Abstract
The message of this chapter is that, because of its links to industry and its focus on job-specific education, university of applied sciences (UAS) is very well placed to foster regional development in two ways: First, the education role the UASs can play is an important part in developing enterprising skills, knowledge and cultures to ensure that regional human capital is used to its full potential. Second, through using its close connections with business, the UASs can contribute to regional development by building regional coalitions and linkages. Many of these networks are forged through research and consultancy services for regional business and involve students doing graduate work or placements. In observing these options, the UASs can become a key asset for the economic development of their region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. Paris: OECD/IMHE.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Benneworth, P., Hospers, G. J., & Jongbloed, B. (2006). New economic impulses in old industrial regions. The case of the University of Twente. In A. Prinz, A. E. Steenge, & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Innovation: Technical, economic and institutional aspects (pp. 1–24). Berlin: Lit.
Buursink, J. (2002). Regionale impact universiteiten overschat. Geografie, 11, 36–39.
Cooke, P. (Ed.). (1995). The rise of the rustbelt. London: UCL Press.
Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5–15.
Florax, R. (1992). The university: A regional booster? Ashgate: Aldershot.
Florida, R. (1995). Towards the learning region. Futures, 27, 527–536.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Fukuyama, F. (1999). Trust: The social values and the creation of prosperity. London: Penguin Books.
Garlick, S. (2000). Engaging universities and regions. Knowledge contribution to regional economic development in Australia. Canberra: DETYA.
Garlick, S., Taylor, M., & Plummer, P. (2008). An enterprising approach to regional growth. Implications for policy and the role of vocational education and training. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
Gibbons, J. F. (2000). The role of Stanford University: A dean’s reflections. In C. M. Lee, W. F. Miller, M. Gong Hancock, & H. S. Rowen (Eds.), The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 200–217). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Goddard, J. (1997). Managing the university/region interface. Higher Education Management, 9, 7–27.
Goddard, J. B., Charles, D., Pike, A., Potts, G., & Bradley, D. (1994). Universities and communities. London: CVCP.
Harvie, C. (1994). The rise of regional Europe. New York: Routledge.
Jongbloed, B., & van der Sijde, P. (2008). Interacties tussen universiteit en MKB. Report for the Ministry of Economic Affairs. Enschede: CHEPS & NIKOS.
Laredo, P. (2007). Toward a third mission for universities. Paper presented at UNESCO Forum. ‘Globalizing Knowledge’. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001578/157815e.pdf
Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., & Hannibalsson, I. (1998). Competitiveness, localized learning and regional development: Specialization and prosperity in small open economies. London: Routledge.
Moore, G. E., & Davis, K. (2004). Learning the Silicon Valley way. In T. Bresnahan & A. Gambardella (Eds.), Building high-tech clusters: Silicon valley and beyond (pp. 190–228). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography. Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 3–21.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
OECD (1999). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: OECD.
OECD-CERI (1982). The university and the community. The problems of changing relationships. Paris: OECD.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rhoades, G. A. (1983). Conflicting interests in higher education. American Journal of Education, 91, 283–327.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Siegfried, J. J., Sanderson, A. R., & McHenry, P. (2008). The economic impact of colleges and universities. Change, 40, 25–29.
Trow, M. (1997). The development of information technology in American higher education. Daedalus, 126, 293–314.
Vickerman, R. W. (1991). Infrastructure and regional development: Vol. 1. European Research in Regional Science. London: Pion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jongbloed, B. (2010). The Regional Relevance of Research in Universities of Applied Sciences. In: Kyvik, S., Lepori, B. (eds) The Research Mission of Higher Education Institutions outside the University Sector. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9244-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9244-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9243-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9244-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)