Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 23(1): 011-018
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20584
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Interfacility Transports

Thomas H. Blackwell
  • The Center for Prehospital Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; Mecklenburg EMS Agency, Charlotte, North Carolina; and University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 March 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

Financial pressures exerted by managed care organizations toward hospitals to improve efficiencies and to lower total healthcare costs continue to force physicians and administrators to reevaluate operations and practices. This shifting of risk exposure from insurers to providers has resulted in many mergers, acquisitions, and affiliations, so as to form integrated health systems that reduce repetition and duplication of services.[1] Therefore, as these integrated systems develop, along with the emergence of tertiary care, regional referral, and specialty hospitals, the need for patient transfers between such facilities will expand. The decision to move patients between facilities is a multicomponent process comprising health, safety, financial, and legal concerns.

Interfacility transportation of patients has been performed over the past 20 to 30 years. Whereas ground transport services were prominent in the 1970s, air medical programs using helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft have recently become widespread.[2] Both hospital-based and private agencies have continued to develop programs for efficiently and expeditiously transporting critically ill or injured patients, many requiring complex life-support devices. The Practice Management Committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians recently updated the 1990 policy statement on interfacility transfers,[3] and two position statements are available from the National Association of EMS Physicians on criteria for air medical transport[4] and medical direction for interfacility transport services.[5]

This review provides an overview of transportation systems and services available and assists physicians in understanding the various modes and characteristics of systems available. Personnel configurations and capabilities, physiological limitations, inherent requirements for equipment and patient preparation, and legal issues involved with transferring patients are also outlined.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bisciglia J M, Binder C, Bartholomew J, Lavery R F. Think before you act: a national survey of interhospital transfer policies and practices.  Air Med J . 1998;  17 157-159
  • 2 Bennett J B, Hill J G, Long B, Bruhn P S, Haun M M, Parsons J A. Interhospital transport of the patient on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support.  Ann Thorac Sug . 1994;  57 107-111
  • 3 American College of Emergency Physicians. Appropriate interhospital patient transfer.  Ann Emerg Med . 1993;  22 766
  • 4 Carrubba C C, Hunt R C, Benson N H. Criteria for prehospital air medical transport: nontrauma and pediatric considerations.  Prehosp Dis Med . 1994;  9 140-141
  • 5 Shelton S L, Swor R A, Domeier R M, Lucas R. Medical direction of interfacility transports.  Prehosp Emerg Care . 2000;  4 361-364
  • 6 Brink L W, Neuman B, Wynn J. Air transport.  Pediatr Clin North Am . 1993;  40 439-456
  • 7 Mertlich G, Quaal S J. Air transport of the patient requiring intra-aortic balloon pumping.  Crit Care Nurs Clin of NA . 1989;  1 443-458
  • 8 Reddick E J. Aeromedical evacuation.  Am Fam Phys . 1977;  16 154-160
  • 9 Wuerz R, Meador S. Adverse events during interfacility transfers by ground advanced life support services .  1994;  9 50-53
  • 10 Domeier R M, Hill J D, Simpson R D. The development and evaluation of a paramedic-staffed mobile intensive care unit for interfacility patient transport.  Prehosp Dis Med . 1996;  11 37-43
  • 11 . 42 USC 1395dd.  The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
  • 12 Bitterman R A. EMTALA. In: Henry GL, Sullivan DJ, eds. Emergency Medicine Risk Management: A Comprehensive Review 2nd ed. Dallas Texas: American College of Emergency Physicians 1997: 103-123
  • 13 Bitterman R A. Transferring accepting patients under EMTALA. In: Bitterman RA ed. Providing Emergency Care under Federal Law: EMTALA Dallas Texas: American College of Emergency Physicians 2000: 103-123
  • 14 Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. JCAHO Accreditation Manual Emergency Services Standard ER.5.1.2.6 1998
  • 15 LoCicero J, Hartz R S, Sanders J H, Hueter D C, McDonough T J, Michaelis L L. Interhospital transport of patients with ongoing intra-aortic balloon pumping.  Am J Cardiol . 1985;  56 59-61
  • 16 McBride L R, Lowdermilk G A, Fiore A C, Moroney D A, Brannan J A, Swartz M T. Cardiopulmonary support physiology: transfer of patients receiving advanced mechanical circulatory support.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 2000;  119 1015-1020
  • 17 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Available at: www.elso.med.umich.edu
  • 18 Faulkner S C. Mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am . 1995;  7 259-266
  • 19 Cornish J D, Carter J M, Gerstmann D R, Null D M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a means of stabilizing transportinghigh risk neonates.  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs . 1991;  37 564-568
  • 20 Rossaint R, Pappert H, Gerlach K, Lewandowski D, Keh D, Falke K. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for transport of hypoxaemic patients with severe ARDS.  Brit J Anaesth . 1997;  78 241-246
  • 21 Day S E, Chapman R A. Transport of critically ill patients in need of extracorporeal life support.  Crit Care Clin North Am . 1992;  8 581-595
    >