Skip to main content

Teaching CGA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Abstract

Teaching comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a demanding task which encompasses several levels of difficulty. These include conveying knowledge on the importance of both communication with older persons and technical skills. In this chapter, minimum geriatric competencies needed to perform the CGA as well as methods of design, plan and evaluation of teaching are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hafner K (2016) As population ages, where are the geriatricians? The New York Times, New York. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/26/health/where-are-the-geriatricians.html?_r=0

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masud T, Blundell A, Gordon AL, Mulpeter K, Roller RE, Singler K, Goeldlin A, Stuck A (2014) European undergraduate curriculum in geriatric medicine developed using an international modified Delphi technique. Age Ageing 43:695–702

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Association for Medical Education in Europe and World Federation for Medical Education. Statement on the Bologna Process and Medical Education, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zunic L, Donev D (2016) Bologna model of medical education—utopia or reality. DILEMMAS—Mater Sociomed 28:316–319

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman LN, Wiecha J, Hoffman M, Levine SA (2008) Teaching geriatric assessment: use of a hybrid method in a family medicine clerkship. Fam Med 40(10):721–725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chenot JF (2009) Undergraduate medical education in Germany. German Medical Science GMS 7:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolb GF (2005) Survey of the German geriatrics society on the academic situation, student education and the state of further training. Eur J Geriatrics 7:239–248

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benner P (1984) From novice to expert. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bloom B (1964) A handbook of educational objectives. The cognitive domain. McKay, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bowen JL (2006) Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 355:2217–2225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spilsbury M (1995) Measuring the effectiveness of training. IES, Brighton, p 12. Fig. 3.1

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller GE (1990) Assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65(9):S63–S67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM (2006) The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 81:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Keefe M, Henderson A, Chick R (2017) Defining a set of common interprofessional learning competencies for health profession students. Med Teach 39(5):463–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bombeke K, Symons L, Vermeire E, Debaene L, Schol S, De Winter B, Van Royen P (2012) Patient-centredness from education to practice: the “lived” impact of communication skills training. Med Teach 34:e338–e348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpenter CR, Shelton E, Fowler S, Suffoletto B, Platts-Mills TF, Rothman RE, Hogan TM (2015) Risk factors and screening instruments to predict adverse outcomes for undifferentiated older emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 22:1–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Halperin EC (2010) Preserving the humanities in medical education. Med Teach 32:76–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Braude P, Reedy G, Dasgupta D, Dimmock V, Jaye P, Birns J (2015) Evaluation of a simulation training programme for geriatric medicine. Age Ageing 44:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO (2016) Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med 31:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pilotto A, Ferrucci L, Franceschi M, D'Ambrosio LP, Scarcelli C, Cascavilla L, Paris F, Placentino G, Seripa D, Dallapiccola B, Leandro G (2008) Development and validation of a multidimensional prognostic index for one-year mortality from comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. Rejuvenation Res 11(1):151–161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Singler K, Roth T, Beck S, Cunningham M, Gosch M (2016) Development and initial evaluation of a point-of-care educational app on medical topics in orthogeriatrics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:65–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wernier RM, van Rossum E, van Velthuijsen E, Mulder WJ, Schols JM, Kempen GI (2016) Validity, reliability, and feasibility of tools to identify frail older patients in inpatient hospital care: a systematic review. J Nutr Health Aging 20:218–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Polidori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roller, R.E., Polidori, M.C., Singler, K. (2018). Teaching CGA. In: Pilotto, A., Martin, F. (eds) Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Practical Issues in Geriatrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62503-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62503-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62502-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62503-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics