Skip to main content

From UCD to HCD and Beyond. Conciliating the Human Aims Between Philosophy and Design Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies (HCII 2020)

Abstract

User-Centered Design (UCD) is defined as both design philosophy and process. Current education in UCD and Human-Centered Design (HCD) mainly focuses on teaching the process and set of specific UCD methods. Although HCD emphasizes on human factors, both forget the philosophical approach of the human being and how they interact with the environment. This paper presents the design, implementation and evaluation of a university-level course that broadens the traditional educational perspective of UCD and HCD. The course has been carried out during 5 semesters in a university-level Digital Design degree where 500 students have participated. During this period, the course design proposal has been evaluated and improvements were made, iteratively. The academic satisfaction surveys show significant results in relation to the course design. Learners find contents interesting and useful. One of the most interesting findings is that students explicitly highlight a change of mindset about design and its values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.sigchi.org.

  2. 2.

    www.uoc.edu.

References

  1. Lowdermilk, T.: User-Centered Design: A Developer’s Guide to Building User-Friendly Applications. O’Reilly, Beijing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas,V., Remy, C., Bates, O.: The limits of HCD: reimagining the anthropocentricity of ISO 9241-210. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits (LIMITS’17), New York, USA pp. 85–92. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ormandjieva, O., Pitula, K., Mansura, C.: Integrating UCD within an agile software development process in an educational setting. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Larusdottir, M., Roto, V., Stage, J., Lucero, A.: Get realistic!-UCD course design and evaluation. In: Bogdan, C., Kuusinen, K., Lárusdóttir, M.K., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) HCSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 11262, pp. 15–30. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05909-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Churchill, E.F., Bowser, A., Preece, J.: The future of HCI education: a flexible, global, living curriculum. Interact. 23(2), 70–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hewett, T.T., et al.: ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. St-Cyr, O., MacDonald, C.M., Churchill, E.F., Preece, J.J., Bowser, A.: Developing a community of practice to support global HCI education. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Churchill, E., Preece, J., Bowser, A.: Developing a Living HCI Curriculum to Support a Global Community. In: CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’14). ACM, New York, USA, pp. 135–138. ACM (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559236

  9. Wilcox, L., DiSalvo, B., Henneman, D., Wang, Q.: Design in the HCI classroom: setting a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 871–883 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Council, D.: The design process: what is the double diamond. The Design Council (2015). https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond

  11. Beux, J., Bellei, E., Brock, L., Bertoletti, A.C., Hölbig, C.: Agile design process with user-centered design and user experience in web interfaces: a systematic literature review. Lat. Am. J. Comput. Fac. Syst. Eng. Escuela Politécnica Nac. Quito-Ecuador 5(2), 53–60 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Felker, C., Slamova, R., Davis, J.: Integrating UX with scrum in an undergraduate software development project. In: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’12). ACM, New York, USA, pp. 301–306. ACM (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157226

  13. McLuhan, M.: Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peirce, C.S.: The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Electronic edn. InteLex Corporation, Charlottesville, VA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Määttänen, P.: Mind in Action. SAPERE, vol. 18. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17623-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Määttänen, P.: Pragmatist semiotics as a framework for design research. In: S. Pizzorato, A. Arruda, & D. De Moraes (eds.), Design + Research: Proceedings of the Politechnico di Milano Conference, Politechnico di Milano, Milano, pp. 70–73 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gondomar, R.: Pragmatic experience of digital media and environments. Hipertext.net: Revista Académica sobre Documentación Digital y Comunicación Interactiva, 17: The Digital Future of Facts. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona (2018). https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2018.i17.03

  18. Dewey, J.: Experience and Education. Touchstone, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dewey, J.: Democracy and education. Pennsylvania State University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Habermas, J.: Communication and The Evolution of Society. Beacon, Boston (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krippendorff, K.: Propositions of human-centeredness; a philosophy for design. In: D. Durling & K. Friedman (eds.), Doctoral education in design: Foundations for the future: Proceedings of the conference held 8–12 July 2000, La Clusaz, France, Staffordshire University Press, Staffordshire (UK) pp. 55–63 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krippendorff, K.: Intrinsic motivation and human-centered design. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 5(1), 43–72 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922031000086717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goodman, N.: Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett, Indianapolis [etc.] (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Noveck, I.A., Sperber, D.: Experimental Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press, Boston (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gibson, J.J.: The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. George Allen & Unwin, London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Papanek, V.: Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Thames & Hudson, London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dreyfuss, H.: Designing for People. Allworth Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of knowing. Springer-Verlag, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson, H.G., Stolterman, E.: The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. The MIT Press, Cambridge [etc.] (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Buurman, G.M.: Total Interaction: Theory and Practice of a New Paradigm for the Design Disciplines. Birkhäuser, Basel [etc.] (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vaughan, L.: Practice Based Design Research. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, London (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Saikaly, F.: Approaches to design research: towards the designerly way. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Design System Evolution. Hochschule fur kunste Bremen, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heft, H.: Ecological Psychology in Context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James’s Radical Empiricism. L. Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J. (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. De Bonte, A., Fletcher, D.: Scenario-Focused Engineering: A Toolbox for Innovation and Customer-Centricity. Microsoft Press, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lahire, B.: L’homme Pluriel: Les Ressorts De L’action. Nathan, Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hennessey, J., Papanek, V.: Nomadic Furniture 1. Pantheon, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hennessey, J., Papanek, V.: Nomadic Furniture 2. Pantheon, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jones, J.C.: Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. John Wiley & Sons, New York [etc.] (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Newman, D.: The Process of Design Squiggle (2009). https://thedesignsquiggle.com/

  42. Colborne, G.: Simple and Usable: Web, Mobile, and Interaction Design. New Riders, Berkeley, CA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia-Lopez, C., Tesconi, S., Mor, E.: Designing design resources: from contents to tools. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11566, pp. 87–100. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Gondomar, R., Mor, E.: Cuaderno de Diseño Centrado en las Personas. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Park, J.H., Choi, H.J.: Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(4), 207–217 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Balasooriya, Isuru., Mor, Enric, Rodríguez, M.Elena: Understanding user engagement in digital education. In: Zaphiris, Panayiotis, Ioannou, Andri (eds.) LCT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10925, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enric Mor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gondomar, R., Mor, E. (2020). From UCD to HCD and Beyond. Conciliating the Human Aims Between Philosophy and Design Education. In: Stephanidis, C., Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Rau, PL.P., Moallem, A., Rauterberg, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12423. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60113-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60114-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics