Skip to main content

Gendering in organizations: Lessons from the prison and other iron cages

  • Chapter
Gender — from Costs to Benefits
  • 700 Accesses

Abstract

Outside of criminology and the rare studies of total institutions in the organizational literature, the prison has held little interest for sociologists. Certainly, it has never been a topic of mainstream research on work and organizations. By choosing the prison as a case study for understanding the processes through which work and work organizations themselves are gendered, I have made a seemingly unconventional choice, one that places my research far afield of the traditional realm of organization studies. What I hope to demonstrate, however, is that the prison - a quite literal iron cage - has much to tell us about the dynamics of gender in cages of the more figurative Weberian variety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1990): Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In: Gender & Society 4. pp. 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (1992): From sex roles to gendered institutions. In: Contemporary Sociology 21(5). pp. 565–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A.J./P.M. Harrison (2001): Prisoners in 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved May 22, 2003 from http://http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/p00.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1988): The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D.M. (1997): Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. In: Gender & Society 11. pp. 796–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D.M. (1999): Cat fights and gang fights: Preference for work in a male-dominated organization. In: The Sociological Quarterly 40 (3). pp. 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D.M. (2000): The epistemology of the gendered organization. In: Gender & Society 14 (3). pp. 418–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D.M. (2003): At work in the iron cage: The prison as gendered organization. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (1996): Sentencing women to prison: Equality without justice. In: Race, class and gender in criminology: The intersection. Eds. M.D. Schwartz/D. Milovanovic. New York: Garland Press, pp. 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockbum, C. (1983): Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockbum, C. (1985): Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockbum, C. (1991): In the way of women: Men’s resistance to sex equality in organizations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W.C. (1991): Legal issues and the employment of women. In: Change, challenge, and choices: Women’s role in modem corrections. Ed. J.B. Morton. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association. pp. 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. (1987): Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K.E. (1984): The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979): Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, A./R. Pringle (1984): Gender at work. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giallombardo, R. (1966): Society of women: A study of a women’s prison. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. Russell (1983): The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurik, N.C. (1985): An officer and a lady: Organizational barriers to women working as correctional officers in men’s prisons. In: Social Problems 32 (4). pp. 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurik, N.C. (1988): Striking a balance: Female correctional officers, gender role stereotypes, and male prisons. In: Sociological Inquiry 58 (3). pp. 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. Moss (1977): Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. Fox (1985): Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, R. (1991): Selling Hamburgers and selling insurance: Gender, work, and identity in interactive service jobs. In: Gender & Society 5 (2). pp. 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, R. (1993): Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.Y. (2001): ‘Mobilizing masculinities’: Women’s experiences of men at work. In: Organization 8 (4). pp. 587–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.Y./D. Collinson (2002): ‘Over the pond and across the water’: Developing the field of ‘gendered organizations’. In: Gender, Work & Organization 9. pp. 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.A. (2000): Sex & surveillance: Gender, privacy & the sexualization of power in prison. In: George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 10 (2). pp. 291–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollilainen, M./J. Rothschild (2001): Can self-managing teams be truly cross-functional?: Gender barriers to a ‘new’ division of labor. In: Research in the Sociology of Work 10. pp. 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. (1988): The reproduction of social control: A study of prison workers at San Quentin. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. (1998): In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J.L. (1995): Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock-Byme, J.M. (1986): Sex and supervision: Guarding male and female inmates. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. (1989): Secretaries talk: Sexuality, power, and work. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. (1993): Male secretaries. In: Doing “women’s work”: Men in nontraditional occupations. Ed. C.L. Williams. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 128–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B.F./I. Padavic (1988): Supervisors as gatekeepers: Male supervisors’ response to women’s integration in plant jobs. In: Social Problems 35 (5). pp. 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1988): Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. In: J. Scott: Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.E. (1979): A sociology for women. In: The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge. Eds. J.A. Sherman/E.T. Beck. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 135–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (Bureau of Justice Statistics) (1998): Census of state and federal adult correctional facilities. (ICPSR study #6593). Retrieved May 22, 2003 from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu:8080/ICPSR-STUDY/06953.xml.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C./D. Zimmerman (1987): Doing gender. In: Gender & Society 1. pp. 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.L. (1988): Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. In: Social Problems 35 (1). pp. 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.L. (1989): Gender differences at work: Women and men in nontraditional occupations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.L. (1992): The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. In: Social Problems 39. pp. 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.L. (1995): Still a man’s world: Men who do “women’s” work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, L.E. (1986): Women guarding men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, L.E. (1987): How women reshape the prison guard role. In: Gender & Society 1 (4). pp. 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ursula Pasero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Westdeutscher Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Britton, D.M. (2003). Gendering in organizations: Lessons from the prison and other iron cages. In: Pasero, U. (eds) Gender — from Costs to Benefits. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80475-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80475-4_10

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-14061-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80475-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics