Skip to main content

Using IDHEAS to Analyze Incident Reports in Nuclear Power Plant Commissioning: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12187))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the lifecycle of a nuclear power plant (NPP), commissioning is the last stage before commercial operation. To understand the nature of human errors in NPP commissioning tasks, the IDHEAS (Integrated Human Event Analysis System) method was adopted in this study to analyze 311 incident reports of NPP commissioning tasks, i.e. identifying the human errors as well as macrocognitive functions, proximate causes and cognitive mechanisms behind them. Results indicate that, in NPP commissioning tasks, individual failures of high-level mental processing had the highest occurrence frequency (59% of human errors with macrocognitive functions identified clearly), which should be specially concerned in risk management. As for human errors related with teamwork, failures of team communication were common in all categories of commissioning. The ratio of U1 items (reports didn’t provide sufficient information to analyze, 44% in total) emphasizes the necessity of a standardized format for incident reports to support HRA research. In this case study, analysis results presented an unsatisfactory between-analyst reliability of IDHEAS, and as a side product, four usability problems of IDHEAS were identified, indicating that some modifications are in need to improve the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boring, R.L., Hendrickson, S.M.L., Forester, J.A., Tran, T.Q., Lois, E.: Issues in benchmarking human reliability analysis methods: a literature review. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95(6), 591–605 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.J., Xing, J.: The general methodology of an integrated human event analysis system (IDHEAS) for human reliability analysis method development. In: 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 13), Seoul, Korea, 2–7 October 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertman, D., et al.: Nuclear Computerized Library for Assessing Reactor Reliability (NUCLARR): Summary Description (NUREG/CR-4639). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallbert, B., et al.: Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA) System, Overview. Idaho National Laboratory (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B., Basra, G., Tayloradam, S.E.: CORE-DATA: a computerised human error database for human reliability support. In: IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors & Power Plants Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation, 9/7-912, Orlando, FL, US, 8–13 June 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H.: Insights from pilot testing of the IDHEAS HRA method. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1350–1357 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Groth, K., Stevens-Adams, S.: Challenges in leveraging existing human performance data for quantifying the IDHEAS HRA method. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 144, 159–169 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P., Lyu, X., Qiu, Y., Hu, J., Li, Z.: Identifying macrocognitive function failures from accident reports: a case study. In: Cetiner, S.M., et al. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 495, 29–40. Proceedings of the AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries, 27–31 July 2016, Florida, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Jung, W.: OPERA—a human performance database under simulated emergencies of nuclear power plants. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 92(4), 503–519 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, A.D., Guttmann, H.E.: Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, A.M., et al.: Cognitive Basis for Human Reliability Analysis (NUREG-2114). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, J., Chang, Y.J.: Use of IDHEAS general methodology to incorporate human performance data for estimation of human error probabilities. In: 14th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 14), Los Angeles, CA, US, 16–21 September 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, J., Parry, G., Presley, M., Forester, J., Hendrickson, S., Dang, V.: An Integrated Human Event Analysis System (IDHEAS) for Nuclear Power Plant Internal Events At-Power Application (NUREG-2199). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwirglmaier, K., Straub, D., Groth, K.M.: Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 158, 117–129 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd (CNPEC) Science and Technology Innovation Project (Project No. K-A2017.401).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhizhong Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yin, Z., Liu, Z., Yang, D., Li, Z. (2020). Using IDHEAS to Analyze Incident Reports in Nuclear Power Plant Commissioning: A Case Study. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49182-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49183-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics