Foreign Body Reaction Mimicking Lymph Node Metastasis is Not Rare After Lung Cancer Resection

 

 Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background Mediastinal lymphadenopathies with high 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients previously operated on for lung cancer are alarming for recurrence and necessitate invasive diagnostic procedures. Peroperative placement of oxidized cellulose to control minor bleeding may lead to a metastasis-like image through a foreign body reaction within the dissected mediastinal lymph node field at postoperative examinations. In this study, we investigated clinicopathological features and the frequency of foreign body reaction mimicking mediastinal lymph node metastasis.

Methods Patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer between January 2016 and August 2021 and who were subsequently evaluated for mediastinal recurrence with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) were included. Patients were grouped according to the results of EBUS-TBNA as metastasis, foreign body, and reactive. Clinicopathological features of these patients were compared and characteristics of patients in the foreign body group were scrutinized.

Results EBUS-TBNA was performed on a total of 34 patients during their postoperative follow-up due to suspicion of mediastinal recurrence. EBUS-TBNA pathological workup revealed metastasis in 18 (52.9%), foreign body reaction in 10 (29.4%) and reactive lymph nodes in 6 (17.6%) patients. Mean maximum standardized uptake value (SUVMax) for metastasis group and foreign body group were 9.39 ± 4.69 and 5.48 ± 2.54, respectively (p = 0.022). Time interval between the operation and EBUS-TBNA for the metastasis group was 23.72 ± 10.48 months, while it was 14.90 ± 12.51 months in the foreign body group (p = 0.015).

Conclusion Foreign body reaction mimicking mediastinal lymph node metastasis is not uncommon. Iatrogenic cause of mediastinal lymphadenopathy is related to earlier presentation and lower SUVMax compared with metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Publication History

Received: 26 April 2023

Accepted: 25 August 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 August 2023

Article published online:
25 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Roshkovan L, Singhal S, Katz SI, Galperin-Aizenberg M. Multimodality imaging of Surgicel^®, an important mimic of post-operative complication in the thorax. BJR Open 2021; 3 (01) 20210031
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Zuccatosta L, Latini MA, Mei F. et al. A lymph node mediastinal foreign body reaction mimicking nodal metastasis: a case series. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 1014617
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Keshavarzi S, MacDougall M, Lulic D, Kasasbeh A, Levy M. Clinical experience with the Surgicel family of absorbable hemostats (oxidized regenerated cellulose) in neurosurgical applications: a review. Wounds 2013; 25 (06) 160-167
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Badenes D, Pijuan L, Curull V, Sánchez-Font A. A foreign body reaction to Surgicel^® in a lymph node diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Thorac Med 2017; 12 (01) 55-56
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL. et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19 (03) 254-266
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Castillo-Gázquez L, Pacios E, Largo P, Báscones I, Jimenez-Heffernan JA. Pseudotumoral reaction against oxidized cellulose (Surgicel®) in a post-COVID19 tracheostomy scar. Res Sq 2022; DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2315964/v1.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Kurian EM, Abu-Hijleh M, Lowrey TR, De Las Casas LE. Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose (Surgicel®) on Cytology/Histology. Acta Cytol 2022; 66 (06) 556-559
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Wang H, Chen P. Surgicel^® (oxidized regenerated cellulose) granuloma mimicking local recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report. Oncol Lett 2013; 5 (05) 1497-1500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Eto K, Matsumoto M, Kubo Y, Kemmochi R. Superior vena cava syndrome caused by a swollen absorbable haemostat after repair of ischaemic mitral regurgitation. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Rustagi T, Patel K, Kadrekar S, Jain A. Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) causing postoperative cauda equine syndrome. Cureus 2017; 9 (07) e1500
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Martínez A, Pubul V, Jokh EA, Martínez A, El-Diasty M, Fernández AL. Surgicel-related uptake on positron emission tomography scan mimicking prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112 (05) e317-e319
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ethicon. Surgicel® Original Absorbable Hemostats. Accessed January 2, 2021 at: https://www.jnjmedtech.com/en-US/product/surgicel-original-absorbable-hemostat
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Haidari TA, Petersen RH, Skov BG, Ravn J. Oxidized resorbable cellulose (Gelita-cel) causing foreign body reaction in the mediastinum. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018; 27 (06) 881-883 (Erratum in: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019 Sep 1;29(3):495. PMID: 29878119.)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Chou HP, Lin KH, Huang HK. et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (10) 8021-8029
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Sayan M, Çelik A, Şatır Türk M. et al. Oxidized regenerated cellulose can be a cause of false tumor recurrence on PET/CT in patients with lung cancer treated surgically. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2023; 32 (01) 8-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar