Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible aetiology. Currently, there are no randomised, controlled studies on eCPR. Thus, prospective validated predictors of benefit and outcome are lacking. Currently, selection criteria and procedure techniques differ across hospitals and standardised algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a first standardised treatment algorithm for eCPR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD (2005) Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 67(1):75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL et al (2014) Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129(3):399–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawkes C, Booth S, Ji C et al (2017) Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in England. Resuscitation 110:133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spangenberg T, Schewel J, Dreher A et al (2018) Health related quality of life after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 127:73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuisma M, Alaspää A (1997) Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin. Epidemiology and outcome. Eur Heart J 18(7):1122–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hess EP, Campbell RL, White RD (2007) Epidemiology, trends, and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin. Resuscitation 72(2):200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandroni C, Nolan J, Cavallaro F, Antonelli M (2007) In–hospital cardiac arrest: Incidence, prognosis and possible measures to improve survival. Intensive Care Med 33:237–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ et al (2015) Part 7: advanced cardiovascular life support—2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 132(Suppl 2):S444–S464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karam N, Marijon E, Dumas F et al (2017) Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest according to the time of occurrence. Resuscitation 116:16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soar J, Nolan JP, Böttiger BW et al (2015) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Sect. 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 95:100–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SJ, Kim HJ, Lee HY et al (2016) Comparing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Resuscitation 103:106–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vdovin N, Günther SPW, de Waha S et al (2017) Early risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with extracorporeal life support and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(23):2469–2471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY et al (2008) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet 372:554–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang CH, Chou NK, Becker LB et al (2014) Improved outcome of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a comparison with that for extracorporeal rescue for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 85(9):1219–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fagnoul D, Combes A, De Backer D (2014) Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 20(3):259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blumenstein J, Leick J, Liebetrau C et al (2016) Extracorporeal life support in cardiovascular patients with observed refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with favourable short and long-term outcomes: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 5(7):13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spangenberg T, Meincke F, Brooks S et al (2016) “Shock and Go?” extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in the golden-hour of ROSC. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88(5):691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Combes A, Brodie D, Chen YS et al (2017) The ICM research agenda on extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med 43(9):1306–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Debaty G, Babaz V, Durand M et al (2017) Prognostic factors for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation recipients following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 112:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Conrad SA, Rycus PT (2017) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest. Ann Card Anaesth 20(Suppl):S4–S10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson AS, Schmidt M, Bailey M et al (2017) ECMO cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), trends in survival from an international multicentre cohort study over 12-years. Resuscitation 112:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haas NL, Coute RA, Hsu CH et al (2017) Descriptive analysis of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—an ELSO registry study. Resuscitation 119:56–62

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ouweneel DM, Schotborgh JV, Limpens J et al (2016) Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42:1922–1934

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Trummer G, Bein B, Buerke M et al (2011) Standardized terminology of mechanical heart, lung and circulatory assist devices: a recommendation of the Section “Heart and Circulation” of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Critical Care Medicine. Appl Cardiopulm Pathophysiol 15:181–182

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michels G, Thiele H, Kluge S, Pfister R (2017) Are there any prognostic predictors for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 112(7):634–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. ELSO ECPR Supplement to the ELSO General Guidelines (2013) Version 1.3. https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/IGD/Archive/FileManager/6713186745cusersshyerdocumentselsoguidelinesforecprcases1.3.pdf

  27. Günther S, Born F, Buchholz S et al (2018) Patienten unter Reanimation: Kandidaten für “Extracorporeal Life Support”? Z Herz Thorax-Gefäßchir 32:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wengenmayer T, Rombach S, Ramshorn F et al (2017) Influence of low-flow time on survival after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). Crit Care 21(1):157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuroki N, Abe D, Iwama T et al (2017) Association between delay to coronary reperfusion and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 114:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abrams D, Garan AR, Abdelbary A et al (2018) Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5064-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Raveendran G et al (2017) Coronary artery disease in patients with out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(9):1109–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hayashida K, Suzuki M, Yonemoto N et al (2017) Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcomes in patients with postcardiac arrest syndrome: a prospective, multicenter observational study (SOS-KANTO 2012 Study). Crit Care Med 45(6):e559–e566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O, Kuhn E et al (2017) Lactate and lactate clearance as valuable tool to evaluate ECMO therapy in cardiogenic shock. J Crit Care 42:35–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Momiyama Y, Yamada W, Miyata K et al (2017) Prognostic values of blood pH and lactate levels in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acute Med Surg 4(1):25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeserson E, Goodgame B, Hess JD et al (2018) Correlation of venous blood gas and pulse oximetry with arterial blood gas in the undifferentiated critically ill patient. J Intensive Care Med 33(3):176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Siegenthaler W (2005) Differentialdiagnose, vol 19. Thieme, Auflage

    Google Scholar 

  37. Geisler AC, Söffker G, Breunig F et al (2014) Der besondere Fall-Optimale Rettungskette. Hamb Arztebl Bd 68(10):44–46

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hohmann C, Pfister R, Michels G (2018) Are the initial pH and the lactate values after cardiopulmonary resuscitation always crucial?. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-018-0432-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shin J, Lim YS, Kim K et al (2017) Initial blood pH during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a multicenter observational registry-based study. Crit Care 21(1):322

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gil E, Na SJ, Ryu JA et al (2017) Association of body mass index with clinical outcomes for in-hospital cardiac arrest adult patients following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. PLoS One 12(4):e0176143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kang SB, Kim KS, Suh GJ et al (2017) Long-term survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with malignancy. Am J Emerg Med 35(10):1457–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sulzgruber P, Sterz F, Poppe M et al (2017) Age-specific prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—the ethical dilemma between ‘life-sustaining treatment’ and ‘the right to die’ in the elderly. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 6(2):112–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pabst D, El-Banayosy A, Soleimani B, Brehm CE (2018) Predictors of survival for nonhighly selected patients undergoing resuscitation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac arrest. ASAIO J 64(3):368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Parise O et al (2017) Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock in elderly patients: trends in application and outcome from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry. Ann Thorac Surg 104(1):62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Riggs KR, Becker LB, Sugarman J (2015) Ethics in the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Resuscitation 91:73–75

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mancini ME, Diekema DS, Hoadley TA et al (2015) Part 3: Ethical Issues: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 132(18 Suppl 2):S383–S396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Meltzer EC, Ivascu NS, Stark M et al (2016) A survey of physicians’ attitudes toward decision-making authority for initiating and withdrawing VA-ECMO: results and ethical implications for shared decision making. J Clin Ethics 27(4):281–289

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Makdisi T, Makdisi G (2017) Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation support: ethical dilemmas. Ann Transl Med 5(5):112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Niecke A, Schneider G, Hartog CS, Michels G (2017) Traumatized relatives of intensive care patients. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 112(7):612–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stiell IG, Nichol G, Leroux BG et al (2011) Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 365(9):787–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Goslar T, Knafelj R, Radsel P et al (2016) Emergency percutaneous implantation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the catheterisation laboratory. EuroIntervention 12(12):1465–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kashiura M, Sugiyama K, Tanabe T, Akashi A, Hamabe Y (2017) Effect of ultrasonography and fluoroscopic guidance on the incidence of complications of cannulation in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 17(1):4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Voicu S, Henry P, Malissin I et al (2018) Improving cannulation time for extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause—comparison of two percutaneous cannulation techniques in the catheterization laboratory in a center without on-site cardiovascular surgery. Resuscitation 122:69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Reynolds JC, Callaway CW, El Khoudary SR et al (2009) Coronary angiography predicts improved outcome following cardiac arrest: propensity-adjusted analysis. J Intensive Care Med 24(3):179–186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Dumas F, Cariou A, Manzo-Silberman S et al (2010) Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of hospital Cardiac ArresT) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3(3):200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kragholm K, Malta Hansen C, Dupre ME et al (2017) Direct transport to a percutaneous cardiac intervention center and outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 10(6):e003414. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Scholz KH, Andresen D, Böttiger BW et al (2017) Quality indicators and structural requirements for Cardiac Arrest Centers-German Resuscitation Council (GRC). Kardiologe 11:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jarosz A, Darocha T, Kosiński S et al (2017) Profound accidental hypothermia: systematic approach to active recognition and treatment. ASAIO J 63(3):e26–e30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Beckmann A, Benk C, Beyersdorf F et al (2011) Position article for the use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(3):676–680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Combes A, Brodie D, Bartlett R et al (2014) Position paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190(5):488–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Dirnberger D, Fiser R, Harvey C et al (2015) Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), Guidelines for ECMO Transport. https://www.elso.org/resources/guidelines.aspx

  62. Broman LM, Frenckner B (2016) Transportation of Critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Front Pediatr 4:63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Michels G, Zinke H, Möckel M et al (2017) Recommendations for education in ultrasound in medical intensive care and emergency medicine: position paper of DGIIN, DEGUM and DGK. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 112(4):314–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang Z (2017) Echocardiography for patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a primer for intensive care physicians. J Intensive Care 5:15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Price S, Platz E, Cullen L et al (2017) Expert consensus document: echocardiography and lung ultrasonography for the assessment and management of acute heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol 14(7):427–440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Nolan JP, Hazinski MF, Aickin R et al (2015) Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 95:e1–e31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Olasveengen TM, de Caen AR, Mancini ME et al (2017) 2017 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations summary. Circulation 136(23):e424–e440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Perkins GD, Olasveengen TM, Maconochie I et al (2018) European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation: 2017 update. Resuscitation 123:43–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Swol J, Belohlávek J, Haft JW et al (2016) Conditions and procedures for in-hospital extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of adult patients. Perfusion 31(3):182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Leick J, Liebetrau C, Szardien S et al (2013) Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Clin Res Cardiol 102(9):661–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nanjayya VB, Murphy D (2015) Ultrasound guidance for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation general guidelines. https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/Files/elso_Ultrasoundguideance_ecmogeneral_guidelines_May2015.pdf

  72. Ahn HJ, Lee JW, Joo KH et al (2018) Point-of-care ultrasound-guided percutaneous cannulation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: make it simple. J Emerg Med 54(4):507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Beck L, Burg MC, Heindel W, Schülke C (2017) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults—variants, complications during therapy, and the role of radiological imaging. Rofo 189(2):119–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pang PY, Wee GH, Hoo AE et al (2016) Therapeutic hypothermia in adult patients receiving extracorporeal life support: early results of a randomized controlled study. J Cardiothorac Surg 11:43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Spartera M, Jabbour RJ, Chiarito M, De Bonis M, Pappalardo F (2017) Stepwise use of circulatory support devices in a patient refractory to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 18(6):447–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tepper S, Masood MF, Baltazar Garcia M et al (2017) Left ventricular unloading by impella device versus surgical vent during extracorporeal life support. Ann Thorac Surg 104(3):861–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2018) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39(2):119–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnson B, Runyon M, Weekes A, Pearson D (2017) Team-focused cardiopulmonary resuscitation: prehospital principles adapted for emergency department cardiac arrest resuscitation. J Emerg Med S0736-4679(17):30771–30770

    Google Scholar 

  79. Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM et al (2015) Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191(8):894–901

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Michels.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Michels G is a member of the scientific advisory board of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, DGIIN), commissionery leader of the working group of “Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation” of the German Society for Cardiology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, DGK) and member of the working group “ECMO / eCPR” of the German Resuscitation Council (GRC) and received lecture fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Servier, ZOLL and Orion Pharma. Bauersachs J is the leader of the DFG-funded Clinical Research Group (KFO) 311 “(Pre) terminal heart and lung failure: Relief and Repair” and received lecture fees and research support from Abiomed and ZOLL. Böttiger BW is European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Board Director Science and Research, chairman of the German Resuscitation Council (GRC), member of the “Advanced Cardiac Life Support” (ALS) Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), member of the presidium of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, DIVI), associated editor of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), co-editor of the journal Resuscitation, editor of the journal Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. For lectures he has received fees from the following companies: Medupdate, Forum for Medical Education (FoMF), Baxalta, Bayer Vita, ZOLL, BARD. Ghanem A has received lecture fees from Getinge. Markewitz A received a lecture fee from TÜV Süd, München. Gräsner JT is the leader of the scientific working group “emergency medicine” of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, DGAI), speaker of the organizing committee of the “German Reanimation Registry”, Chair of the European Registry of Cardiac Arrest, member of the executive committee of the German Council for Resuscitation (GRC), member of the presidium of the professional association of german anaesthesiologists. Kreimeier U is leader of the working group “Advanced Life Support” at the German Resuscitation Council (GRC). Wengenmayer T, Hagl C, Dohmen C, Bauer A, Pfister R, Busch HJ, Beckmann A, Fischer M, Kill C, Janssens U, Kluge S, Born F, Hoffmeister HM, Preusch M, Boeken U, Riessen R and Thiele H declare, that there is no conflict of interest with respect to the subject publication.

Additional information

This consensus statement was also published in Medizinische Klinik—Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Der Kardiologe, Der Anaesthesist, Zeitschrift für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie und Anästhesiologie and Intensivmedizin. The consensus paper is currently available in German only. This paper is the first English version of the eCPR German consensus statement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michels, G., Wengenmayer, T., Hagl, C. et al. Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC. Clin Res Cardiol 108, 455–464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1366-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1366-4

Keywords

Navigation