Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 4/2016

01.06.2016 | Beiträge zum Themenschwerpunkt

Social service robots to support independent living

Experiences from a field trial

verfasst von: J. Pripfl, T. Körtner, D. Batko-Klein, D. Hebesberger, M. Weninger, C. Gisinger

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Assistive robots could be a future means to support independent living for seniors.

Objective

This article provides insights into the latest developments in social service robots (SSR) based on the recently finished HOBBIT project. The idea of the HOBBIT project was to develop a low-cost SSR which is able to reduce the risk of falling, to detect falls and handle emergencies in private homes. The main objective of the project was to raise the technology to a level that allows the robot to be fully autonomously deployed in the private homes of older users and to evaluate technology market readiness, utility, usability and affordability under real-world conditions.

Method

During the initial phase of the project, a first prototype (PT1) was developed. The results of laboratory tests with PT1 were used for the development of a second prototype (PT2), which was finally tested in seven households of senior adults (mean age 79 years) for 3 weeks each, i.e. in total more than 5 months.

Results

The results showed that PT2 is intuitive to handle and that the functions offered meet the needs of older users; however, the robot was considered more as a toy than a supportive device for independent living. Furthermore, despite an emergency function of the robot, perceived security did not increase.

Conclusion

Reasons for this might be a lack of technological robustness and slow performance of the prototype and also the good health conditions of the users; however, users believed that a market-ready version of the robot would be vital for supporting people who are more fragile and more socially isolated. Thus, SSRs have the potential to support independent living of older people although the technology has to be considerably improved to reach market readiness.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME (1992) The cost and frequency of hospitalization for fall-related injuries in older adults. Am J Public Health 82:1020–1023 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME (1992) The cost and frequency of hospitalization for fall-related injuries in older adults. Am J Public Health 82:1020–1023 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Amirabdollahian F, Op Den Akker R, Bedaf S et al (2013) Accompany: Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNG Years – Multidimensional aspects of human-system interactions. In: 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), pp 570–577 Amirabdollahian F, Op Den Akker R, Bedaf S et al (2013) Accompany: Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNG Years – Multidimensional aspects of human-system interactions. In: 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), pp 570–577
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Beer JM, Smarr C‑A, Chen TL et al (2012) The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, pp 335–342 Beer JM, Smarr C‑A, Chen TL et al (2012) The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, pp 335–342
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P et al (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13:114–120 CrossRefPubMed Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P et al (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13:114–120 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernabei V, Ronchi D De, Ferla T La et al (2013) Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: A review. J Psychiatr Res 47:762–773 CrossRefPubMed Bernabei V, Ronchi D De, Ferla T La et al (2013) Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: A review. J Psychiatr Res 47:762–773 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridenbaugh SA, Kressig RW (2015) Motor cognitive dual tasking: early detection of gait impairment, fall risk and cognitive decline. Z Gerontol Geriatr 48:15–21 CrossRefPubMed Bridenbaugh SA, Kressig RW (2015) Motor cognitive dual tasking: early detection of gait impairment, fall risk and cognitive decline. Z Gerontol Geriatr 48:15–21 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Broadbent E, Stafford R, Macdonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1:319–330 CrossRef Broadbent E, Stafford R, Macdonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1:319–330 CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8:94–103 CrossRef Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8:94–103 CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q 13(3):319–340 CrossRef Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q 13(3):319–340 CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Deshpande N, Metter EJ, Lauretani F et al (2008) Activity restriction induced by fear of falling and objective and subjective measures of physical function: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:615–620 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deshpande N, Metter EJ, Lauretani F et al (2008) Activity restriction induced by fear of falling and objective and subjective measures of physical function: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:615–620 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldwieser F, Gietzelt M, Goevercin M et al (2014) Multimodal sensor-based fall detection within the domestic environment of elderly people. Z Gerontol Geriatr 47:661–665 CrossRefPubMed Feldwieser F, Gietzelt M, Goevercin M et al (2014) Multimodal sensor-based fall detection within the domestic environment of elderly people. Z Gerontol Geriatr 47:661–665 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K et al (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned. Rob Auton Syst 75:60–78 CrossRef Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K et al (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned. Rob Auton Syst 75:60–78 CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Koertner T, Schmid A, Batko-Klein D et al (2014) Meeting Requirements of Older Users? Robot Prototype Trials in a Home-like Environment. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Aging and Assistive Environments. Lect Notes Comput Sci 8515:660–671 CrossRef Koertner T, Schmid A, Batko-Klein D et al (2014) Meeting Requirements of Older Users? Robot Prototype Trials in a Home-like Environment. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Aging and Assistive Environments. Lect Notes Comput Sci 8515:660–671 CrossRef
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T (2006) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction. Ai Soc 20:138–150 CrossRef Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T (2006) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction. Ai Soc 20:138–150 CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Parette P, Scherer M (2004) Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil 39:217–226 Parette P, Scherer M (2004) Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil 39:217–226
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F et al (2015) “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci 7: doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141 PubMedPubMedCentral Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F et al (2015) “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci 7: doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141 PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Poli P, Morone G, Rosati G et al (2013) Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: New tools for stroke patients’ therapy. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–8 CrossRef Poli P, Morone G, Rosati G et al (2013) Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: New tools for stroke patients’ therapy. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–8 CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafford RQ, Macdonald BA, Jayawardena C et al (2014) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int J Soc Robot 6:17–32 CrossRef Stafford RQ, Macdonald BA, Jayawardena C et al (2014) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int J Soc Robot 6:17–32 CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterling DA, O’Connor JA, Bonadies J (2001) Geriatric falls: injury severity is high and disproportionate to mechanism. J Trauma 50:116–119 CrossRefPubMed Sterling DA, O’Connor JA, Bonadies J (2001) Geriatric falls: injury severity is high and disproportionate to mechanism. J Trauma 50:116–119 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA et al (2012) Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:1–15 CrossRefPubMed Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA et al (2012) Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:1–15 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F et al (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: A systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:598–606 CrossRefPubMed Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F et al (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: A systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:598–606 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner K, Oberzaucher J, Werner F (2012) Evaluation of human robot interaction factors of a socially assistive robot together with older people Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)., pp 455–460 Werner K, Oberzaucher J, Werner F (2012) Evaluation of human robot interaction factors of a socially assistive robot together with older people Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)., pp 455–460
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K et al (2005) Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 34:614–619 CrossRefPubMed Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K et al (2005) Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 34:614–619 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Social service robots to support independent living
Experiences from a field trial
verfasst von
J. Pripfl
T. Körtner
D. Batko-Klein
D. Hebesberger
M. Weninger
C. Gisinger
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0948-6704
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-016-1067-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen des Bundesverbands Geriatrie

Mitteilungen des Bundesverbands Geriatrie