nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Reviews

verfasst von : Agnes Sturma, Valentin Ritschl, Silke Dennhardt, Tanja Stamm

Erschienen in: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Ist das Ziel eines Forschungsvorhabens, sich mit bereits bestehender Literatur kritisch auseinanderzusetzten, existieren dazu unterschiedliche Verfahren der Literaturstudien und Reviews. Dieser Abschnitt des Buches beschreibt diese unterschiedlichen Arten von Reviews, ihre Durchführung sowie ihre Bedeutung als eigene Forschungsmethode.

Vorheriges Kapitel Quantitative Forschung

Nächstes Kapitel Weitere Forschungsmethoden

Al-Nawas B, Baulig C, Krummenauer F (2010) Von der Übersichtsarbeit zur Meta-Analyse – Möglichkeiten und Risiken. Zeitschrift für zahnärztliche Implantologie 26 (4): 400–404

Angell BJ, Muhunthan J, Irving M, Eades S, Jan S (2014) Global systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of indigenous health interventions. PloS One 9 (11): e111249CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research 8 (1): 19–32

Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J (2008) Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8 (1): 21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bagayoko ND, Brockmeier SF (2012) Current controversies in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Current Orthopaedic Practice 23 (5): 480–485CrossRef

Barroso J, Gollop CJ, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ (2003) The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research 25 (2): 153–178CrossRefPubMed

Bellini JL, Rumrill PD (2009) Research in rehabilitation counseling: a guide to design, methodology, and utilization, 2nd ed. Charles C Thomas, Springfield

Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage, London

Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef

Breuer J, Piso B (2013) Ergotherapie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Literaturübersicht zu Indikationen, Inanspruchnahme und Empfehlungen. HTA-Projektbericht, Nr. 70. Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Helth Technology Assessment, Wien

Case-Smith J, Arbesman M (2008) Evidence based review of intervention for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. Autism Research and Treatment 62 (4): 416–429

Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ (2013) Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13 (48): 1–9

De Souza M, Da Silva M (2010) Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein 8 (1 Pt 1): 102–106CrossRef

Dixon L, Duncan D, Johnson P, Kirkby L, O’Connell H, Taylor H, Deane KHO (2007) Occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3): CD002813

Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ et al. (2006) How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 6 (1): 27–44CrossRef

Gough D (2007) Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 213–228CrossRef

Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R (2005) Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 61 (2): 417–430CrossRef

Hedges H, Cooper LV (2009) Research synthesis as a scientific process. In: Hedges H, Cooper LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 4–16

Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R (2014) Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. Journal of Interprofessional Care 28 (6): 501–506CrossRefPubMed

Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef

Jesson J, Matheson L, Lacey FM (2011) Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. Sage, London

Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2013) Systematische Übersichten und Meta-Analysen: ein Handbuch für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis sowie Experten im Gesundheitswesen. Springer, Heidelberg

Lang R, O’Reilly M, Healy O, Rispoli M, Lydon H, Streusand W et al. (2012) Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 6 (3): 1004–1018CrossRef

Laulan J, Fouquet B, Rodaix C, Jauffret P, Roquelaure Y, Descatha A (2011) Thoracic outlet syndrome: definition, aetiological factors, diagnosis, management and occupational impact. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 21 (3): 366–373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 6 (4): W

Mühlhauser I, Lenz M, Meyer G (2011) Development, appraisal and synthesis of complex interventions – a methodological challenge. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 105 (10): 751–61CrossRefPubMed

Noblit GW, Hare RD (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef

Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K (2005) Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10 Suppl 1: 21–34CrossRef

Ritschl V (2015) Fall prevention through assistive devices among elderly persons – a systematic review. FH Campus Wien

Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM (2001) Using narrative literature reviews to build a scientific knowledge base. Work 16 (2): 165–170PubMed

Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR (2010) Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 35 (3): 399–404. Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/20364059 CrossRefPubMed

Saini M, Shlonsky A (2012) Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef

Walsh D, Downe S (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research : a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (2): 204–211CrossRefPubMed

Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 (5): 546–553CrossRefPubMed

Whittmore R (2005) Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nursing Research 54 (1): 56–62

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R (2013) RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine 11 (1): 20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yu C-H, Mathiowetz V (2014a) Systematic review of occupational therapy – related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Part 1: Activity and participation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68 (1): 27–32CrossRef

Yu C-H, Mathiowetz V (2014b) Systematic review of occupational therapy-related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Part 2: Impairment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68 (1): 33–38CrossRef

Zänger H, Ritschl V (2014) Analyse der Reliabilität und Anwendung von Goniometern zur Erstellung von Anwendungsempfehlungen für die ergotherapeutische Praxis – ein systematischer Review. Ergoscience 9 (1): 12–23

Titel: Reviews
verfasst von: Agnes Sturma
Valentin Ritschl
Silke Dennhardt
Tanja Stamm
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49907-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-49908-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49908-5_8

Springerpflege

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten