Abstract
In the lifecycle of a nuclear power plant (NPP), commissioning is the last stage before commercial operation. To understand the nature of human errors in NPP commissioning tasks, the IDHEAS (Integrated Human Event Analysis System) method was adopted in this study to analyze 311 incident reports of NPP commissioning tasks, i.e. identifying the human errors as well as macrocognitive functions, proximate causes and cognitive mechanisms behind them. Results indicate that, in NPP commissioning tasks, individual failures of high-level mental processing had the highest occurrence frequency (59% of human errors with macrocognitive functions identified clearly), which should be specially concerned in risk management. As for human errors related with teamwork, failures of team communication were common in all categories of commissioning. The ratio of U1 items (reports didn’t provide sufficient information to analyze, 44% in total) emphasizes the necessity of a standardized format for incident reports to support HRA research. In this case study, analysis results presented an unsatisfactory between-analyst reliability of IDHEAS, and as a side product, four usability problems of IDHEAS were identified, indicating that some modifications are in need to improve the method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boring, R.L., Hendrickson, S.M.L., Forester, J.A., Tran, T.Q., Lois, E.: Issues in benchmarking human reliability analysis methods: a literature review. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95(6), 591–605 (2010)
Chang, Y.J., Xing, J.: The general methodology of an integrated human event analysis system (IDHEAS) for human reliability analysis method development. In: 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 13), Seoul, Korea, 2–7 October 2016 (2016)
Gertman, D., et al.: Nuclear Computerized Library for Assessing Reactor Reliability (NUCLARR): Summary Description (NUREG/CR-4639). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (1990)
Hallbert, B., et al.: Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA) System, Overview. Idaho National Laboratory (2006)
Kirwan, B., Basra, G., Tayloradam, S.E.: CORE-DATA: a computerised human error database for human reliability support. In: IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors & Power Plants Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation, 9/7-912, Orlando, FL, US, 8–13 June 1997 (1997)
Liao, H.: Insights from pilot testing of the IDHEAS HRA method. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1350–1357 (2015)
Liao, H., Groth, K., Stevens-Adams, S.: Challenges in leveraging existing human performance data for quantifying the IDHEAS HRA method. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 144, 159–169 (2015)
Liu, P., Lyu, X., Qiu, Y., Hu, J., Li, Z.: Identifying macrocognitive function failures from accident reports: a case study. In: Cetiner, S.M., et al. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 495, 29–40. Proceedings of the AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries, 27–31 July 2016, Florida, USA (2017)
Park, J., Jung, W.: OPERA—a human performance database under simulated emergencies of nuclear power plants. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 92(4), 503–519 (2007)
Swain, A.D., Guttmann, H.E.: Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (1983)
Whaley, A.M., et al.: Cognitive Basis for Human Reliability Analysis (NUREG-2114). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (2016)
Xing, J., Chang, Y.J.: Use of IDHEAS general methodology to incorporate human performance data for estimation of human error probabilities. In: 14th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 14), Los Angeles, CA, US, 16–21 September 2018 (2018)
Xing, J., Parry, G., Presley, M., Forester, J., Hendrickson, S., Dang, V.: An Integrated Human Event Analysis System (IDHEAS) for Nuclear Power Plant Internal Events At-Power Application (NUREG-2199). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (2017)
Zwirglmaier, K., Straub, D., Groth, K.M.: Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 158, 117–129 (2016)
Acknowledgments
This study was partly supported by China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd (CNPEC) Science and Technology Innovation Project (Project No. K-A2017.401).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yin, Z., Liu, Z., Yang, D., Li, Z. (2020). Using IDHEAS to Analyze Incident Reports in Nuclear Power Plant Commissioning: A Case Study. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49182-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49183-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)