A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Residual Inhibition Technique in Hearing Aids for Suppression of Tinnitus

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Tinnitus acoustic therapy is defined as any use of sound where the intent is to alter the tinnitus perception and/or the reactions to tinnitus in a clinically beneficial way. The parameters of sound that may cause beneficial effects, however, are currently only theorized with limited data supporting their effectiveness. Residual inhibition is the temporary suppression or elimination of tinnitus that is usually observed following appropriate auditory stimulation. Our pilot study investigated the effects of a therapeutic acoustic stimulus that was individually customized to maximize residual inhibition of tinnitus and extend its duration to determine if there could be a sustained suppression of the tinnitus signal (i.e., reduced tinnitus loudness) and a reduction in the psychological and emotional reactions to tinnitus. This pilot study had two objectives: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of residual inhibition technique therapy through daily use of hearing aids and (2) to determine its effects by measuring reactionary changes in tinnitus with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and perceptual changes in tinnitus loudness. A total of 20 adults (14 males, 6 females; mean age: 58 years, SD = 12.88) with chronic tinnitus were enrolled in a four-visit study that consisted of the following: (1) baseline visit and initiation of the intervention period, (2) a 1-month postintervention visit, (3) 2-month postintervention visit and initiation of a wash-out period, and (4) a 3-month visit to assess the wash-out period and any lasting effects of the intervention. The intervention consisted of fitting bilateral hearing aids and creating an individualized residual inhibition stimulus that was streamed via Bluetooth from a smartphone application to the hearing aids. The participants were instructed to wear the hearing aids and stream the residual inhibition stimulus all waking hours for the 2-month intervention period. During the wash-out period, the participants were instructed to use the hearing aids for amplification, but the residual inhibition stimulus was discontinued. At all visits, the participants completed the TFI, study-specific self-report measures to document perceptions of tinnitus, a psychoacoustic test battery consisting of tinnitus loudness and pitch matching, and a residual inhibition test battery consisting of minimum masking and minimum residual inhibition levels. At the end of the trial, participants were interviewed about the study experience and acceptability of the residual inhibition treatment technique. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted on the two main outcomes (TFI total score and tinnitus loudness) across all four visits. The results showed a significant main effect of visit on the TFI total score (p < 0.0001). Specifically, the results indicated a significant reduction in TFI total scores from baseline to the 1-month post-intervention period, which remained stable across the 2-month post-intervention period and the wash-out period. The ANOVA results did not show a significant change in tinnitus loudness as a function of visit (p = 0.480). The majority of the participants reported a positive experience with the study intervention at their exit interview. This pilot study demonstrated that residual inhibition as a sound therapy for tinnitus, specifically through the daily use of hearing aids, was feasible and acceptable to individuals suffering from chronic tinnitus. In addition, participants showed improvement in reactions to tinnitus as demonstrated by sustained reduction in TFI scores on average over the course of the treatment period. Achieving residual inhibition may also provide patients a feeling of control over their tinnitus, and this may have a synergistic effect in reducing the psychological and emotional distress associated with tinnitus. There was no significant reduction in long-term tinnitus loudness resulting from the residual inhibition treatment; however, the current pilot study may not have had sufficient power to detect such a change. The combination of tinnitus suppression and improved psychosocial/emotional reactions to tinnitus may result in a better quality of life in both the short and long term. A larger-scale study is needed to determine the validity of using residual inhibition as a clinical therapy option and to ascertain any effects on both perception and reactions to tinnitus.

Publication History

Article published online:
28 June 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• Auerbach BD, Rodrigues PV, Salvi RJ. Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis. Front Neurol 2014; 5: 206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 96-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie RA. Overview: suffering from tinnitus. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. J.B. Snow. Lewiston, NY: BC Decker Inc.; 2004: 1-7
  Google Scholar
• Eggermont JJ. Acquired hearing loss and brain plasticity. Hear Res 2017; 343: 176-190
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evered D, Lawrenson G. eds. Tinnitus. Ciba Foundation Symposium 85. London: Pitman Books, Ltd; 1981
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Feldmann H. Homolateral and contralateral masking of tinnitus by noise-bands and by pure tones. Audiology 1971; 10 (03) 138-144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fournier P, Cuvillier AF, Gallego S. et al. A new method for assessing masking and residual inhibition of tinnitus. Trends Hear 2018; 22: 2331216518769996
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller TE, Haider HF, Kikidis D. et al. Different teams, same conclusions? A systematic review of existing clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of tinnitus in adults. Front Psychol 2017; 8 (206) 206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galazyuk AV, Voytenko SV, Longenecker RJ. Long-lasting forward suppression of spontaneous firing in auditory neurons: implication to the residual inhibition of tinnitus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2017; 18 (02) 343-353
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Flick CL, Gilbert A, Ellingson RM, Fausti SA. Comparison of manual and computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch-matching. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41 (02) 121-138
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Griest S, Austin D. et al. Tinnitus Screener: results from the first 100 participants in an epidemiology study. Am J Audiol 2016; a 25 (02) 153-160
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Griest S, Thielman E, McMillan G, Kaelin C, Carlson KF. Tinnitus Functional Index: development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res 2016; b 334: 58-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Griest S, Zaugg TL. et al. Tinnitus and hearing survey: a screening tool to differentiate bothersome tinnitus from hearing difficulties. Am J Audiol 2015; 24 (01) 66-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Meikle MB. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 11 (03) 138-155
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Quinn CM. Sound therapy for tinnitus: options for audiologists. Perspectives Sig 8 Audiology. Public Health 2020; 5 (03) 669-683
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hillecke T, Nickel A, Bolay HV. Scientific perspectives on music therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005; 1060 (01) 271-282
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990; 8 (04) 221-254
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keidser G, Dillon H, Flax M, Ching T, Brewer S. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Res 2011; 1 (01) e24
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE. et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (02) 153-176
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neff PKA, Schoisswohl S, Simoes J. et al. Prolonged tinnitus suppression after short-term acoustic stimulation. Prog Brain Res 2021; 262: 159-174
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okamoto H, Stracke H, Stoll W, Pantev C. Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107 (03) 1207-1210
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reavis KM, Rothholtz VS, Tang Q, Carroll JA, Djalilian H, Zeng FG. Temporary suppression of tinnitus by modulated sounds. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2012; 13 (04) 561-571
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts LE, Moffat G, Bosnyak DJ. Residual inhibition functions in relation to tinnitus spectra and auditory threshold shift. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2006; S556 (556) 27-33
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts LE, Moffat G, Baumann M, Ward LM, Bosnyak DJ. Residual inhibition functions overlap tinnitus spectra and the region of auditory threshold shift. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2008; 9 (04) 417-435
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stracke H, Okamoto H, Pantev C. Customized notched music training reduces tinnitus loudness. Commun Integr Biol 2010; 3 (03) 274-277
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teismann H, Okamoto H, Pantev C. Short and intense tailor-made notched music training against tinnitus: the tinnitus frequency matters. PLoS One 2011; 6 (09) e24685
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terry AM, Jones DM, Davis BR, Slater R. Parametric studies of tinnitus masking and residual inhibition. Br J Audiol 1983; 17 (04) 245-256
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH. et al. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151 (2, Suppl): S1-S40
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vernon JA, Meikle MB. Tinnitus masking. In: Tyler R. ed. Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000: 313-356
  Google Scholar
• Vernon JA, Meikle MB. Tinnitus: clinical measurement. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2003; 36 (02) 293-305 , vi
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material