Kommentar zur TIDieR Checkliste

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der Kommentar erläutert mit kurzen Beispielen die Notwendigkeit und Möglichkeiten der TIDieR-Leitlinie zur Forschungsberichterstattung.

Abstract

This comment focuses on the need for and possible impact of the TIDieR reporting guideline.

• Literatur

• 1 Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014; 383: 166-175
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ2014; 348: g1687. Appendix 1: Existing checklists and literature used in generation of the Delphi survey items http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g1687?tab=related#webextra
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Hoffmann TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ 2013; 347: f3755
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Chan S, Bhandari M. The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomised trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1970-1978
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Pibouleau L, Boutron I, Reeves BC et al. Applicability and generalizability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review. BMJ 2009; 339: b4538
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Jacquier I, Boutron I, Moher D et al. The reporting of randomised clinical trias using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 677-683
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Duff JM, Leather H, Walden EO et al. Adequacy of published oncology randomised controlled trials to provide therapeutic details needed for clinical application. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 702-705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Conn VS, Cooper PS, Ruppar TM et al. Searching for the intervention in intervention research reports. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008; 40: 52-59
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Dijkers M, Kropp GC, Esper RM et al. Quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 21-33
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Li J-Y, Zhang Y-F, Smith GS et al. Quality of reporting of randomised clinical trials in tai chi interventions-a systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011: 383245
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Robb SL, Carpenter JS. A review of music-based intervention reporting in pediatrics. J Health Psychol 2009; 14: 490-501
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Schroter S, Glasziou P, Heneghan C. Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e001978
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG et al. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomised trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 295-310
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Conn VS. Unpacking the black box: countering the problem of inadequate intervention descriptions in research reports. West J Nurs Res 2012; 34: 427-433
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: MR000030
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Chung KC, Burns PB. A guide to planning and executing a surgical randomised controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 407-412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Proudfoot J, Klein B, Barak A et al. Establishing guidelines for executing and reporting internet intervention. Cogn Behav Ther 2011; 40: 82-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Wade DT, Smeets RJ, Verbunt J. Research in rehabilitation medicine: methodological challenges. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 699-704
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 APA. Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be?. Am Psychol 2008; 63: 839-851
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Marks DF. How should psychology interventions be reported?. J Health Psychol 2009; 14: 475-489
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ramsay P, Salisbury LG, Merriweather JL et al. RECOVER trial collaboration. A rehabilitation intervention to promote physical recovery following intensive care: a detailed description of construct development, rationale and content together with proposed taxonomy to capture processes in a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013; 46: 81-95
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Lamb SE, Becker C, Gillespie LD et al. Reporting of complex interventions in clinical trials: development of a taxonomy to classify and describe fall-prevention interventions. Trials 2011; 12: 125-132
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar