Skip to main content

Another Week at the Office (AWATO) – An Interactive Serious Game for Threat Modeling Human Factors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12210))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Another Week at the Office (AWATO) is serious game aimed to educate users about threat modeling to help them and/or security analysts identify human factor related threats. AWATO offers an interactive experience where players assume the role of a security analyst where they must observe characters within an office, monitor their emails and phone calls, and identify concerning behavior (e.g. writing passwords on post-it notes).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/dbir/.

  2. 2.

    The Weakest Link”, n.d., https://www.isdecisions.com/user-security-awareness-game/.

  3. 3.

    Osmotic Studios, 2016, https://store.steampowered.com/app/491950/.

  4. 4.

    Exosyphen studios, 2011, https://store.steampowered.com/app/70120/Hacker_Evolution_Duality/.

  5. 5.

    https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/dbir/.

  6. 6.

    www.unrealengine.com.

  7. 7.

    https://syntystore.com/products/polygon-city-pack.

  8. 8.

    https://syntystore.com/products/polygon-office-pack.

  9. 9.

    https://www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/en-US/product/lowpoly-stylized-office-pack.

  10. 10.

    https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/dbir/.

  11. 11.

    The emails were created within an excel spreadsheet and implemented into the game via Blueprint scripts in the Unreal Engine.

References

  1. Alberts, C.J., Behrens, S.G., Pethia, R.D., Wilson, W.R.: Operationally critical threat, asset, and vulnerability evaluation (octave) framework, version 1.0. Technical report, Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA Software Engineering Inst (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cranor, L.F.: A framework for reasoning about the human in the loop (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dupont, G.: The dirty dozen errors in maintenance. In: The 11th Symposium on Human Factors in Maintenance and Inspection: Human Error in Aviation Maintenance (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferro, L.S.: Keep your attackers close, but your users closer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Floyd, D., Portnow, J.: Tangential learning: How games can teach us while we play. Extra Credits (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hendrix, M., Al-Sherbaz, A., Bloom, V.: Game based cyber security training: are serious games suitable for cyber security training? Int. J. Serious Games 3(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henshel, D., Sample, C., Cains, M., Hoffman, B.: Integrating cultural factors into human factors framework and ontology for cyber attackers. In: Nicholson, D. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors in Cybersecurity. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 501, pp. 123–137. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41932-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogarth, R.M., Lejarraga, T., Soyer, E.: The two settings of kind and wicked learning environments. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24(5), 379–385 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Howard, M., LeBlanc, D.: Writing Secure Code. Pearson Education, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hussain, S., Kamal, A., Ahmad, S., Rasool, G., Iqbal, S.: Threat modelling methodologies: a survey. Sci. Int. (Lahore) 26(4), 1607–1609 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Irvine, C.E., Thompson, M.F., Allen, K.: CyberCIEGE: gaming for information assurance. IEEE Secur. Priv. 3(3), 61–64 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mancuso, V.F., Strang, A.J., Funke, G.J., Finomore, V.S.: Human factors of cyber attacks: a framework for human-centered research. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, pp. 437–441. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marrella, A., Ferro, L.S., Catarci, T.: An approach to identifying what has gone wrong in a user interaction. In: Lamas, D., Loizides, F., Nacke, L., Petrie, H., Winckler, M., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) INTERACT 2019. LNCS, vol. 11748, pp. 361–370. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mozelius, P., Fagerström, A., Söderquist, M.: Motivating factors and tangential learning for knowledge acquisition in educational games. Electron. J. e-Learn. 15(4), 343–354 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagarajan, V., Huang, D.: Secure web referral service. In: The International Conference on Information Network 2012, pp. 53–58. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nobles, C.: Botching human factors in cybersecurity in business organizations. HOLISTICA J. Bus. Public Admin. 9(3), 71–88 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parsons, K., McCormac, A., Butavicius, M., Ferguson, L.: Human factors and information security: individual, culture and security environment. Technical report, Defence Science and Technology Organisation Edinburgh (Australia) Command\(\ldots \) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reason, J.: The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Saitta, P., Larcom, B., Eddington, M.: Trike v1 methodology document. Draft, work in progress (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shostack, A.: Threat Modeling: Designing for Security. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sosonkin, M.: Octave: operationally critical threat, asset and vulnerability evaluation. Polytechnic University, April 2005

    Google Scholar 

  22. UcedaVelez, T., Morana, M.M.: Risk Centric Threat Modeling. Wiley Online Library, Hoboken (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Vieane, A., Funke, G., Gutzwiller, R., Mancuso, V., Sawyer, B., Wickens, C.: Addressing human factors gaps in cyber defense. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 60, pp. 770–773. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Young, H., van Vliet, T., van de Ven, J., Jol, S., Broekman, C.: Understanding human factors in cyber security as a dynamic system. In: Nicholson, D. (ed.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 593, pp. 244–254. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60585-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lauren S. Ferro or Francesco Sapio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferro, L.S., Sapio, F. (2020). Another Week at the Office (AWATO) – An Interactive Serious Game for Threat Modeling Human Factors. In: Moallem, A. (eds) HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12210. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50308-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50309-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics