Skip to main content

In the Passenger Seat: Differences in the Perception of Human vs. Automated Vehicle Control and Resulting HMI Demands of Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Automated Driving and In-Vehicle Experience Design (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12212))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the role change from driver to passenger provoked by driving automation, human factors such as a pleasant driving experience are considered important for a broad system acceptance and usage. However, allocating vehicle control to an automated system has been shown to raise safety concerns among potential users, and to be perceived differently by individuals, e.g. based on their initial trust in the system. To examine both constraints, we compared the effects of human versus fully automated vehicle control on the driving experience (perceived safety, understanding, driving comfort, driving enjoyment) of passengers with lower versus higher trust in driving automation. Additionally, we compared both groups’ acceptance of automated driving and system design requirements. From the passenger seat of a driving simulator, 50 participants experienced two randomly ordered drives with identical maneuver execution along an identical test track: a fully automated drive and a manual drive with a human driver. Based on questionnaire ratings before driving, the sample was divided into 26 lower trust participants and 24 higher trust participants. Automated vehicle control was rated as less pleasant than human vehicle control regarding all aspects of driving experience. In addition, perceived safety and driving comfort were positively affected by higher trust. User requirements regarding a pleasant automated driving experience concerned information presentation, but also driving style adjustments. Lower trust participants reported a lower system acceptance and higher need for information during driving than higher trust participants. These results emphasize the importance of a transparent and individually adaptable design of automated driving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ERTRAC: Automated Driving Roadmap (2017). http://www.ertrac.org/uploads/documentsearch/id48/ERTRAC_Automated_Driving_2017.pdf

  2. Chan, C.-Y.: Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 6(3), 208–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nordhoff, S., van Arem, B., Happee, R.: A conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless vehicles. Transp. Res. Rec. 2602, 60–67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3141/2602-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SAE International: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems (2018). www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806

  5. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A.: Keep the driver in control: automating automobiles of the future. Appl. Ergon. 53(Part B), 389–395 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engelbrecht, A.: Fahrkomfort und Fahrspaß bei Einsatz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen [Driving Comfort and Enjoyment when Using Driver Assistance Systems]. Disserta-Verlag, Hamburg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Strauch, C., et al.: Real autonomous driving from a passenger’s perspective: two experimental investigations using gaze behaviour and trust ratings in field and simulator. Transp. Res. Part F 66, 15–28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraedrich, E., Lenz, B.: Societal and individual acceptance of autonomous driving. In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H. (eds.) Autonomous Driving, pp. 621–640. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia (No. UMTRI-2014-30). The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (2014). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/109433/103139.pdf

  10. Wolf, I.: The interaction between humans and autonomous agents. In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H. (eds.) Autonomous Driving, pp. 103–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mühl, C., Strauch, C., Grabmaier, C., Reithinger, S., Huckauf, A., Baumann, M.: Get ready for being chauffeured: Passenger’s preferences and trust while being driven by human and automation. Hum. Fact. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819872893

  12. Constantin, D., Nagi, M., Mazilescu, C.A.: Elements of discomfort in vehicles. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 143, 1120–1125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartwich, F., Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: Driving comfort, enjoyment, and acceptance of automated sriving - effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics 61(8), 1017–1032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Krems, J.F.: Der Einfluss von Fahrermerkmalen auf den erlebten Fahrkomfort im hochautomatisierten Fahren. [Effects of driver characteristics on the perceived driving comfort in highly automated driving.] at - Automatisierungstechnik 65(7), 512–521 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2016-0130

  15. Hartwich, F., Witzlack, C., Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: The first impression counts - a combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F 65, 522–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauerfeind, K., Stephan, A., Hartwich, F., Othersen, I., Hinzmann, S., Bendewald, L.: Analysis of potentials of an HMI-concept concerning conditional automated driving for system-inexperienced vs. system-experienced users. In: de Waard, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2017 Annual Conference (2017). http://www.hfes-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Bauerfeind2017.pdf

  17. Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Schleinitz, K., Krems, J.F., Othersen, I., Petermann-Stock, I.: What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. 7. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, München (2015). 25.-26 November 2015. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.2462.6007

  18. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse. Abuse. Hum. Factors 39(2), 230–253 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46(1), 50–80 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Körber, M.: Theoretical development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation. In: Proceedings 20th Triennial Congress of the IEA. Springer (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., De Waard, D.: A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transp. Res. Part C 5(1), 1–10 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis. FQS Forum: Qualit. Soc. Res. 1(2) (2000). http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204

  23. Drewitz, U., et al.: Automation ohne Unsicherheit: Vorstellung des Förderprojekts AutoAkzept zur Erhöhung der Akzeptanz automatisierten Fahrens. [Automation without uncertainty: Introducing the research projekt AutoAkzept for enhancing the acceptance of automated driving.] In VDI (Ed.). Mensch-Maschine-Mobilität 2019. Der (Mit-) Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert!? VDI-Berichte 2360, pp. 1–19. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf (2019). ISBN: 978-3-18-092360-4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the research project AutoAkzept, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI) under grant no. 16AVF2126E. We would like to thank the professorship of Ergonomics and Innovation Management of Chemnitz University of Technology for renting out their driving simulator for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Hartwich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hartwich, F., Schmidt, C., Gräfing, D., Krems, J.F. (2020). In the Passenger Seat: Differences in the Perception of Human vs. Automated Vehicle Control and Resulting HMI Demands of Users. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Automated Driving and In-Vehicle Experience Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50523-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50523-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50522-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50523-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics