Abstract
Methodologies are required to enable the active translation of ethical issues pertaining to the human and social dimensions of new technologies, in a manner that considers the diversity of practices across research and innovation and commercial research projects. This paper presents a new methodology for embedding ethics assessment in human machine interaction (HMI)/human factors (HF) design and evaluation activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elkington, J.: Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business, ISBN 9780865713925. OCLC 963459936. Capstone, Oxford (1999)
Stephanidis, C.C., et al.: Seven HCI grand challenges. Int. J. Hum.– Comput. Interact. 35(14), 1229–1269 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
European Commission: Ethics for researchers. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/ethics-forresearchers_en.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Geoghegan-Quinn, M.: Responsible Research & Innovation. European Union Publications Office, Brussels (2014)
Capurro, R.: Digital ethics. In: The Academy of Korean Studies (ed.): Civilization and Peace. Academy of Korean Studies 2010, Korea, pp. 203–214 (2009)
Sollie, P.: Ethics, technology development and uncertainty: an outline for any future ethics of technology. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 5(4), 293–306 (2007)
Heidegger, M.: The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, 6th edn. Harper & Row, New York (1977)
Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1986)
Fry, T.: Becoming Human by Design. Berg Publishers, Oxford (2012)
International Standards Organisation (ISO): Standard 6385 (2020). https://www.iso.org/standard/63785.html
Open Data Institute (ODI): The Data Ethics Canvas (2020). https://theodi.org/article/data-ethics-canvas/
Reijers, W., et al.: Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: a literature review, critical analysis and recommendations. Sci. Eng. Ethics 24(5), 1437–1481 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8
Brey, P.: Ethics of emerging technologies. In: Hansson, S.O. (ed.) Methods for the Ethics of Technology. Rowman and Littlefield International, Lanham (2017)
Friedman, B., David, G.: Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. MIT Press, Cambridge (2019)
Wright, D., Mordini, E.: Privacy and ethical impact assessment. In: Wright, D., De Hert, P. (eds.) Privacy Impact Assessment Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 6. Springer, Dordrecht (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2543-0_19
Stahl, B., Heersmink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., Van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K.: Identifying the ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: an essay on issues, concepts and method. Int. J. Technoeth. 1(4), 20–38 (2010)
Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D.: Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Stud. Ethics Law Technol. 4(2), 1–38 (2010)
Cotton, M.: Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Springer, Berlin (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4
Fecher, B., Kobsda, C.: Research Impacts Canvas (RIC). https://elephantinthelab.org/meet-the-research-impact-canvas-a-structured-guide-for-planning-your-science-communication-activities/. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Forsberg, E.M.: The ethical matrix—a tool for ethical assessments of biotechnology. Glob. Bioeth. 17(1), 167–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2004.10800856
Gerlach, R. The Digital Product Ethics Canvas. https://www.threebility.com/post/the-digital-product-ethics-canvas. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Vaish, P.: Humans & machines ethics canvas (2020). https://adataanalyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ETHICS_Canvas_2.pdf
Adapt Centre for Digital Content Technologies. The Data Ethics Canvas. https://ethicscanvas.org/. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Cahill, J.: Human factors & ethics canvas: a white paper. https://www.tcd.ie/cihs/projects/hfaecanvas.php. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Cousins, J.B., Whitmore, E., Shulha, L.: Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. Am. J. Eval. 34, 7–22 (2013)
Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Pruitt, J., Grudin, J.: Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (DUX 2003), pp. 1–15. ACM, New York (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997089
Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York (1995)
Beever, J., Brightman, Andrew O.: Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22(1), 275–291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5
Markus, M.L., Mentzer, K.: Foresight for a responsible future with ICT. Inf. Syst. Front. 16, 353–368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9479-9
Nordmann, A.: If and then: a critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1), 31–46 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6
Poel, I.: Translating values into design requirements. In: Michelfelder, Diane P., McCarthy, N., Goldberg, David E. (eds.) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. PET, vol. 15, pp. 253–266. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20
Van den Hoven, J., Manders-Huits, N.: Value-sensitive design. In: Kyrre, J., Olsen, B., Hendricks, V.F. (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310795.ch1
Albrechtslund, A.: Ethics and technology design. Ethics Inf. Technol. 9(1), 63–72 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9129-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: Human Factors and Ethics Canvas (HFEC)
Appendix A: Human Factors and Ethics Canvas (HFEC)
1.1 Stage 0 (Project Information and Research Summary)
See Table 1.
1.2 Stage 1 (Formulating the Problem and Framing the Question)
See Table 2.
1.3 Stage 2 (Understanding Technology and Fit to Problem/Stakeholder Needs & Expected Benefits)
See Table 3.
1.4 Stage 3 (Deep Dive: Benefits, Outcomes and Impact)
See Table 4.
1.5 Stage 4 (Deep Dive: Personae and Scenarios)
See Table 5.
1.6 Stage 5 (Deep Dive: Data Ethics)
See Table 6.
1.7 Stage 6 (Implementation)
See Table 7.
1.8 Stage 7 (Human Factors and Ethics Summary)
See Table 8.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cahill, J. (2020). Embedding Ethics in Human Factors Design and Evaluation Methodologies. In: Duffy, V. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Communication, Organization and Work. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49906-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49907-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)