Semin Vasc Med 2001; 01(2): 175-180
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18485
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Fibrin D-Dimer Measurement in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

Philippe de Moerloose1 , Martin H. Prins2
  • 1Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Academic Hospital Maastricht, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 November 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

Due to increased awareness among physicians, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients clinically suspected of the disease has steadily decreased during the past 15 years. This has led to the development of simple diagnostic tools in an attempt to reduce the number of invasive or costly exams needed to manage these patients. D-dimer (DD) measurement has proven to be a simple and very useful test to exclude PE and several strategies combining DD with clinical probability and other exams have been validated in large outcome studies. The problem faced by many physicians is the choice of the specific DD test and its more appropriate position in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of PE. This article focuses on these questions and also provides some limitations of DD use, such as its poor specificity in hospitalized and elderly patients.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bounameaux H, de Moerloose P, Perrier A, Miron M-J. D-dimer testing in suspected venous thromboembolism: an update.  Q J Med . 1997;  90 437-442
  • 2 de Moerloose P, Michiels J J, Bounameaux H. The place of D-dimer testing in an integrated approach of patients suspected of pulmonary embolism.  Semin Thromb Haemos . 1998;  24 409-412
  • 3 The PIOPED Investigators. Value of ventilation-perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism.  JAMA . 1990;  263 2753-2759
  • 4 Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in outpatients by sequential noninvasive tools.  Semin Thromb Hemost . 2001;  27 25-32
  • 5 Hull R D, Raskob G E, Ginsberg J S. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.  Arch Intern Med . 1994;  154 289-297
  • 6 Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, D-dimer and ultrasonography: a management study.  Arch Intern Med . 1996;  156 531-536
  • 7 Wells P S, Ginsberg J S, Anderson D R. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  129 997-1005
  • 8 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron M J. Noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary venous thromboembolism in outpatients.  Lancet . 1999;  353 190-195
  • 9 de Groot R M, van Marwijk M, Pouwels J G, Engelage A H, Kuipers B F, Büller H R. The use of a rapid D-dimer blood test in the diagnostic work-up for pulmonary embolism: a management study.  Thromb Haemost . 1999;  82 1588-1592
  • 10 van der Graaf F, van der Borne H, van der Kolk M, de Wild J P, Janssen G WT, van Uum H M S. Exclusion of deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer testing. Comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard.  Thromb Haemost . 2000;  83 191-198
  • 11 Janssen M CH, Heebels A E, de Metz M. Reliability of five rapid D-dimer assays compared to ELISA in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis.  Thromb Haemost . 1997;  77 262-266
  • 12 Freyburger G, Trillaud H, Labrouche S. D-dimer strategy in thrombosis exclusion. A gold standard study in 100 patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: 8 DD methods compared.  Thromb Haemost . 1998;  79 32-37
  • 13 de Moerloose P. D-dimer assays for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism: which test for which diagnostic strategy?.  Thromb Haemost . 2000;  83 180-181
  • 14 Mauron T, Baumgartner I, Z'Brun A. SimpliRED D-dimer assay: comparability of capillary and citrated venous whole blood, between-assay variability, and performance of the test for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients.  Thromb Haemost . 1998;  79 1217-1219
  • 15 Reber G, de Moerloose P. D-dimer assays for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism.  Semin Thromb Haemos . 2000;  26 619-624
  • 16 de Moerloose P, Minazio P, Reber G, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. D-dimer determination to exclude pulmonary embolism: a two-step approach using latex assays as a screening tool.  Thromb Haemost . 1994;  72 89-91
  • 17 Perrier A, Buswell L, Bounameaux H. Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive diagnostic aids in suspected pulmonary embolism.  Arch Intern Med . 1997;  157 2309-2316
  • 18 Raimondi P, Bongard O, de Moerloose P, Reber G, Waldvogel F, Bounameaux H. D-dimer plasma concentration in various clinical conditions: implication for the use of this test in the diagnostic approach of venous thromboembolism.  Thromb Res . 1993;  69 125-130
  • 19 Miron M-J, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Contribution of noninvasive evaluation to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients.  Eur Resp J . 1999;  13 1365-1370
  • 20 Freyburger G, Trillaud H, Labrouche S, Gauthier P, Javorshi S, Grenier N. Rapid D-dimer ELISA testing in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.  Clin Appl Thromb Haemost . 2000;  6 77-81
  • 21 Tardy B, Tardy-Poncet B, Viallon A. Evaluation of D-dimer ELISA test in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.  Thromb Haemost . 1998;  79 38-41
  • 22 Masotti L, Ceccarelli E, Capelli E, Forconi S. Plasma D-dimer levels in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.  Thromb Res . 2000;  98 577-579
  • 23 Righini M, Goehring C, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Effects of age on the performances of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism.  Am J Med . 2000;  109 357-361
  • 24 Righini M, de Moerloose P, Reber G, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Should the D-dimer cut-off value be increased in elderly patients suspected of pulmonary embolism?.  Thromb Haemost . 2001;  85 744-745
    >