Zentralbl Chir 2003; 128(12): 1080-1085
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44844
Originalarbeiten und Übersichten

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Laparoskopische Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms - Wunschdenken oder Realismus?

Laparoscopic Therapy of Colorectal Cancer - Wishful Thinking or Realism?R. Keller1 , U. J. Roblick1 , O. Schwandner1 , H.-P. Bruch1
  • 1Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 January 2004 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Laparoskopische Resektionen am Kolon und Rektum sind bei benignen Erkrankungen etabliert. Ihr Vorteil gegenüber der offen-konventionellen Operationstechnik liegt in reduzierter postoperativer Schmerzsymptomatik, geringerer Beeinträchtigung der pulmonalen sowie gastrointestinalen Funktionen und einer kürzeren Rekonvaleszenz. Kurative Eingriffe in minimalinvasiver Technik werden beim kolorektalen Karzinom bezüglich Radikalität und Tumorzellverschleppung noch immer kontrovers diskutiert. Die onkologischen Standards der konventionellen Chirurgie können bei laparoskopischen Resektionen am Kolon und Rektum ohne Einschränkung eingehalten werden. In den jüngeren Vergleichstudien werden keine erhöhten Rezidiv- oder niedrigere Überlebensraten nach minimalinvasivem Vorgehen publiziert. Den Nachweis eines vergleichbaren Langzeitüberlebens müssen die prospektiv randomisierten Multizenterstudien in den nächsten Jahren erbringen.

Abstract

The laparoscopic resection of the colon and rectum is established for surgery of benign diseases. The main advantages compared to the open-conventional operation technique are reduced postoperative pain, reduced negative influences on pulmonary and gastrointestinal functions as well as a shorter reconvalescence. Minimally invasive curative resections of colorectal carcinomas are still controversially discussed concerning sufficient radicality and the spread of tumor cells. The given oncological standards of the conventional approach can be kept without restriction when resections of the colon and rectum are performed laparoscopically. Newer comparative studies do not describe raised recurrence or lower survival rates following the minimal-invasive procedure. In the coming years prospective randomized multicenter studies must give proof whether or not the long-term survival is comparable with the conventional approach.

Literatur

  • 1 Baker R, White E, Titu L, Duthie G, Lee P, Monson J. Does laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum compromise long-term survival?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1481-1485
  • 2 B ärlehner E, Anders S. Laparoskopische kolorektale Chirurgie in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer Umfrage.  Chirugische Gastroenterologie. 2001;  17 1-3
  • 3 Bennett C, Stryker S, Ferreira M, Adams J, Beart R. The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1 194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.  Arch Surg. 1997;  132 41-44
  • 4 Berends F, Kazemier G, Bonjer H, Lange J. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy.  Lancet. 1994;  344 58
  • 5 Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.  Ann Surg. 2002;  236 759-766
  • 6 Bruch H, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A five-year experience.  Dig Surg. 1999;  16 45-54
  • 7 Bruch H, Schwandner O. Laparoskopische Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: Sind die onkologischen Standards einzuhalten?.  Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. 2001;  17 4-10
  • 8 Bruch H, Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Roblick U. Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph-node dissection in colorectal cancer.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999;  384 167-175
  • 9 Feussner H, Siewert J. Reduction of surgical access trauma: reliable advantages.  Chirurg. 2001;  72 236-244
  • 10 Gutt C, Riemer V, Kim Z, Jacobi C, Paolucci V, Lorenz M. Impact of laparoscopic colonic resection on tumour growth and spread in an experimental model.  Br J Surg. 1999;  86 1180-1184
  • 11 Hermanek P. Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 559-562
  • 12 Hewett P, Texler M, Anderson D, King G, Chatterton B. In vivo real-time analysis of intraperitoneal radiolabeled tumor cell movement during laparoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 875-876
  • 13 Hong D, Tabet J, Anvari M. Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 10-18
  • 14 Hughes E, McDermott F, Polglase A, Johnson W. Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;  26 571-572
  • 15 Jacobs M, Verdeja J, Goldstein H. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;  1 144-150
  • 16 Jeekel J. Developments in colorectal cancer surgery.  Eur J Cancer. 1995;  31 A 1379-1381
  • 17 Jessup J, McGinnis L, Steele G, Menck H, Winchester D. The National Cancer Data Base. Report on colon cancer.  Cancer. 1996;  78 918-926
  • 18 Jessup J, Stewart A, Menck H. The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of care for adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 1985-95.  Cancer. 1998;  83 2408-2418
  • 19 Johnstone P, Rohde D, Swartz S, Fetter J, Wexner S. Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy.  J Clin Oncol. 1996;  14 1950-1956
  • 20 Jones D, Guo L, Reinhard M, Soper N, Philpott G, Connett J, Fleshman J. Impact of pneumoperitoneum on trocar site implantation of colon cancer in hamster model.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 1182-1188
  • 21 Lacy A, Garcia-Valdecasas J, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique J, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2002;  359 2224-2229
  • 22 Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini A, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Minervini S, Campagnacci R. Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 596-602
  • 23 Lujan H, Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Viamonte M, Hartmann R. Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 491-501
  • 24 Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, Fielding G, Luck A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 867-872
  • 25 Mavrantonis C, Wexner S, Nogueras J, Weiss E, Potenti F, Pikarsky A. Current attitudes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1152-1157
  • 26 Melotti G, Tamborrino E, Lazzaretti M, Bonilauri S, Mecheri F, Piccoli M. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.  Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;  16 332-336
  • 27 Neuhaus S, Ellis T, Rofe A, Pike G, Jamieson G, Watson D. Tumor implantation following laparoscopy using different insufflation gases.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 1300-1302
  • 28 Pikarsky A, Rosenthal R, Weiss E, Wexner S. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 558-562
  • 29 Reilly W, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand H, Bolton J, O' Connell M. Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 200-207
  • 30 Schlachta C, Mamazza J, PA S, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin E. Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 217-222
  • 31 Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch H. Advanced age-indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 356-362
  • 32 Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch H. Ist die Lymphknotenausbeute laparoskopischer Resektionen beim kolorektalen Karzinom adäquat?.  Minimal Invasive Chirurgie. 2002;  11 44-48
  • 33 Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Killaitis C, Bruch H. A case-control-study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1999;  14 158-163
  • 34 Shoup M, Brennan M, Karpeh M, Gillern S, McMahon R, Conlon K. Port site metastasis after diagnostic laparoscopy for upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies: an uncommon entity.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;  9 632
  • 35 Tang C, Eu K, Tai B, Soh J, MacHin D, Seow-Choen F. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 801-807
  • 36 Vukasin P, Ortega A, Greene F, Steele G, Simons A, Anthone G, Weston L, Beart R. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 20-23
  • 37 Watson D, Mathew G, Ellis T, Baigrie C, Rofe A, Jamieson G. Gasless laparoscopy may reduce the risk of port-site metastases following laparoscopic tumor surgery.  Arch Surg. 1997;  132 166-168
  • 38 Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1689-1694
  • 39 Wexner S, Cohen S. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 295-298
  • 40 Winslow E, Fleshman J, Birnbaum E, Brunt L. Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1420-1425
  • 41 Zmora O, Gervaz P, Wexner S. Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 788-793

Prof. Dr. med. H.-P. Bruch

Klinik für Chirurgie

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

Campus Lübeck

Ratzeburger Allee 160

23538 Lübeck

Phone: (+49) (0) 45 15 00 20 01

Fax: (+49) (0) 45 15 00 20 69

Email: Bruch@medinf.mu-luebeck.de

    >