Skip to main content

A Study of Speech Versus Braille and Large Print of Mathematical Expressions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9758))

Abstract

Several systems have been developed that allow mathematical expressions to be spoken and navigated. This paper describes studies involving the latest revision of the most widely used system: MathPlayer 4. This version includes features to allow navigation of mathematical expressions. Students with blindness or low vision used NVDA + MathPlayer to read Microsoft Word documents with math problems in them. The results were compared with the same students reading similar documents using their favorite modality (braille or large print). The results showed that speech augmented with navigation resulted in similar comprehension rates compared to when students used their preferred modality. This is an important finding because electronic documents are often available in situations where braille or large print documents are not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not ambiguous because “over” is only used when the denominator is simple.

  2. 2.

    Nemeth refreshable braille is also supported by NVDA + MathPlayer, but the study did not allow students to use this feature.

References

  1. Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 81 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raman, T.V.: Audio system for technical readings. PhD thesis, Ithaca, NY, USA. UMI Order No. GAX95-11869 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, A.D., Harling, P.A., Stevens, R.D.: Access to mathematics for visually disabled students through multimodal interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12, 47–92 (1997). doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1201&2_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillan, D.J., Barraza, P., Karshmer, A.I., Pazuchanics, S.: Cognitive analysis of equation reading: application to the development of the math genie. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Burger, D. (eds.) ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118, pp. 630–637. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira, H., Freitas, D.: AudioMath-using MathML for speaking mathematics. Presented at XML: Aplicacoes e Tecnologias Associadas, Braga, Portugal (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soiffer, N.: Browser-independent accessible math. In: Proceedings of the 12th Web for All Conference (W4A 2015), Article 28, 3 p. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015). doi:10.1145/2745555.2746678

  7. Sorge, V., Chen, C., Raman, T.V., Tseng, D.: Towards making mathematics a first class citizen in general screen readers. In: Proceedings of 11th Web for All Conference (W4A 2014), Article 40, 10 p. (2014). doi:10.1145/2596695.2596700

  8. Science Accessibility Net. ChattyInfty, the Version 3 Series Manual (2014). http://www.sciaccess.net/en/ChattyInfty/ChattyInfty3_Eng_Manual.pdf

  9. Frankel, L., Brownstein, B,, Soiffer, N.: Navigable, customizable TTS for algebra. J. Technol. Persons Disabil. 1 [22] (2013) http://scholarworks.csun.edu/handle/10211.3/121942

  10. Frankel, L., Brownstein, B., Soiffer, N.: Expanding Audio Access to Mathematics Expressions by Students with Visual Impairments via MathML. To be published in ETS Research Report Series

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study portion of the grant was carried out by Lois Frankel and Beth Brownstein at ETS. I am very thankful for their expertise in designing the study questions and hard work in getting IRB approval, lining up the students, and evaluating the results. Some tutorial material and student recruitment was carried out by Stephen Noble.

I had many late night discussions with Sina Bahram about how navigation should work. Many ideas were discussed and rejected until we came to the current design. The design was very much a joint effort.

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R324A110355 to the Educational Testing Service and Design Science. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Soiffer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soiffer, N. (2016). A Study of Speech Versus Braille and Large Print of Mathematical Expressions. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41263-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41264-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics