Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing Human-Centered Interactions for Smart Environments Based on Heterogeneous, Interrelated Systems: A User Research Method for the “Age of Services” (URSERVe)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12201))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3848 Accesses

Abstract

Heterogeneous, interrelated systems leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) in smart environments such as a smart factory or smart city, pose many challenges for software design and development. Capturing and addressing the human needs is one of them and designing the interactions within smart applications is another. There are several reasons for this, for example diverse personas for both human as well as digital actors, a large variety of usage scenarios, a vast number of data exchange protocols, as well as data privacy and ethical concerns.

On top of this, the service-based architecture of smart environments has widened the gap between software development teams and their end users. Services are highly modular, decoupled units of application logic, developed for specific task units and as such they are one or even several hierarchy layers removed from the business logic of main applications, and, in consequence, from the applications’ users. Therefore, in our experience, service development groups often refrain from identifying their users and doing any kind of user research at all. The reasoning being that, because their services will only be used by applications or other services, and not directly by human or non-human users, these users cannot be identified at all or are of no importance. This paper proposes a bidirectional, complementary method to approach user research for smart environments, such as smart cities. It describes how service development teams can reach beyond the applications which consume their service to the users of these consuming apps and how, at the same time, the smart city projects can reap the benefits of the technological expertise that resides in the service development groups. Ultimately, the method helps to create a shared knowledge base which arguably fosters innovation within an organization responsible for the design, development and operation of smart environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design. Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casini, M.: Green technology for smart cities. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 83, no. 1, p. 12014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012014

  3. Cauteruccio, F., Cinelli, L., Fortino, G., et al.: Using sentiment analysis and automated reasoning to boost smart lighting systems. In: Montella, R., Ciaramella, A., Fortino, G., et al. (eds.) Internet and distributed computing systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11874, pp. 69–78. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34914-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Condea, C., Cruickshank, D., Hagedorn, P.: What co-innovation can mean for digital business transformation: sharing and managing risk to achieve IT Business innovation. In: Oswald, G., Kleinemeier, M. (eds.) Shaping the Digital Enterprise, pp. 287–307. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40967-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, D., Das, S.K.: Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols, and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Dell’Era, C., Landoni, P.: Living lab: a methodology between user-centred design and participatory design. Creat. Innov. Manag. 23(2), 137–154 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gianni, F., Divitini, M.: Designing IoT applications for smart cities: extending the tiles ideation toolkit. Interact. Des. Archit. J. - IxD&A, 35, 100–116 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gobbi, A., Spina, S.: Smart cities and languages: the language network. IxD&A – Interact. Des. Architect. 16, 37–46 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofstaetter, U.: SAP cloud platform – more than just PaaS (2018). https://blogs.sap.com/2018/10/12/sap-cloud-platform-more-than-just-paas/. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  10. Hui, T.K.L., Sherratt, R.S., Sánchez, D.D.: Major requirements for building smart homes in smart cities based on internet of things technologies. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 76, 358–369 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennex, M.E.: Big data, the internet of things, and the revised knowledge pyramid. SIGMIS Database 48(4), 69–79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3158421.3158427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinemeier, M.: How governments use AI to create better experiences for citizens (2019). https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2019/11/07/how-governments-use-ai-to-create-better-experiences-for-citizens/. Accessed 02 Feb 2020

  13. Kujala, S.: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22(1), 1–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290301782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience. A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Latre, S., Leroux, P., Coenen, T., et al.: City of things: an integrated and multi-technology testbed for IoT smart city experiments. In: Conference IISC (ed.) Improving the Citizens Quality of Life. IEEE Second International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2 2016), 12–15 September 2016, Trento, Italy, Proceedings, pp. 1–8. IEEE, Piscataway (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, S., Zhang, H., Jiaa, Z., et al.: A dataflow-driven approach to identifying microservices from monolithic applications. J. Syst. Softw. 157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.008

  17. Lom, M., Pribyl, O., Svitek, M.: Industry 4.0 as a part of smart cities. In: 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, pp. 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, J.D. (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, pp. 4–8. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mylonas, P., Siolas, G., Caridakis, G., et al.: Modeling context and fuzzy personas modeling context and fuzzy personas towards an intelligent future internet smart home paradigm. In: Botía, J.A., Charitos, D. (eds.) Workshop Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, pp. 732–743. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Panda, A., Sagiv, M., Shenker, S.: Verification in the age of microservices. In: Association for Computing Machinery-Digital Library (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, pp. 30–36. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Petritoli, E., Leccese, F., Pizzuti, S., et al.: Smart lighting as basic building block of smart city: an energy performance comparative case study. Measurement 136, 466–477 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pourzolfaghar, Z., Helfert, M.: Investigating HCI challenges for designing smart environments. In: Nah, F.F.-H.F.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9752, pp. 79–90. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan, S., O’Connor, R.V.: Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge in software development teams: an empirical study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(9), 1614–1624 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sauro, J., Lewis, J.R.: Quantifying the user experience Practical Statistics for User Research, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Semertzaki, E.: Knowledge management. In: Semertzaki, E. (ed.) Special Libraries as Knowledge Management Centres, pp. 57–119. Chandos, Oxford (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., et al.: Seven HCI grand challenges. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 35(14), 1229–1269 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., et al.: Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(22), 6572–6591 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1326643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. de Loo, J.: Smart lighting: integration intelligenter beleuchtungssysteme in smart cities. In: Etezadzadeh, C. (ed.) Smart City – Made in Germany, pp. 757–767. Springer, Wiesbaden (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27232-6_77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. S/4HANA Industries User Experience, SAP SE, Walldorf, Germany

    Alexandra Matz

  2. Digital Supply Chain User Experience, SAP SE, Walldorf, Germany

    Clarissa Götz

Authors
  1. Alexandra Matz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clarissa Götz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Matz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aaron Marcus and Associates, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Aaron Marcus

  2. World Usability Day and Bentley User Experience Center, Newton Center, MA, USA

    Elizabeth Rosenzweig

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Matz, A., Götz, C. (2020). Designing Human-Centered Interactions for Smart Environments Based on Heterogeneous, Interrelated Systems: A User Research Method for the “Age of Services” (URSERVe). In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49760-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49760-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49759-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49760-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation