 154:1089–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subar AF, Thompson FE, Smith AF, Jobe JB, Ziegler RG, Potischman N, Schatzkin A, Hartman A, Swanson C, Kruse L, Hayes RB, Lewis DR, Harlan LC (1995) Improving food frequency questionnaires: A qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing. J Am Diet Assoc 95:781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S, Bradburn NM (1982) Asking questions. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tielemans E, Heederik D, Burdorf A, Vermeulen R, Veulemans H, Komhout H, Hartog K (1998) Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods. Occup Environ Med 56:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Woord MP, Kromhout H, Barregard L, Jonsson P (1999) Within-day variability of magnetic fields among electic utility workers: Consequences for measurement strategies. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 60:713–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen R, Stewart P, Kromhout H (2002) Dermal exposure assessment in occupational epidemiologic research. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:371–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacholder S, Hartge P, Dosemeci M, Armstrong B (1995) Validation studies using an alloyed gold standard (letter). Am J Epidemiol 141:277

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett WC (1998) Invited commentary: comparison of food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 148:1157–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett WC (1990) Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. In: Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cordier, S., Stewart, P.A. (2005). Exposure Assessment. In: Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I. (eds) Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics