Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12199))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Methodologies are required to enable the active translation of ethical issues pertaining to the human and social dimensions of new technologies, in a manner that considers the diversity of practices across research and innovation and commercial research projects. This paper presents a new methodology for embedding ethics assessment in human machine interaction (HMI)/human factors (HF) design and evaluation activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elkington, J.: Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business, ISBN 9780865713925. OCLC 963459936. Capstone, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephanidis, C.C., et al.: Seven HCI grand challenges. Int. J. Hum.– Comput. Interact. 35(14), 1229–1269 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. European Commission: Ethics for researchers. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/ethics-forresearchers_en.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  4. Geoghegan-Quinn, M.: Responsible Research & Innovation. European Union Publications Office, Brussels (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Capurro, R.: Digital ethics. In: The Academy of Korean Studies (ed.): Civilization and Peace. Academy of Korean Studies 2010, Korea, pp. 203–214 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sollie, P.: Ethics, technology development and uncertainty: an outline for any future ethics of technology. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 5(4), 293–306 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Heidegger, M.: The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, 6th edn. Harper & Row, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fry, T.: Becoming Human by Design. Berg Publishers, Oxford (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. International Standards Organisation (ISO): Standard 6385 (2020). https://www.iso.org/standard/63785.html

  11. Open Data Institute (ODI): The Data Ethics Canvas (2020). https://theodi.org/article/data-ethics-canvas/

  12. Reijers, W., et al.: Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: a literature review, critical analysis and recommendations. Sci. Eng. Ethics 24(5), 1437–1481 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brey, P.: Ethics of emerging technologies. In: Hansson, S.O. (ed.) Methods for the Ethics of Technology. Rowman and Littlefield International, Lanham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman, B., David, G.: Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. MIT Press, Cambridge (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright, D., Mordini, E.: Privacy and ethical impact assessment. In: Wright, D., De Hert, P. (eds.) Privacy Impact Assessment Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 6. Springer, Dordrecht (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2543-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Stahl, B., Heersmink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., Van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K.: Identifying the ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: an essay on issues, concepts and method. Int. J. Technoeth. 1(4), 20–38 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D.: Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Stud. Ethics Law Technol. 4(2), 1–38 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotton, M.: Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Springer, Berlin (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Fecher, B., Kobsda, C.: Research Impacts Canvas (RIC). https://elephantinthelab.org/meet-the-research-impact-canvas-a-structured-guide-for-planning-your-science-communication-activities/. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  20. Forsberg, E.M.: The ethical matrix—a tool for ethical assessments of biotechnology. Glob. Bioeth. 17(1), 167–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2004.10800856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerlach, R. The Digital Product Ethics Canvas. https://www.threebility.com/post/the-digital-product-ethics-canvas. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  22. Vaish, P.: Humans & machines ethics canvas (2020). https://adataanalyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ETHICS_Canvas_2.pdf

  23. Adapt Centre for Digital Content Technologies. The Data Ethics Canvas. https://ethicscanvas.org/. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  24. Cahill, J.: Human factors & ethics canvas: a white paper. https://www.tcd.ie/cihs/projects/hfaecanvas.php. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  25. Cousins, J.B., Whitmore, E., Shulha, L.: Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. Am. J. Eval. 34, 7–22 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Pruitt, J., Grudin, J.: Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (DUX 2003), pp. 1–15. ACM, New York (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997089

  28. Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Beever, J., Brightman, Andrew O.: Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22(1), 275–291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markus, M.L., Mentzer, K.: Foresight for a responsible future with ICT. Inf. Syst. Front. 16, 353–368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9479-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nordmann, A.: If and then: a critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1), 31–46 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Poel, I.: Translating values into design requirements. In: Michelfelder, Diane P., McCarthy, N., Goldberg, David E. (eds.) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. PET, vol. 15, pp. 253–266. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Van den Hoven, J., Manders-Huits, N.: Value-sensitive design. In: Kyrre, J., Olsen, B., Hendricks, V.F. (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310795.ch1

  34. Albrechtslund, A.: Ethics and technology design. Ethics Inf. Technol. 9(1), 63–72 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9129-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Cahill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Human Factors and Ethics Canvas (HFEC)

Appendix A: Human Factors and Ethics Canvas (HFEC)

1.1 Stage 0 (Project Information and Research Summary)

See Table 1.

Table 1. HFEC: Stage 0 (Project Information & Research Summary)

1.2 Stage 1 (Formulating the Problem and Framing the Question)

See Table 2.

Table 2. HFEC: Stage 1 (Formulating the Problem & Framing the Question)

1.3 Stage 2 (Understanding Technology and Fit to Problem/Stakeholder Needs & Expected Benefits)

See Table 3.

Table 3. HFEC: Stage 2 (Understanding Technology & Fit to Problem/Stakeholder Needs & Expected Benefits)

1.4 Stage 3 (Deep Dive: Benefits, Outcomes and Impact)

See Table 4.

Table 4. HFEC: Stage 3 (Deep Dive: Benefits, Outcomes & Impact)

1.5 Stage 4 (Deep Dive: Personae and Scenarios)

See Table 5.

Table 5. HFEC: Stage 4 (Deep Dive: Personae & Scenarios)

1.6 Stage 5 (Deep Dive: Data Ethics)

See Table 6.

Table 6. HFEC: Stage 5 (Deep Dive: Data Ethics)

1.7 Stage 6 (Implementation)

See Table 7.

Table 7. HFEC: Stage 6 (Implementation)

1.8 Stage 7 (Human Factors and Ethics Summary)

See Table 8.

Table 8. HFEC: Stage 7 (Human Factors & Ethics Summary)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cahill, J. (2020). Embedding Ethics in Human Factors Design and Evaluation Methodologies. In: Duffy, V. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Communication, Organization and Work. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49906-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49907-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics