Semin Thromb Hemost 2024; 50(03): 328-341
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779672
Review Article

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism by Cancer Type: A Network Meta-Analysis

Marissa B. Betts
1   Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts
,
Xuejun Liu
2   Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, New Jersey
3   Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Daniela R. Junqueira
1   Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts
,
Kyle Fahrbach
1   Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts
,
Binod Neupane
1   Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts
,
Sarah Ronnebaum
1   Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts
,
Amol D. Dhamane
2   Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer.

Abstract

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Comparing tumor-specific VTE risk is complicated by factors such as surgery, disease stage, and chemotherapy. Network meta-analysis (NMA) using cancer types as network nodes enabled us to estimate VTE rates by leveraging comparisons across cancer types while adjusting for baseline VTE risk in individual studies. This study was conducted to estimate the risk of VTE by cancer type and factors influencing VTE risk. The Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library repositories were systematically searched to identify clinical trials and observational studies published from 2005 to 2022 that assessed the risk of primary cancer-related VTE among two or more distinct cancer types. Studies with similar cancer populations and study methods reporting VTE occurring within 1 year of diagnosis were included in the NMA. Relative VTE rates across cancer types were estimated with random-effects Bayesian NMAs. Absolute VTE rates were calculated from these estimates using the average VTE incidence in lung cancer (the most frequently reported type) as the “anchor.” From 2,603 records reviewed, 30 studies were included in this NMA. The general network described 3,948,752 patients and 18 cancer types: 3.1% experienced VTE within 1 year of diagnosis, with cancer-specific rates ranging from 0.7 to 7.4%. Consistent with existing VTE risk prediction tools, pancreatic cancer was associated with higher-than-average VTE risk. Other cancer types with high VTE risk were brain and ovarian cancers. The relative rankings of VTE risk for certain cancers changed based on disease stage and/or receipt of chemotherapy or surgery.

Ethical Standards

This study followed the methodology of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA).[29]


Data Availability Statement

The a priori–developed study protocol and statistical analysis plan are available from the corresponding author. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Authors' Contributions

Concept and design: M.B., X.L., D.R.J., K.F., A.D.D.


Data acquisition, analysis interpretation, and visualization: M.B., D.R.J., K.F., B.N., S.R.


Statistical analysis: K.F., B.N.


Drafting of the manuscript: M.B., D.R.J., S.R.


Project administration: X.L., D.R.J.


Critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
23 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Mulder FI, Candeloro M, Kamphuisen PW. et al; CAT-Prediction Collaborators. The Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica 2019; 104 (06) 1277-1287
  • 2 Lyman GH, Culakova E, Poniewierski MS, Kuderer NM. Morbidity, mortality and costs associated with venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer. Thromb Res 2018; 164 (Suppl. 01) S112-S118
  • 3 Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton III LJ. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160 (06) 809-815
  • 4 Walker AJ, Card TR, West J, Crooks C, Grainge MJ. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer - a cohort study using linked United Kingdom databases. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49 (06) 1404-1413
  • 5 Weitz JI, Haas S, Ageno W. et al; GARFIELD-VTE Investigators. Cancer associated thrombosis in everyday practice: perspectives from GARFIELD-VTE. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020; 50 (02) 267-277
  • 6 Abdol Razak NB, Jones G, Bhandari M, Berndt MC, Metharom P. Cancer-associated thrombosis: an overview of mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10 (10) 380
  • 7 Ay C, Pabinger I, Cohen AT. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: burden, mechanisms, and management. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117 (02) 219-230
  • 8 Horsted F, West J, Grainge MJ. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2012; 9 (07) e1001275
  • 9 Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38 (05) 496-520
  • 10 Farge D, Frere C, Connors JM. et al; International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC) Advisory Panel. 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23 (07) e334-e347
  • 11 Elshoury A, Schaefer JK, Lim MY, Skalla DP, Streiff MB. Update on guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20 (13) 1-8
  • 12 Overvad TF, Ording AG, Nielsen PB. et al. Validation of the Khorana score for predicting venous thromboembolism in 40 218 patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy. Blood Adv 2022; 6 (10) 2967-2976
  • 13 Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, Lyman GH, Francis CW. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 2008; 111 (10) 4902-4907
  • 14 Ay C, Dunkler D, Marosi C. et al. Prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Blood 2010; 116 (24) 5377-5382
  • 15 Sanfilippo KM, Carson KR, Wang TF. et al. Evaluation of the Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2022; 6 (01) e12634
  • 16 Verso M, Agnelli G, Barni S, Gasparini G, LaBianca R. A modified Khorana risk assessment score for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: the PROTECHT score. Intern Emerg Med 2012; 7 (03) 291-292
  • 17 van Es N, Di Nisio M, Cesarman G. et al. Comparison of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Haematologica 2017; 102 (09) 1494-1501
  • 18 Guman NAM, van Geffen RJ, Mulder FI. et al. Evaluation of the Khorana, PROTECHT, and 5-SNP scores for prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Thromb Haemost 2021; 19 (12) 2974-2983
  • 19 Khorana AA, DeSancho MT, Liebman H, Rosovsky R, Connors JM, Zwicker J. Prediction and prevention of cancer-associated thromboembolism. Oncologist 2021; 26 (01) e2-e7
  • 20 Cella CA, Di Minno G, Carlomagno C. et al. Preventing venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients: the ONKOTEV study. Oncologist 2017; 22 (05) 601-608
  • 21 Gerotziafas GT, Taher A, Abdel-Razeq H. et al; COMPASS–CAT Working Group. A predictive score for thrombosis associated with breast, colorectal, lung, or ovarian cancer: the prospective COMPASS-Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Study. Oncologist 2017; 22 (10) 1222-1231
  • 22 Douce DR, Holmes CE, Cushman M, MacLean CD, Ades S, Zakai NA. Risk factors for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: the venous thromboembolism prevention in the ambulatory cancer clinic (VTE-PACC) study. J Thromb Haemost 2019; 17 (12) 2152-2159
  • 23 Cohen AT, Katholing A, Rietbrock S, Bamber L, Martinez C. Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer: a population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117 (01) 57-65
  • 24 Grosse SD, Nelson RE, Nyarko KA, Richardson LC, Raskob GE. The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: a review of estimated attributable healthcare costs. Thromb Res 2016; 137: 3-10
  • 25 Streiff M, Milentijevic D, McCrae KR. et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with venous thromboembolism in cancer patients treated with anticoagulants. J Med Econ 2019; 22 (11) 1134-1140
  • 26 Khorana AA, McCrae KR, Milentijevic D. et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with cancer. J Med Econ 2020; 23 (04) 323-329
  • 27 Blom JW, Vanderschoot JP, Oostindiër MJ, Osanto S, van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR. Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 (03) 529-535
  • 28 Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane; 2020
  • 29 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
  • 30 Hutton B, Catalá-López F, Moher D. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA [in Spanish]. Med Clín (Barc) 2016; 147 (06) 262-266
  • 31 Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton A, Ades AE. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 3: Heterogeneity: Subgroups, Meta-Regression, Bias and Bias-Adjustment. Accessed October 26, 2022 at: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/nice-dsu/tsds/evidence-synthesis
  • 32 Dias S, Welton N, Sutton A, Ades AE. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. August 20, 2012, Accessed October 26, 2022 at: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/nice-dsu/tsds/evidence-synthesis
  • 33 Brooks SP, Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 1998; 7 (04) 434-455
  • 34 Gelman A. Inference and monitoring convergence. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. eds. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall; 1996: 131-143
  • 35 Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 58
  • 36 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560
  • 37 Arshad N, Bjøri E, Hindberg K, Isaksen T, Hansen JB, Braekkan SK. Recurrence and mortality after first venous thromboembolism in a large population-based cohort. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (02) 295-303
  • 38 Howlett J, Benzenine E, Cottenet J, Foucher P, Fagnoni P, Quantin C. Could venous thromboembolism and major bleeding be indicators of lung cancer mortality? A nationwide database study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20 (01) 461
  • 39 Chou SC, Pai CH, Lin SW, Tien HF. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in a cohort of Taiwanese patients with lung, gastric, pancreatic cancers or lymphoma. J Formos Med Assoc 2022; 121 (1, Pt 2): 360-366
  • 40 Hall IE, Andersen MS, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Predictors of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced common solid cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol 2009; 2009: 182521
  • 41 Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH. Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer 2007; 110 (10) 2339-2346
  • 42 Mahajan A, Brunson A, Adesina O, Keegan THM, Wun T. The incidence of cancer-associated thrombosis is increasing over time. Blood Adv 2022; 6 (01) 307-320
  • 43 Ohashi Y, Ikeda M, Kunitoh H. et al. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: report of baseline data from the multicentre, prospective Cancer-VTE Registry. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50 (11) 1246-1253
  • 44 Stein PD, Beemath A, Meyers FA, Skaf E, Sanchez J, Olson RE. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with cancer. Am J Med 2006; 119 (01) 60-68
  • 45 van Es N, Ventresca M, Di Nisio M. et al; IPDMA Heparin Use in Cancer Patients Research Group. The Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (08) 1940-1951
  • 46 Fernandes CJ, Morinaga LTK, Alves Jr JL. et al. Cancer-associated thrombosis: the when, how and why. Eur Respir Rev 2019; 28 (151) 180119
  • 47 Lyman GH, Carrier M, Ay C. et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer. Blood Adv 2021; 5 (04) 927-974
  • 48 Athale U, Siciliano S, Thabane L. et al. Epidemiology and clinical risk factors predisposing to thromboembolism in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 51 (06) 792-797
  • 49 Howie C, Erker C, Crooks B, Moorehead P, Kulkarni K. Incidence and risk factors of venous thrombotic events in pediatric patients with CNS tumors compared with non-CNS cancer: a population-based cohort study. Thromb Res 2021; 200: 51-55
  • 50 Lipay NV, Zmitrovich AI, Aleinikova OV. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in children with malignant diseases: a single-center study of the Belarusian Center for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology. Thromb Res 2011; 128 (02) 130-134
  • 51 Pabinger I, van Es N, Heinze G. et al. A clinical prediction model for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a development and validation study in two independent prospective cohorts. Lancet Haematol 2018; 5 (07) e289-e298
  • 52 Di Nisio M, Candeloro M, Rutjes AWS, Porreca E. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16 (07) 1336-1346
  • 53 Lin L, Chu H, Hodges JS. On evidence cycles in network meta-analysis. Stat Interface 2020; 13 (04) 425-436
  • 54 Camm AJ, Fox KAA. Strengths and weaknesses of ‘real-world’ studies involving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Open Heart 2018; 5 (01) e000788
  • 55 Chodankar D. Introduction to real-world evidence studies. Perspect Clin Res 2021; 12 (03) 171-174
  • 56 Kaptein FHJ, Guman NAM, van Es N. et al. Treatment and prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis in the Netherlands: a national survey. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2023; 7 (01) 100057
  • 57 Mahé I, Scotté F, Rey JB. et al; AFSOS (French-speaking Association for Supportive Care in Oncology), SFMV (French Society for Vascular Medicine). Prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis in France: a national survey among vascular disease and supportive care specialists. J Med Vasc 2017; 42 (05) 255-262
  • 58 Martin KA, Molsberry R, Khan SS, Linder JA, Cameron KA, Benson III A. Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2020; 4 (07) 1211-1215
  • 59 Mumoli N, Barco S, Cei M. et al. Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with solid brain neoplasms: results of a survey among Italian physicians. Intern Emerg Med 2017; 12 (04) 437-443
  • 60 Yeung J, Tjokrowidjaja A, Lewis C, Lynch J. Survey of medical oncologists and trainee practice on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in solid cancers. Intern Med J 2023; 53 (01) 131-135
  • 61 Addo-Tabiri NO, Chudasama R, Vasudeva R. et al. Black patients experience highest rates of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43 (02) 94-100
  • 62 Austin K, George J, Robinson EJ, Scully M, Thomas MR. Retrospective cohort study of venous thromboembolism rates in ambulatory cancer patients: association with Khorana score and other risk factors. J Hematol (Brossard) 2019; 8 (01) 17-25
  • 63 Blix K, Gran OV, Severinsen MT. et al. Impact of time since diagnosis and mortality rate on cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: the Scandinavian Thrombosis and Cancer (STAC) cohort. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16 (07) 1327-1335
  • 64 Cronin-Fenton DP, Søndergaard F, Pedersen LA. et al. Hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and the general population: a population-based cohort study in Denmark, 1997-2006. Br J Cancer 2010; 103 (07) 947-953
  • 65 Gade IL, Brækkan S, Næss IA. et al. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in hematological cancers: the Scandinavian Thrombosis and Cancer (STAC) cohort. Thromb Res 2017; 158: 157-160
  • 66 Nose T, Imamura Y, Ohata S. et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with solid cancers in Japan: retrospective study of 2735 patients. Int J Hematol 2021; 114 (03) 319-324
  • 67 Spyropoulos AC, Eldredge JB, Anand LN. et al. External validation of a venous thromboembolic risk score for cancer outpatients with solid tumors: the COMPASS-CAT Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model. Oncologist 2020; 25 (07) e1083-e1090
  • 68 Gade IL, Braekkan SK, Naess IA. et al. The impact of initial cancer stage on the incidence of venous thromboembolism: the Scandinavian Thrombosis and Cancer (STAC) Cohort. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (08) 1567-1575
  • 69 Ratib S, Walker AJ, Card TR, Grainge MJ. Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalised cancer patients in England-a cohort study. J Hematol Oncol 2016; 9 (01) 60
  • 70 Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Lyman GH. Risk factors for chemotherapy-associated venous thromboembolism in a prospective observational study. Cancer 2005; 104 (12) 2822-2829
  • 71 Khorana AA, Dalal M, Lin J, Connolly GC. Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among ambulatory high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in the United States. Cancer 2013; 119 (03) 648-655
  • 72 Lyman GH, Eckert L, Wang Y, Wang H, Cohen A. Venous thromboembolism risk in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a real-world analysis. Oncologist 2013; 18 (12) 1321-1329
  • 73 Mandalà M, Barni S, Prins M. et al. Acquired and inherited risk factors for developing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective trial. Ann Oncol 2010; 21 (04) 871-876
  • 74 Adiamah A, Ban L, West J, Humes DJ. The risk of venous thromboembolism after surgery for esophagogastric malignancy and the impact of chemotherapy: a population-based cohort study. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33 (06) doz079
  • 75 Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L. et al. A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: the @RISTOS project. Ann Surg 2006; 243 (01) 89-95
  • 76 Alsubaie H, Leggett C, Lambert P. et al. Diagnosis of VTE postdischarge for major abdominal and pelvic oncologic surgery: implications for a change in practice. Can J Surg 2015; 58 (05) 305-311
  • 77 Hammond J, Kozma C, Hart JC. et al. Rates of venous thromboembolism among patients with major surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (12) 3240-3247
  • 78 Krimphove MJ, Reese S, Chen X. et al. Minimally invasive cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of venous thromboembolic events. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121 (03) 578-583
  • 79 Mallick S, Aiken T, Varley P. et al. Readmissions from venous thromboembolism after complex cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 2022; 157 (04) 312-320
  • 80 Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD. et al. Post-discharge venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: extending the case for extended prophylaxis. Ann Surg 2011; 254 (01) 131-137
  • 81 Peedicayil A, Weaver A, Li X, Carey E, Cliby W, Mariani A. Incidence and timing of venous thromboembolism after surgery for gynecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 121 (01) 64-69
  • 82 Ruff SM, Weber KT, Khader A. et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer undergoing surgical exploration. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 47 (02) 316-323
  • 83 Wright JD, Chen L, Jorge S. et al. Prescription of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis after high-risk, abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141 (03) 531-537
  • 84 Dunbar A, Bolton KL, Devlin SM. et al. Genomic profiling identifies somatic mutations predicting thromboembolic risk in patients with solid tumors. Blood 2021; 137 (15) 2103-2113
  • 85 Shah MA, Capanu M, Soff G, Asmis T, Kelsen DP. Risk factors for developing a new venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with non-hematologic malignancies and impact on survival for gastroesophageal malignancies. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (08) 1702-1709