Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity and validity of the emergency severity index (ESI) using 3 vital signs vs. the modified ESI (mESI) with 7 vital signs.
This prospective, observational study comprised all patients without trauma (>18 years old), presenting between 1 September 2014 and 1 October 2014 from 08:00–16:00 h, and having ESI triage scores levels 3, 4, and 5. Different from the ESI, 7 vital signs for patients in levels 3, 4, and 5 were determined. When the result revealed an abnormality in at least one of the 7 vital signs, these patients were designated as level 2 and the mESI triage was applied to them.
A total of 4536 patients were included in the study. Comparing the hospitalized patient group and the patients treated as outpatients according to the ESI and mESI levels, the ESI and the mESI level median values were 4 (3–4) and 3 (2–4), respectively, and those of patients treated on an outpatient basis were 4 (4–5) and 4 (3–5). A significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to both the ESI and the mESI scores (p < 0.001). Furthermore, when the ESI and the mESI were compared with regard to the sensitivity and the reliability in determining the patients for hospitalization, a significant difference was determined favoring ESI [ROC curve: area under the curve mESI: 0.690, 95 % confidence interval (Cl) 0.666–0.713; ESI 0.753, 95 % Cl 0.733–0.774; p < 0.001].
The ESI, in which 3 vital signs are measured in order to distinguish only level 2 and 3 patients, is an adequate and reliable triage system.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Gilboy N, Tanabe T, Travers D et al (2011) Emergency Severity Index (ESI): a triage tool for emergency department care, version 4. AHRQ Publication No.12-0014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville
American College of Emergency Physicians. ER 101: Vital Signs (2014) ACEP: December 11
American Diabetes Association (2015) Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 38(Suppl 1):S1–S93
American Hospital Association Chartbook. Trends affecting hospitals and health systems. http://www.aha.org/research/reports/tw/chartbook/ch3.shtml. Zugegriffen: 9. Juni 2013
Institute of Medicine (ed) (2006) Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Kenward G, Hodgets T, Castle N (2001) Time to put the R back in TPR. Nurs Times 97:32–33 PubMed
Alcock K, Clancy M, Crouch R (2002) Physiological observations of patients admitted from A & E. Nurs Stand 8:33–37 CrossRef
McGloin H, Adam SK, Singer M (1999) Unexpected deaths and referrals to intensive care of patients from general wards. Are some cases potentially avoidable? J R Coll Physicians Lond 33:255–259 PubMed
Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P et al (2001) Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions. Q J Med 94:521–526 CrossRef
Dent A, Rofe G, Sansom G (1999) Which triage category patients die in hospital after being admitted through emergency departments? A study in one teaching hospital. Emerg Med 11:68–71 CrossRef
Doherty SR, Hore CT, Curran SW (2003) Inpatient mortality as related to triage category in three New South Wales regional base hospitals. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 15:334–340 CrossRef
Kim TG, Cho JK, Kim SH et al (2006) Reliability and validity of the modifiedemergency severity index-2 as a triage tool. J Korean Soc. Emerg Med 17:154–164
- Triage using the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and seven versus three vital signs
M.D. Y. K. Gunaydin
C. G. Yıldız
Z. D. Dündar
N. B. Akilli
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg