Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confounding and Interaction

  • Chapter
Handbook of Epidemiology

Abstract

All epidemiologic studies are (or should be) based on a particular source population followed over a particular risk period. The goal is usually to estimate the effect of one or more exposures on one or more health outcomes. When we are estimating the effect of a specific exposure on a specific health outcome, confounding can be thought of as a mixing of the effects of the exposure being studied with the effect(s) of other factor(s) on the risk of the health outcome of interest. Interaction can be thought of as a modification, by other factors, of the effects of the exposure being studied on the health outcome of interest, and can be subclassified into two major concepts: biological dependence of effects, also known as synergism; and effect-measure modification, also known as heterogeneity of a measure. Both confounding and interaction can be assessed by stratification on these other factors (i.e. the potential confounders or effect modifiers). The present chapter covers the basic concepts of confounding and interaction and provides a brief overview of analytic approaches to these phenomena. Because these concepts and methods involve far more topics than we can cover in detail, we provide many references to further discussion beyond that in the present handbook, especially to relevant chapters in Modern Epidemiology by Rothman and Greenland (1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong B, White E, Saracci R (1992) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong BG (1998) Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 55:651–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelson O (1978) Aspects on confounding in occupational health epidemiology. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 4:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelson O (1989) Confounding from smoking in occupational epidemiology. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 46:505–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelson O, Steenland K (1988) Indirect methods of assessing the effects of tobacco use in occupational studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 13:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelson O, Flodin U, Hardell L (1982) A comment on the reference series with regard to multiple exposure evaluations in a case-referent study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 8(suppl 1):15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bross IDJ (1967) Pertinency of an extraneous variable. Journal of Chronic Diseases 20:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway H, Waldman GT (1985) Assessing the possible extent of confounding in occupational case-referent studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 11:131–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway H, Pearce N, Kriebel D (2004) Research methods in occupational epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole SR, Hernan MA (2002) Fallibility in estimating direct effects. International Journal of Epidemiology 31:163–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland KT, Checkoway H, McMichael AJ, Holbrook RH (1977) Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology 105:488–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield J, Haenszel W, Hammond EC, Lilienfeld AM, Shimkin MB, Wynder EL (1959) Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22:173–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll R, Peto R (1978) Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 32:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Morris C (1977) Stein’s paradox in statistics. Scientific American 236:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland M, Hui SL (1987) A general approach to analyzing epidemiologic data that contain misclassification errors. Biometrics 43:1001–1012

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Marlow DA, Piacitelli LA, Honchar PA, Sweeney MH, Greife AL, Dill PA, Steenland K, Suruda AJ (1991) Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. New England Journal of Medicine 324:212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders WD, Khoury MJ (1990) Indirect assessment of confounding: graphic description and limits on effect for adjusting for covariates. Epidemiology 1:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1980) The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates. American Journal of Epidemiology 112:564–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1988) Variance estimation for epidemiologic effect estimates under misclassification. Statistics in Medicine 7:745–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1993a) Additive-risk versus additive relative-risk models. Epidemiology 4:32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1993b) Basic problems in interaction assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 101(suppl 4):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1993c) Methods for epidemiologic analyses of multiple exposures: Areview and a comparative study of maximum-likelihood, preliminary testing, and empirical-Bayes regression. Statistics in Medicine 12:717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1996) Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference. Epidemiology 7:498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2000a) An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology 29:722–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2000b) Principles of multilevel modelling. International Journal of Epidemiology 29:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2000c) When should epidemiologic regressions use random coefficients? Biometrics 56:915–921

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2001a) Ecologic versus individual-level sources of confounding in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. International Journal of Epidemiology 30:1343–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2001b) Putting background information about relative risks into conjugate prior distributions. Biometrics 57:663–670

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2003) The impact of prior distributions for uncontrolled confounding and response bias: Acase study of the relation of wire codes and magnetic fields to childhood leukemia. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98: 47–54

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2004a) Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals. International Journal of Epidemiology (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2004b) Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2005) Multiple-bias modeling for observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Kleinbaum D (1983) Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 12:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Maldonado G (1994) The interpretation of multiplicative model parameters as standardised parameters. Statistics in Medicine 13:989–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Neutra RR (1980) Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. International Journal of Epidemiology 9:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Poole C (1988) Invariants and noninvariants in the concept of interdependent effects. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 14:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Robins JM (1985) Confounding and misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology 122:495–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Robins JM (1986) Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. International Journal of Epidemiology 15:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Robins JM (1991) Empirical-Bayes adjustments for multiple comparisons are sometimes useful. Epidemiology 2:244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM (1999a) Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Robins JM, Pearl J (1999b) Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statistical Science 14:29–46

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Schwartzbaum JA, Finkle WD (2000) Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 151:531–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Mitchell AA (2002) Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation. American Journal of Epidemiology 155:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM (2004) A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 15:615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic research. Principles and quantitative methods. Lifetime Learning Publication, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogevinas M, Pearce N, Susser M, Boffetta P (1997) Social inequalities and cancer. IARC Scientific Publications No. 138, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman JS (1977) Causal models and sources of interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology 106:439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriebel D, Zeka A, Eisen EA, Wegman DH (2004) Quantitative evaluation of the effects of uncontrolled confounding by alcohol and tobacco in occupational cancer studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 33:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupper LL, Hogan MD (1978) Interaction in epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:447–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash TL, Fink AK (2003) Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational epidemiologic data. Epidemiology 14:451–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado G, Greenland S (1993) A simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. American Journal of Epidemiology 138:923–936

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JR, Hastrup JL (1996) Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: uncorrelated errors. American Journal of Epidemiology 143:1069–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JR, Hastrup JL (1999) Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: correlated errors. American Journal of Epidemiology 150:88–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS (1974) Confounding and effect-modification. American Journal of Epidemiology 100:350–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS (1982) Causal and preventive interdependence. Elementary principles. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 8:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS (1985) The “case-control” study: valid selection of subjects. Journal of Chronic Diseases 38:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS, Cook EF (1981) Confounding: essence and detection. American Journal of Epidemiology 114:593–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Moolgavkar SH, Venzon DJ (1987) General relative risk regression models for epidemiologic studies. [comment]. American Journal of Epidemiology 126:949–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce N (1988) Multistage modelling of lung cancer mortality in asbestos textile workers. International Journal of Epidemiology 17:747–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce N (1989) Analytical implications of epidemiological concepts of interaction. International Journal of Epidemiology 18:976–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce N, Checkoway H (1988) Case-control studiesusing other diseases as controls: problems of excluding exposure-related diseases. [comment]. American Journal of Epidemiology 127:851–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (2000) Causality: models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips CV (2003) Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors. Epidemiology 14:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM (1989) The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine 8:679–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM (2001) Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference. Epidemiology 12:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Greenland S (1992) Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Greenland S (1994) Adjusting for differential rates of prophylaxis therapy for PCP in high-dose versus low-dose AZT treatment arms in an AIDS randomized trial. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89:737–749

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Morgenstern H (1987) The foundations of confounding in epidemiology. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 14:869–916

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Blevins D, Ritter G, Wulfsohn M (1992) G-estimation of the effect of prophylaxis therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on the survival of AIDS patients. Epidemiology 3:319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ (1976) Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology 104:587–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ (1978) Occam’s razor pares the choice among statistical models. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:347–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ (1990) No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1:43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Walker AM (1980) Concepts of interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology 112:467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Saracci R (1987) The interactions of tobacco smoking and other agents in cancer etiology. Epidemiologic Reviews 9:175–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz DA, Baron EA (1989) Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology 129:1062–1071

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesselman JJ (1978) Assessing effects of confounding variables. American Journal of Epidemiology 99:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesselman JJ (1982) Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Selikoff IJ, Seidman H, Hammond EC (1980) Mortality effects of cigarette smoking among amosite asbestos factory workers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 65:507–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki J, Thomas DC (1981) Biological models and statistical interactions: an example from multistage carcinogenesis. International Journal of Epidemiology 10:383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki J, Wacholder S, Dewar R, Wald L, Begin D, Richardson L, Rosenman K, Gerin M (1988) Smoking and degree of occupational exposure: are internal analyses in cohort studies likely to be confounded by smoking status? American Journal of Industrial Medicine 13:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer A, Zeger SL (1991) On estimating efficacy from clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 10:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenland K, Thun M (1986) Interaction between tobacco smoking and occupational exposures in the causation of lung cancer. Journal of Occupational Medicine 28:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenland K, Beaumont J, Halperin W (1984) Methods of control for smoking in occupational cohort mortality studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 10:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenland K, Bray I, Greenland S, Boffetta P (2000) Empirical Bayes adjustments for multiple results in hypothesis-generating or surveillance studies. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 9:895–903

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DC, Greenland S (1983) The relative efficiencies of matched and independent sample designs for case-control studies. Journal of Chronic Diseases 36:685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DC, Stram D, Dwyer J (1993) Exposure-measurement error: influence on exposure-disease relationships and methods of correction. Annual Review of Public Health 14:69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter SD, Holford TR (1978) Additive, multiplicative, and othermodels for disease risks. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg CR (1993) Toward a clearer definition of confounding. American Journal of Epidemiology 137:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte JS, Greenland S, Kim L-L, Arab L (2000) Multilevel modeling in epidemiology with GLIMMIX. Epidemiology 11:684–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagawa T (1984) Case-control studies: assessing the effects of a confounding factor. Biometrika 71:191–194

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Public Health Research Research School of Public Health, Massey University, Wellington Campus, Private Box 756, Wellington, New Zealand

    Neil Pearce

  2. Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA

    Sander Greenland

  3. Department of Statistics, UCLA College of Letters and Science, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA

    Sander Greenland

Authors
  1. Neil Pearce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sander Greenland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Epidemiological Methods and Ethiologic Research, Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine (BIPS), Linzer Str. 10, 28359, Bremen, Germany

    Wolfgang Ahrens  & Iris Pigeot  & 

  2. Division of Biometrie and Data Management, Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine (BIPS), Linzer Str. 10, 28359, Bremen, Germany

    Wolfgang Ahrens  & Iris Pigeot  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearce, N., Greenland, S. (2005). Confounding and Interaction. In: Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I. (eds) Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation