Skip to main content

Improving the Usability of Voice User Interfaces: A New Set of Ergonomic Criteria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12201))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Technological progress has made possible to create voice user interfaces that feel more natural, as smart speakers notably show. As those develop, issues of usability have also been spotted that underline the fact that the way we are used to designing interfaces do not apply directly to voice interactions. Since heuristic and ergonomic criteria are the first way designers can improve their interfaces, we propose a new set of criteria for VUIs, based for the first time on an extensive review of academic and professional guidelines, and plugged into existing general heuristics. These criteria underline the need for VUIs to make up for the lack of visual cues, to take into account the social nature of conversations, as well as the need to own the fact that talking objects will be interpreted as full characters with a personality, and therefore need to be designed as such.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Voicebot.ai. https://voicebot.ai/2019/03/07/u-s-smart-speaker-ownership-rises-40-in-2018-to-66-4-million-and-amazon-echo-maintains-market-share-lead-says-new-report-from-voicebot/. Accessed 29 Jan 2020

  2. New York Times article. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/world/siri-alexa-ai-gender-bias.html. Accessed 29 Jan 2020

  3. Forbes article. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/02/28/should-my-child-be-polite-to-alexa-navigating-the-complex-world-of-human-ai-interaction/#7a7caa781b9f. Accessed 29 Jan 2020

  4. Scapin, D., Bastien, C.: Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 16(4/5), 220±223 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scholtz J.: Evaluation methods for human-system performance of intelligent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings ACM CHI 1990 Conference, Seattle, WA, pp. 249–256 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proceedings ACM CHI 1994 Conference, Boston, MA, 24–28 April, pp. 152–158 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Hara, K., Harper, R., Mentis, H., Sellen, A., Taylor, A.: On the naturalness of touchless: putting the “Interaction” back into NUI. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 20(1), 1–25 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelikan, H.R., Broth, M.: Why that Nao?: how humans adapt to a conventional humanoid robot in taking turns-at-talk. In: CHI 2016: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4921–4932 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Porcheron, M., Fischer, J.E., Reeves, S., Sharples, S.: Voice interfaces in everyday life. In: CHI 2018, Montréal, Canada (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mennicken, S., Zihler, O., Juldaschewa, F., Molnar, V., Aggeler, D., Huang, E.M.: «It’s like living with a friendly stranger»: perception of personality traits in a smart home. In: UBICOMP 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, D., Liberman, H.: Helping users understand and recover from interpretation failures in natural language interfaces. In: CHI 2012, 5–10 May 2012, Austin, Texas, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luger, E., Sellen, A.: Like having a really bad PA: the gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents. In: CHI 2016, San Jose, CA, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sauvage, O.: «Comment les français utilisent les enceintes intelligentes» Livre Blanc publié par Wexperience.fr. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quinones, D., Rusu, C.: How to develop usability heuristics: a systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 53, 89–122 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Jiménez, C., Rusu, V.: Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices. In: Ninth International Conference on Information Technology – New Generations (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bastien, C., Scapin, D.L.: Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces. RT-0156, INRIA, p. 79 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.: A methodology to establish usability heuristics. In: ACHI 2011: The Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pearl, C.: Designing Voice User Interfaces. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bouzid, A., Ma, W.: Don’t Make Me Tap! A Common Sense Approach to Voice Usability. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lahoual, D., Fréjus, M.: Conception d’interactions éthiques et durables entre l’humain et les systèmes d’intelligence artificielle. Le cas de l’expérience vécue des usagers de l’IA vocale. Revue d’intelligence artificielle 32(4) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer, J., Miller, C., Hancock, P., de Visser, E.J., Dorneich, M.: Politeness in machine-human and human-human interaction. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 279–283 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dubinsky, Y., Catarci, T., Kimani, S.: A user-based method for speech interface development. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 355–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Hua, Z., Ng, W.L.: Speech recognition interface design for in-vehicle. In: Automotive. UI 2010 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 29–33 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Minker, W., Néel, F.: Développement des technologies vocales. Le travail humain 65(3), 261–287 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Villiers, J.: The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua. Int. Rev. Gen. Linguist. 117(11), 1858–1878 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Nowacki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nowacki, C., Gordeeva, A., Lizé, AH. (2020). Improving the Usability of Voice User Interfaces: A New Set of Ergonomic Criteria. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49760-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49760-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49759-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49760-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics