Introductory Experience with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS®; Medtronic Minimed®) in Detecting Hyperglycemia by Comparing the Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in Non-Pregnant Women and in Pregnant Women with Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Gestational Diabetes

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective: To assess the detection rate of hyperglycemia with a continuous glucose monitoring system compared to a self-monitoring blood glucose profile in non-pregnant, non-diabetic pregnant women, and patients with impaired glucose tolerance or gestational diabetes..

Methods: Eight non-pregnant (NP) and 56 pregnant women (17 dietary-treated gestational diabetics (GDM), 15 women with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 24 non-diabetic pregnant women (NDP)) underwent a 72-hour measurement with the CGMS® (Medtronic Minimed®, Northridge, CA, USA). Self-monitored blood glucose measurements, performed 30 minutes before and 120 minutes after each meal, were compared to the duration of hyperglycemia monitored by the continuous glucose monitoring system.

Results: No clinically observable infection was found at the subcutaneous tissue where the electrode was placed. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in body mass index, HbA1c, and in gestational age, but not in age or parity. Using the self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), 88 % (7/8) of the NP and 54 % (13/24) of the NDP had no measurement above 6.7 mmol/l. However, 17 % (4/24) of the NDP and 40 % (6/15) of the IGT showed more than two measurements above 6.7 mmol/l compared to 24 % (4/17) of the dietary-treated GDM. The differences between these groups were not significant (p = 0.21). The mean durations (± SD) of hyperglycemia above 6.7 mmol/l/24 h were: NP 111 ± 120 min, NDP 138 ± 120 min, IGT 381.8 ± 295 min, and GDM 190 ± 155 min, p = 0.017; above 7.8 mmol/l/24 h NP 24 ± 49 min, NDP 38 ± 47 min, IGT 170.7 ± 190 min, and GDM 64 ± 88 min, p = 0.016; and above 8.9 mmol/l/24 h NP 9.3 ± 25 min, NDP 7.5 ± 14 min, IGT 59 ± 77 min, and GDM 14 ± 21 min, p = 0.026. There was no significant difference in the fetal outcome or rate of birth percentiles using the sensor data.

Conclusions: The use of the sensor in pregnant women is unproblematic. a) The CGMS® detected more frequent and longer durations of hyperglycemia in GDM compared to non-diabetic pregnant women than the SMBG. b) Women with an IGT exhibited higher glucose levels than patients with gestational diabetes. c) The clinical importance of these hyperglycemic intervals, e.g. with respect to the risk for macrosomia, must be assessed in larger trials.

References

• 1 American Diabetes Association . Gestational diabetes mellitus.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 S77-S79
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cousins L, Rigg L, Hollingsworth D, Brink G, Aurand J, Yen S S. The 24-hour excursion and diurnal rhythm of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide in normal pregnancy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;  136 483-488
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Combs C A, Gunderson E, Kitzmiller J L, Gavin L A, Main E K. Relationship of fetal macrosomia to maternal postprandial glucose control during pregnancy.  Diabetes Care. 1992;  15 1251-1257
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 De Veciana M, Major C A, Morgna M A, Asrat T, Toohey J S, Lien J M, Evans A T. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy.  N Engl J Med. 1995;  333 1237-1241
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 German Diabetes Association .Guidelines of the working group Diabetes and Pregnancy (2001). http://www.deutsche-diabetes-gesellschaft.de, updated June 2001. 
  Google Scholar
• 6 Gillmer M D, Beard R W, Brooke F M, Oakley N W. Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. Part I. Diurnal plasma glucose profile in normal and diabetic women.  Br Med J. 1975;  3 399-402
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Jovanovic L. The role of continuous glucose monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus.  Diabetes Tech Ther. 2001;  2 S67-S71
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kjos S L, Buchanan T A. Gestational diabetes mellitus.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  34 1749-1756
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Koschinsky T, Heinemann L. Sensors for glucose monitoring: technical and clinical aspects.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;  17 113-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Metzger B E, Coustan D R. The Organizing Committee. Summary and recommendations of the fourth international workshop conference on gestational diabetes mellitus.  Diabetes Care. 1998;  21 B161-B167
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Neiger R, Coustan D R. The role of repeat glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  165 787-790
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 O'Sullivan J B, Mahan C M. Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy.  Diabetes. 1963;  13 278-285
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Parretti E, Mecacci F, Papini M, Cioni R, Carignani L, Mignosa M, La Torre P, Mello G. Third-trimester maternal glucose levels from diurnal profiles in nondiabetic pregnancies.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 1319-1323
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Phelps R L, Metzger B E, Freinkel N. Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. XVII. Diurnal profiles of plasma glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, triglycerides, cholesterol, and individual amino acids in late normal pregnancy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;  140 730-736
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Sivan E, Weisz B, Homko C J, Reece A, Schiff E. One or two hours postprandial glucose measurements: Are they the same?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  185 604-607
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Verma A, Mitchell B F, Demianczuk N, Flowerdew G, Okun N B. Relationship between plasma glucose levels in glucose intolerant women and newborn macrosomia.  J Matern Fetal Med. 1997;  6 187-193
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

MD Kai J. Bühling

Charité University Medicine Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Clinic of Obstetrics

Augustenburger Platz 1

13353 Berlin

Germany

Phone: + 4930450564293

Fax: + 49 3 04 50 56 49 01

Email: kai.buehling@charite.de