Pulmonary Embolism: From Clinical Presentation to Clinical Probability Assessment

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The rehabilitation of clinical assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is certainly one of the major breakthroughs of the last decade in the field of pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis. Although the value of isolated clinical findings in suspected PE is limited due to the poor sensitivity and specificity of its symptoms and signs, their combination, whether empiric or explicit through prediction rules, allows a fairly accurate assessment of the likelihood of the disease in a given patient. This allows the identification of a large subset of patients with a low prevalence of the disease in whom a combination of noninvasive tests rules out PE effectively despite these tests' limited individual sensitivity. The best validated example is the combination of a low probability lung scan and a normal venous compression ultrasound in a patient with low clinical probability of PE, which is associated to a low 1 to 2% 3-month risk of VTE in such patients left untreated by anticoagulants. Finally, clinical assessment contributes significantly to the cost savings associated with modern noninvasive strategies.

REFERENCES

• 1 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale.  Thromb Haemost . 2000;  83 657-660
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Anderson Jr A F, Wheeler H B, Goldberg R J. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.  Arch Intern Med . 1991;  151 933-938
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation-perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism.  JAMA . 1990;  263 2753-2759
  Google Scholar
• 4 Wells P S, Anderson D R, Bormani J. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management.  Lancet . 1997;  350 1795-1798
  Google Scholar
• 5 Wells P S, Ginsberg J S, Anderson D R. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  129 997-1005
  Google Scholar
• 6 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron M J. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients.  Lancet . 1999;  353 190-195
  Google Scholar
• 7 Bounameaux H, de Moerloose P, Perrier A, Miron M J. D-dimer testing in suspected venous thromboembolism: an update.  QJM . 1997;  90 437-442
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kearon C, Ginsberg J S, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  129 1044-1049
  Google Scholar
• 9 Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D. Performances of helical computed tomography in unselected patients with suspected pulmonry embolism.  Ann Intern Med . 2001;  135 88-97
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Rathbun S W, Raskob G E, Whitsett T L. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.  Ann Intern Med . 2000;  132 227-232
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Thames M D, Alpert J S, Dalen J E. Syncope in patients with pulmonary embolism.  JAMA . 1977;  238 2509-2511
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Koeleman B P, Reitsma P H, Bertina R M. Familial thrombophilia: a complex genetic disorder.  Semin Hematol . 1997;  34 256-264
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Celi A, Palla A, Petruzzelli S. Prospective study of a standardized questionnaire to improve clinical estimate of pulmonary embolism.  Chest . 1989;  95 332-337
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Bell W R, Simon T L, DeMets D L. The clinical features of submassive and massive pulmonary embolism.  Am J Med . 1977;  62 355-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Goodall R JR, Greenfield L J. Clinical correlations in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.  Ann Surg . 1980;  191 219-223
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Hoellerich V L, Wigton R S. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism using clinical findings.  Arch Intern Med . 1986;  146 1699-1704
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Miniati M, Prediletto R, Formichi B. Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 1999;  159 864-871
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Perrier A, Miron M J, Desmarais S. Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography?.  Arch Intern Med . 2000;  160 512-516
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Poulose K P, Reba R C, Gilday D L, Deland F H, Wagner H N. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. A correlative study of the clinical, scan, and angiographic findings.  BMJ . 1970;  3 67-71
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Stein P D, Willis P WD, De Mets L D. History and physical examination in acute pulmonary embolism in patients without pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease.  Am J Cardiol . 1981;  47 218-223
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Stein P D, Terrin M L, Hales C A. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease.  Chest . 1991;  100 598-603
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Stein P D, Henry J W. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism stratified according to their presenting syndromes.  Chest . 1997;  112 974-979
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Elliott C G, Goldhaber S Z, Visani L, DeRosa M. Chest radiographs in acute pulmonary embolism. Results from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry.  Chest . 2000;  118 33-38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Stein P D, Goldhaber S Z, Henry J W. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient in the assessment of acute pulmonary embolism.  Chest . 1995;  107 139-143
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Rodger M A, Carrier M, Jones G N. Diagnostic value of arterial blood gas measurement in suspected pulmonary embolism.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2000;  162 2105-2108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Rodger M, Makropoulos D, Turek M. Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolism.  Am J Cardiol . 2000;  86(A10) 807-809
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Wells P S, Anderson D R, Rodger M. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients' probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.  Thromb Haemost . 2000;  83 416-420
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Wicki J, Perneger T V, Junod A, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score.  Arch Intern Med . 2001;  161 92-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Wasson J H, Sox H C. Clinical prediction rules. Have they come of age?.  JAMA . 1996;  275 641-642
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 McGinn T, Randolph A, Richardson S, Sackett D. Clinical prediction guides.  ACP J Club . 1998;  128 A14-15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Wasson J H, Sox H C, Neff R K, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.  N Engl J Med . 1985;  313 793-799
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Ginsberg J S, Wells P S, Kearon C. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid whole-blood assay for D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  129 1006-1011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Righini M, Goehring C, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism.  Am J Med . 2000;  109 357-361
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A. Contribution of D-dimer plasma measurement and lower-limb venous ultrasound to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a decision analysis model.  Am Heart J . 1994;  127 624-635
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Hull R D, Feldstein W, Stein P D, Pineo G F. Cost-effectiveness of pulmonary embolism diagnosis.  Arch Intern Med . 1996;  156 68-72
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Oudkerk M, van Beek R J, van Putten L J W, Büller H R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of various strategies in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism.  Arch Intern Med . 1993;  153 947-954
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Perrier A, Buswell L, Bounameaux H. Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive diagnostic aids in suspected pulmonary embolism.  Arch Intern Med . 1997;  157 2309-2316
  Google Scholar
• 38 van Erkel R A, van Rossum B A, Bloem J L, Kievit J, Pattynama P M. Spiral CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis.  Radiology . 1996;  201 29-36
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Perrier A, Sarasin F P, Howarth N, Bounameaux H. Diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism including helical computed tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.  J Gen Intern Med . 2001;  16(Suppl) 164
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Sanson B J, Lijmer J G, Mac Gillavry R M, Turkstra F, Prins M H, Büller H R. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE Study Group.  Thromb Haemost . 2000;  83 199-203
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Worsley D F, Alavi A, Palevsky H I, Kundel H L. Comparison of diagnostic performance with ventilation-perfusion lung imaging in different patient populations.  Radiology . 1996;  199 481-483
  PubMedGoogle Scholar