Thromb Haemost 2006; 95(05): 914-915
DOI: 10.1160/TH06-01-0029
Letters to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

High incidence of isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli on multi-slice spiral CT: A comparative clinical study

Maarten G. J. Thomeer
1   Erasmus University Medical Center, Radiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Peter M. T. Pattynama
1   Erasmus University Medical Center, Radiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Ieneke J. C. Hartmann
1   Erasmus University Medical Center, Radiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2   University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Gerard J. Kieft
3   Leyenburg Hospital, Radiology, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Marco J. L. Van Strijen
4   Leiden University Medical center, Radiology, Leiden, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 17 January 2006

Accepted after resubmission 03 April 2006

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

 

 
  • References

  • 1 Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou Kh. et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 2012-7.
  • 2 Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O. et al. Multidetectorrow computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1760-8.
  • 3 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F. et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 1996; 200: 699-706.
  • 4 van Strijen M J, de Monye W, Schiereck J. et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 307-14.
  • 5 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L. et al. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique-comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1992; 185: 381-7.
  • 6 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D. et al. Spiral CT of pulmonary embolism: technical considerations and interpretive pitfalls. J Thorac Imaging 1997; 12: 103-17.
  • 7 Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L. Clinicians’ response to radiologists’ reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. AmJ Roentgenol 2005; 184: 623-8.
  • 8 Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G. et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 2002; 360: 1914-20.
  • 9 de Monye W, van Strijen MJ, Huisman MV. et al. Suspected pulmonary embolism: prevalence and anatomic distribution in 487 consecutive patients. Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) Group. Radiology 2000; 215: 184-8.
  • 10 Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR. et al. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. Radiology 1996; 199: 31-5.
  • 11 Diffin DC, Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP. et al. Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 1085-9.
  • 12 Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch. Radiology 1999; 210: 689-91.
  • 13 Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK. et al. Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 2002; 222: 483-90.
  • 14 Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I. et al. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis?. Radiology 2001; 219: 629-36.
  • 15 Goodman LR. Small pulmonary emboli: what do we know?. Radiology 2005; 234: 654-8.