An Exploratory Study of Patient Attitudes towards Symptom Reporting in a Primary Care Setting

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate people’s attitude towards providing symptom information electronically before a consultation. Specific areas investigated include a) attitudes and experiences with regards to acquisition of information related to symptoms, b) attitudes towards computer based communication of symptoms to the general practitioner and how they preferred to carry out such reporting, and c) attitudes towards storage, use and presentation of symptom-data in general, and particularly in a symptom based surveillance setting.

Methods: Data was collected from 83 respondents by use of convenience sampling.

Results: The respondents were familiar with using the Internet for health purposes, such as acquisition of information related to their symptoms prior to a consultation. The majority of respondents had a positive attitude towards providing information about their symptoms to the general practitioner’s office as soon as possible after falling ill. Over half of the respondents preferred to use e-mail or a web-interface to perform this task. Eighty four percent were willing to have their symptom data stored in their EPR and 76 percent agreed that the general practitioner might access the symptoms together with the prevalence of matching diseases in order to assist the diagnostic process during the next consultation.

Conclusions: The results of this study support the applicability of electronically mediated pre-consultation systems both for improving primary care consultation and for use in symptom based surveillance, including real-time surveillance.

• References

• 1 Millsopp L, Frackleton S, Lowe D, Rogers SN. A feasibility study of computer-assisted health-related quality of life data collection in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35 (08) 761-764.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Boer H, Steehouder MF, Seydel ER. Increasing the use of e-consultation in primary care: results of an online survey among non-users of e-consultation. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (10) 688-703.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Haugli L, Finset A. Lege-pasient-forholdet ved funksjonelle lidelser. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 2002; 122 (11) 1123 –1125. Article only in Norwegian (The Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association. Physician-patient relations in functional disorders. English abstract available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12043058 Last downloaded: January 14, 2011).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Johansen MA. Data from focus-group interview with 5 GPs. 2009
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Roter DL, Hall JA. Physician’s interviewing styles and medical information obtained from patients. J Gen Intern Med 1987; 2 (05) 325-329.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S. et al. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 53.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2002; 288 (23) 3027-3034.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Vikingstad G, Pribbernow M, Grossman S, Stone AA. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain 2008; 139 (01) 146-157.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Schneider S, Stone AA. Can End-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue?. J Pain 2009; 10 (03) 274-281.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Benoit A, Dykes P, Chang F, Gertman P, Vandever W, Wald J. editors. Using electronic questionnaires to collect patient reported history. AMIA 2007 Symposium, Chicago, IL, November 10-14, 2007
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Buzaglo JS, Millard JL, Ridgway CG, Ross EA, Antaramian SP, Miller SM. et al. An Internet method to assess cancer patient information needs and enhance doctor-patient communication: a pilot study. J Cancer Educ 2007; 22 (04) 233-240.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Porter SC, Cai Z, Gribbons W, Goldmann DA, Kohane IS. The asthma kiosk: a patient-centered technology for collaborative decision support in the emergency department. JAMIA 2004; 11 (06) 458-467.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Porter SC, Kohane IS, Goldmann DA. Parents as partners in obtaining the medication history. JAMIA 2005; 12 (03) 299-305.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Buzaglo JS, Millard JL, Ridgway CG, Ross EA, Antaramian SP, Miller SM. et al. An Internet method to assess cancer patient information needs and enhance doctor-patient communication: A pilot study. J Cancer Educ 2007; 22: 233-240.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Adamson SC, Bachman JW. Pilot study of providing online care in a primary care setting. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85 (08) 704-710.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bachman JW. The patient-computer interview: A neglected tool that can aid the physician. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78 (01) 67-78.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Versel N. Patient histories: How computers help. Med Econ 2004: TCP15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 WHO.. World Health Organization. Report on infectious diseases: Removing Obstacles to Healthy Development. 1999 (Last downloaded: April 3, 2008). Available from: http://www.who.int/infectious-disease-report/index-rpt99.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Jajosky RA, Groseclose SL. Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases. BMC Public Health 2004; 4: 29.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Jansson A, Arneborn M, Skarlund K, Ekdahl K. Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998 – 2002. Scand J Infect Dis 2004; 36 11–12 865-872.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Mandl KD, Overhage JM, Wagner MM, Lober WB, Sebastiani P, Mostashari F. et al. Implementing syndromic surveillance: a practical guide informed by the early experience. JAMIA 2004; 11 (02) 141-150.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Reingold A. If syndromic surveillance is the answer, what is the question?. Biosecur Bioterror 2003; 1 (02) 77-81.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Foldy SL. Linking better surveillance to better outcomes. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53 Suppl 12-17.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Einbinder JS, Bates DW. Leveraging Information Technology to Improve Quality and Safety. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2007. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (01) 22-29.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bellika JG, Sue H, Bird L, Goodchild A, Hasvold T, Hartvigsen G. Properties of a federated epidemiology query system. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (09) 664-676.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Buehler JW, Hopkins RS, Overhage JM, Sosin DM, Tong V. Framework for evaluating public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks: recommendations from the CDC Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep 2004; 53 RR-5 1-11.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Henning KJ. Overwiew of Syndromic Surveillance: What is syndromic surveillance?. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53 Suppl 5-11.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Johansen MA, Scholl J, Hasvold P, Ellingsen G, Bellika JG. “Garbage in, garbage out”: extracting disease surveillance data from epr systems in primary care. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. San Diego, CA, USA: ACM; 2008 pp 525-534.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Berg M, Goorman E. The contextual nature of medical information. Int J Med Inform 1999; 56 1–3 51-60.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Johansen MA, Johnsen JA, Hartvigsen G, Ellingsen G, Bellika JG. Bridging the gap between patients’ expectations and general practitioners’ knowledge through disease surveillance. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150: 423-427.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Abdullah M, Theobald DE, Butler D, Kroenke K, Perkins A, Edgerton S. et al. Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients: An urban and rural survey. BMC Cancer 2005 5(18)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Jimison HB, Sher PP, Jimison JJB. Decision Support for Patients. In: Berner ES. editor. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. Second edition. New York: Springer; 2007. pp 249-261.
  Google Scholar
• 33 Tanaka Y, Shibata S, Ohtuka Y, Hattori M, Aoshima T, Tohyama S. et al. Subjective symptoms acquisition system in a health promotion system for the elderly. Committee of System Development, Council of Japan AMHTS Institutions. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 (03) 238-240.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physicianperformanceandpatientoutcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998; 280 (15) 1339-1346.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120 (02) 135-142.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Elvidge K. Improving pain & symptom management for advanced cancer patients with a clinical decision support system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 169-174.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 van Noort SP, Muehlen M, Rebelo de Andrade H, Koppeschaar C, Lima Lourenco JM, Gomes MG. Gripenet: an internet-based system to monitor influenza-like illness uniformly across Europe. Euro Surveill 2007; 12 (07) E5-6.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Joinson AN. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001; 31: 177-192.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Robinson R, West R. A comparison of computer and questionnaire methods of history-taking in a genitourinary clinic. Psychol Health 1992; 6: 77-84.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Ferriter M. Computer aided interviewing and the psychiatric social history. Soc Work Soc Sci Rev 1993; 4: 255-263.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Webb PM, Zimet GD, Fortenberry JD, Blythe MJ. Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients. J Adolesc Health 1999; 24: 383-388.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Jarlais DD, Paone DC, Milliken J, Turner CF, Miller H, Gribble J. et al. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behavior for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomized trial. The Lancet 1999; 353: 1657-1661.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Hasley S. A comparison of computer-based and personal interviews for gynecologic history update. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85 (04) 494-498.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Michaud P-A, Narring F, Ferron C. Alternative methods in the investigation of adolescent’s sexual life. J Adolesc Health 1999; 25: 84-90.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Bergvik S, Johnsen J-AK, Hasvold T, Rosenvinge JH. Social support in a wired world: Use of online discussion forums in Norway. Nord J Psychiatry 2002; 56 (01) 59-65.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Statistics-Norway-1.. Befolkningen etter kjønn og alder. Tromsø. 1.1. 2010. Prosent. (The population of Tromsø presented according to gender and age). Available from http://www.ssb.no/kommuner/region.cgi?nr=19 Last downloaded: March 16, 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Statistics-Norway-2.. Personer 16 år og over, etter utdanningsnivå og bostedskommune, 2009. (Persons, 16 years or older in accordance with education level and municipality of residence, 2009). Available from http://www.ssb.no/utniv/tab-2010–06–25–02.html Last downloaded: March 16, 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Statistics-Norway-3.. Fakta om utdanning 2011 – nøkkeltall fra 2009. (Facts about education 2011– key figures from 2009). Page 21. Available from http://www.ssb.no/emner/04/02/fakta/fakta2011.pdf Last downloaded: March 16, 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Nossen JP. Hva foregår på legekontorene? Ny statistikk fra NAV. Article only in Norwegian. (What happen at the primary care offices?. New statistics from The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service (NAV)) 2007; 4: 47-52.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology 2002; 12: 1-36.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Benkler Y, Nissenbaum H. Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy 2006; 14 (04) 394-419.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Bourgeois FT, Porter SC, Valim C, Jackson T, Cook EF, Mandl KD. The value of patient self-report for disease surveillance. JAMIA 2007; 14 (06) 765-771.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Epidemiological data can be gathered with world wide web. Bmj 1998; 316 7124 72.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11 (01) e11.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Friesema IH, Koppeschaar CE, Donker GA, Dijkstra F, van Noort SP, Smallenburg R. et al. Internet-based monitoring of influenza-like illness in the general population: experience of five influenza seasons in The Netherlands. Vaccine 2009; 27 (45) 6353-6357.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Marquet RL, Bartelds AI, van Noort SP, Koppeschaar CE, Paget J, Schellevis FG. et al. Internet-based monitoring of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the general population of the Netherlands during the 2003 – 2004 influenza season. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 242.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar