Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Heterogene Praktiken, variable Kreativitäten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kreativität und Improvisation

Zusammenfassung

Menio Park, New Jersey, Oktober 1879: In einer der gerade neu eingerichteten Werkstätten gelingt es Thomas Alva Edison, verkohlte Bambusfasern in einem evakuierten Glaskolben etwa 40 Stunden leuchten zu lassen. Seit Jahrzehnten hatten sich Bastler, Tüftler, Ingenieure und Techniker an der elektrischen Glühlampe versucht – Lindsay 1835, de Moleyns 1841, Starr 1845, Lodygin 1874, Swan 1878.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Andrus, Roman R. (1968): Creativity: A Function for Computers or Executives?. In: The Journal of Marketing. 32. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri (1907): L’Evolution créatrice. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, Wiebe (1995): Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1976): Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1987): Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, Bruce (1988): Manic Depression: Risk and Creativity. In: Science News. 134. 151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, George P.; Hattery, Lowell H. (1956): Teamwork and Creativity in Research. In: Administrative Science Quarterly. 1. 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, Edward W. (1980): The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robert G. (1983): A Process Model for Industrial New Product Development. In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 30. 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Benjamin (2004): Creativity, Habit, and the Social Products of Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu. In: Sociological Theory. 22. 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Wayne (1955): Variations in Productivity Among Creative Workers. In: The Scientific Monthly. 80. 277–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1922): Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1938): Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni (1982): Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. In: Research Policy. 11. 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Guy, Paul; Hall, Stuart; Janes, Linda; Mackay, Hugh; Negus, Keith (1997): Doing Cultural Studies: the Story of the Sony Walkman: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrecht, Jörg (2002): Die Kreativität der Praxis. Überlegungen zum Wandel von Habitusformationen. In: Ebrecht, Jörg und Hillebrandt, Frank (Hrsg.): Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis. Erklärungskraft – Anwendung – Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 225–241.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Christopher (1987): Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu; Karnøe, Peter (2003): Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship. In: Research Policy. 32. 277– 300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. (2004): From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems. Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. In: Research Policy. 33. 897–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. (2005): Technological Transitions and Systems Innovations: a Coevolutionary and Socio-technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, Joy P. (1950): Creativity. In: American Psychologist. 9. 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, Edward (1987): Creativity and Mental Illness. In: British Medical Journal. 295. 1587–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, Jonathan D.; Macrosson, W. D. Keith (1990): Creativity Training: An Assessment of a Novel Approach. In: Journal of Business and Psychology. 5. 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P. (1979): The Electrification of America. The System Builders. In: Technology and Culture. 20. 124–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P. (1983): Networks of Power. Electrification in Western Society, 1880 – 1930, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William (1890): The Principles of Psychology: New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joas, Hans (1992): Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Stephen; Rosenberg, Nathan (1986): An Overview of Innovation. In: Ralph Laudan und Rosenberg, Nathan (Hrsg.): The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowol, Uli; Krohn, Wolfgang (2000): Innovation und Vernetzung. Die Konzeption der Innovationsnetzwerke. In: Weyer, Johannes (Hrsg.): Soziale Netzwerke. Konzepte und Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Netzwerkforschung. München: Oldenbourg. 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1955): Current Studies of the Decision Process: Automation versus Creativity. In: The Western Political Quarterly. 8. 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1987): Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (2006): Ethnographie einer Hochtechnologie: Das Pariser Projekt ‘Aramis’ eines automatischen U-Bahn-Systems. In: Rammert, Werner und Schubert, Cornelius (Hrsg.): Technografie: Zur Mikrosoziologie der Technik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidique, Modesto A.; Zirger, Billie Joe (1985): The New Product Learning Cycle. In: Research Policy. 14. 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Bernd; Mayntz, Renate (1991): Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George Herbert (1934): Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Jacob Levy (1946): Psychodrama. New York, NY: Beacon House. Moreno, Jacob Levy (1955): Theory of Spontaneity-Creativity. In: Sociometry. 18. 105– 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Douglas N. (1953): Creativity Today: A Constructive Analytic Review of Certain Philosophical and Psychological Work. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 12.. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R.; Winter, Sidney G. (1977): In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation. In: Research Policy. 6. 36–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, Greg R.; Cummings, Anne (1996): Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. In: The Academy of Management Journal. 39. 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortman, Günther; Sydow, Jörg (1999): Grenzmanagement in Unternehmensnetzwerken: Theoretische Zugange. In: Der Betriebswirt. 59. 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, Nelly E. J. (2000): The Co-construction of Contraceptive Technologies and Users. In: Ann A. R. Saetnan; Nelly E. J. Oudshoorn und Kirejczyk,Martha (Hrsg.): Bodies of Technology. Women’s Involvement in Reproductive Medicine. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, Nelly E. J.; Pinch, Trevor J. (Hrsg.): (2003): How Users Matter: The Co- Construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner (1997): Innovationen im Netz. Neue Zeiten für technische Innovationen: heterogen verteilt und interaktiv vernetzt. In: Soziale Welt. 48. 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas (2006): Das hybride Subjekt. Eine Theorie der Subjektkulturen von der bürgerlichen Moderne zur Postmoderne. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, Oliver L. (1924): A Monism of Creative Behavior. In: The Journal of Philosophy. 21. 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Ronald E.; Rogers, Everett M. (1980): Reinvention in the Innovation Process. In: Science Communication. 1. 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, Arie; Kemp, René (1998): Technological change. In: Rayner, Steve und Malone, Elizabeth J. (Hrsg.): Human Choice and Climate Change. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. 327–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, Arie; Schot, Johan (2002): Identifying Loci for Influencing the Dynamics of Technological Development. In: Sørensen, Knuth H. und Williams, Robin (Hrsg.): Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy. Concepts, Spaces and Tools. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. (1983): Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Susanne K.; Werle, Raimund (1997): Coordinating Technology. Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J W. (1913): The Pessimism of Creative Evolution. In: Mind. 22. 344–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, William E. (1965): The Creative Individual. In: The Academy of Management Journal. 8. 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirm A. (1949): Concept, Tests, and Energy of Spontaneity-Creativity. In: Sociometry. 12. 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, Irvin; White, David E. (1976): Creativity Techniques: Toward Improvement of the Decision Process. In: The Academy of Management Review. 1. 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Donald W.; Berry, Paul C.; Block, Clifford H. (1958): Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking?. In: Administrative Science Quarterly. 3. 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, Michael L. und Rosenkopf, Lori (1992): Organizational Determinants of Technological Change. Toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution. In: Research in Organizational Behavior. 14. 311–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Poel, Ibo (2000): On the Role of Outsiders in Technical Development. In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 12. 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lente, Harro (1993): Promising Technology: The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter (1995): Soziologie der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Robert W. (1994): Genius and Madness? A Quasi-Experimental Test of the Hypothesis That Manic-Depression Increases Creativity. In: Psychological Science. 5. 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, Arnold (2001): Unternehmensnetzwerke. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Richard W.; Sawyer, John E.; Griffin, Ricky W. (1993): Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. In: The Academy of Management Review. 18. S. 293– 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, Steve (1991): Configuring the User. The Case of Usability Trials. In: Law, John (Hrsg.): A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge. 58–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, Sally (2003): Non-users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Technologies. In: Oudshoorn, Nelly E. J. und Pinch, Trevor (Hrsg.): How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Deutschland

    Dr. phil. Jan-Hendrik Passoth

Authors
  1. Dr. phil. Jan-Hendrik Passoth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Theaterstr. 96, Aachen, 52062, Germany

    Udo Göttlich

  2. Ulmenstr. 3, Düsseldorf, 40476, Germany

    Ronald Kurt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Passoth, JH. (2012). Heterogene Praktiken, variable Kreativitäten. In: Göttlich, U., Kurt, R. (eds) Kreativität und Improvisation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18989-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18989-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18245-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18989-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation