Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775809
Hearing Performance in Cochlear Implant Users Who Have Facial Nerve Stimulation[*]
Funding The authors received no financial support for the present research.
Abstract
Introduction Facial nerve stimulation (FNS) is a complication in cochlear implant (CI) when the electrical current escapes from the cochlea to the nearby facial nerve. Different management to reduce its effects are available, although changes might result in a less-than-ideal fitting for the CI user, eventually reducing speech perception.
Objective To verify the etiologies that cause FNS, to identify strategies in managing FNS, and to evaluate speech recognition in patients who present FNS.
Methods Retrospective study approved by the Ethical Board of the Institution. From the files of a CI group, patients who were identified with FNS either during surgery or at any time postoperatively were selected. Data collection included: CI manufacturer, electrode array type, age at implantation, etiology of hearing loss, FNS identification date, number of electrodes that generated FNS, FNS management actions, and speech recognition in quiet and in noise.
Results Data were collected from 7 children and 25 adults. Etiologies that cause FNS were cochlear malformation, head trauma, meningitis, and otosclerosis; the main actions included decrease in the stimulation levels followed by the deactivation of electrodes. Average speech recognition in quiet before FNS was 86% and 80% after in patients who were able to accomplish the test. However, there was great variability, ranging from 0% in quiet to 90% of speech recognition in noise.
Conclusion Etiologies that cause FNS are related to cochlear morphology alterations. Facial nerve stimulation can be solved using speech processor programming parameters; however, it is not possible to predict outcomes, since results depend on other variables.
* The present work was presented at the 21st Congress of the Otorhinolaryngology Foundation in Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 03 May 2023
Accepted: 13 August 2023
Article published online:
14 November 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Brammeier TG, Prenger EC. Facial nerve stimulation after Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1997; 18 (03) 336-341
- 2 Berrettini S, Vito A, Bruschini L, Passetti S, Forli F. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation: our experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2011; 31 (01) 11-16
- 3 Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1787-1791
- 4 Ahn JH, Oh SH, Chung JW, Lee KS. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation according to types of Nucleus 24-channel electrode arrays. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129 (06) 588-591
- 5 Espahbodi M, Sweeney AD, Lennon KJ, Wanna GB. Facial nerve stimulation associated with cochlear implant use following temporal bone fractures. Am J Otolaryngol 2015; 36 (04) 578-582
- 6 Bahmer A, Baumann U. The underlying mechanism of preventing facial nerve stimulation by triphasic pulse stimulation in cochlear implant users assessed with objective measure. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (09) 1231-1237
- 7 Bahmer A, Adel Y, Baumann U. Preventing facial nerve stimulation by triphasic pulse stimulation in cochlear implant users: intraoperative recordings. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38 (10) e438-e444
- 8 Smullen JL, Polak M, Hodges AV. et al. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (06) 977-982
- 9 Flook EP, Broomfield SJ, Saeed S, Bruce IA, Green KM. Cochlear Implantation in far Advanced Otosclerosis: A Surgical, Audiological and Quality of Life Review of 35 Cases in a Single Unit. Int. Adv. Otol. 2011; 7 (01) 35-40
- 10 Frijns JH, Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (08) 1168-1174
- 11 Battmer R, Pesch J, Stöver T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz M, Lenarz T. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (07) 918-922
- 12 Polak M, Ulubil SA, Hodges AV, Balkany TJ. Revision cochlear implantation for facial nerve stimulation in otosclerosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 132 (04) 398-404
- 13 Kiyohara S, Sakurai T, Kashima I. Early detection of radiation-induced structural changes in rat trabecular bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32 (01) 30-38
- 14 Pires JS, Melo AS, Caiado R, Martins JH, Elói Moura J, Silva LF. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation: Our experience in 448 adult patients. Cochlear Implants Int 2018; 19 (04) 193-197
- 15 Eshraghi AA, Ila K, Ocak E, Telischi FF. Advanced Otosclerosis: Stapes Surgery or Cochlear Implantation?. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (02) 429-440 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.11.012.
- 16 Braun K, Walker K, Sürth W, Löwenheim H, Tropitzsch A. Triphasic pulses in cochlear implant patients with facial nerve stimulation. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40 (10) 1268-1277
- 17 Konerding WS, Baumhoff P, Kral A. Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2023; 24 (01) 31-46 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8.
- 18 Alzhrani F, Halawani R, Basodan S, Hudeib R. Investigating Facial Nerve Stimulation After Cochlear Implantation in Adult and Pediatric Recipients. Laryngoscope 2021; 131 (02) 374-379 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28632.