Zum Inhalt

Moderating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency among undergraduate nursing students

  • Open Access
  • 17.12.2025
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Background

As the healthcare environment changes rapidly due to the spread of information and communication technology (ICT), nursing fields require nursing informatics competency to effectively utilize vast amounts of information, along with the ability to understand and utilize ICT. In addition, critical thinking competency, which is the ability to efficiently use nursing information systems and critically analyze and solve complex problems, has been emphasized. Previous studies have reported on nursing informatics competency and critical thinking or critical thinking disposition; however, few have identified moderators or mediators in these relationships. This study evaluated the mediating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency.

Methods

This study involved a secondary analysis of data from 235 questionnaires of undergraduate students from two Korean cities between October and November 2022. A direct questionnaire was used to collect the data. The study variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlations, and a model tested using the Hayes PROCESS macro (Model 1) moderation model.

Results

The mean scores for critical thinking disposition, self-control, and nursing informatics competency were 3.79 ± 0.52, 3.42 ± 0.60, and 3.80 ± 0.50, respectively. Critical thinking disposition and self-control were positively correlated with nursing informatics competency. In the moderation model, self-control had a conditional moderating effect on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency. The positive effect of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency increased as self-control increased.

Conclusions

Critical thinking disposition and self-control may be important determinants of nursing informatics competency among undergraduate nursing students. To effectively increase nursing informatics competency, critical thinking disposition should be enhanced through educational programs or training with content, including increasing self-control.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

The rapid development of information and communication technology (ICT) has become a core element of the modern healthcare system; in particular, electronic health record (EHR) and electronic medical record (EMR) systems contribute to improving the efficiency of nursing work and the quality of care [1, 2]. Accordingly, nurses must be familiar with utilizing various digital devices and managing patient data. For this purpose, nursing informatics competency has become an essential professional abilities [3, 4].
Nursing informatics competency encompasses computer skills competence, informatics skills competence, and informatics knowledge competence—each essential for nursing practice—as well as the ability to integrate and apply them to nursing [58]. Among the three sub-elements of nursing informatics competency, computer skills refer to the ability to use computers for nursing purposes and utilize clinical information systems, including document creation, use of database management programs and tools for communication, online use of information sharing and collaboration for individual and team tasks, and understanding of nursing information systems [8, 9]. The second sub-element, informatics skills competence, refers to the ability to understand the importance of various information structures and levels, systematically classify data, and use methods and tools related to information utilization, such as information search, data collection, and database literature search using the Internet [8, 9]. The last sub-element, informatics knowledge competence, includes the use of statistical analysis programs for nursing research and big data analysis, as well as ethical aspects such as personal information protection, the importance of confidentiality, information security, and information ethics [6, 8]. As ICT is an integral component of the global healthcare system and the use of healthcare systems in clinical practice is a critical part of nursing work, nursing informatics competency has become an essential prerequisite for nurses to perform their professional roles [3, 4]. It has also been reported that when nurses are proficient in using healthcare information systems, they can provide high-quality nursing care with greater efficiency and effectiveness [2]. In the current trend of changes in healthcare and nursing environments, nurses are the primary users of digital health technologies, and nursing informatics competency is becoming increasingly important for nursing students preparing to enter the profession [1, 7, 10]. Nursing informatics competency goes beyond simple technical skills, involving complex information processes such as the collection, analysis storage, and sharing of information. Within this framework, critical thinking is emphasized as a key component [1113]. Critical thinking is the ability to analyze a given situation, draw logical judgments based on evidence, and make the best decision [14]; the mindset or attitude to engage in such critical thinking is called critical thinking disposition [14]. In other words, critical thinking disposition refers to the characteristics or attitude of an individual who values critical thinking and tries to critically analyze and think based on objective evidence for claims or statements [1416]. In the recent healthcare environment characterized by rapid change and an explosion of information, nurses need the ability to think critically in order to flexibly identify the unique circumstances of each patient and make appropriate nursing judgments and decisions to Within this critically judgment process, critical thinking disposition improves the clinical performance of nurses [1719]. In addition, critical thinking disposition is positively correlated with nursing informatics competency [20], and in particular, it has been confirmed as a factor that significantly affects informatics skills competency, a sub-element of nursing informatics competency [21]. Moreover, it has been reported that informatics skills competency has a partial mediating effect in the relationship between critical thinking disposition and evidence-based practice competency [22]. Therefore, critical thinking disposition is an important factor for improving clinical performance and nursing informatics competency in informatized nursing practice [23]. Therefore, researchers must identify and promote the critical thinking disposition of prospective nursing students to improve their critical thinking skills. However, previous studies have primarily examined the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics skills competence, a sub-element of nursing informatics competency, and have not identified a direct significant relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency. Therefore, further research is required to confirm the relationship between overall nursing informatics competency and critical thinking disposition.
Self-control is defined as the effortful inhibition of an immediate impulse, including the effortful overriding of unwanted thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and is composed of the subcomponents of concentration and self-discipline [2427]. Self-control refers to all means of resolving conflicts between competing goals [26]. Some studies have highlighted that self-control plays an important role in the clinical practice of nursing students [28, 29]. In particular, when nursing students use nursing information systems in clinical practice, they can access patients’ personal information, and there is a possibility of ethical problems, such as personal information leaks. In such situations, self-control serves as a basis for restraining unethical behavior and leading behavior in a socially desirable direction [30, 31]. It also works together with critical thinking tendencies to help nursing students concentrate on tasks such as searching, collecting, and analyzing necessary information [32, 33]. Previous studies have also reported that self-control is significantly related to the perception of attitudes toward patient personal information protection and information security compliance, which are sub-elements of nursing informatics competency [34, 35]. In this regard, critical thinking disposition and self-control are anticipated to be important variables in the nursing informatics competency of nursing college students; however, few studies have simultaneously explored the relationship between them. In addition, self-control is expected to act as a moderating variable in the process by which critical thinking disposition affects nursing informatics competency; however, there is no research related to this.
In this context, this secondary data analysis used survey data [36] to explore the relationship among critical thinking disposition, nursing informatics competency, and self-control in Korean nursing students and identify the moderating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency. (Fig. 1) The proposed hypotheses are as follows:
Hypothesis 1
(H1): Critical thinking disposition is positively associated with nursing informatics competency.
Hypothesis 2
(H2): Self-control has a moderating effect on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency.
Fig. 1
Study model
Bild vergrößern

Methods

Study design and participants

This study constitutes a secondary data analysis of survey data. The participants of the survey data used in this secondary study are convenience sample of undergraduate nursing students attending universities located in cities G and P in South Korea. The inclusion criteria for the participants were as follows: undergraduate nursing students who (1) were in 3rd and 4th year of their study and had participated in clinical training and (2) understood the purpose of the study and voluntarily agreed to participate. The sample size for the regression analysis was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.2 program. The minimum number of participants required for this study was 178, based on a statistical power of 0.95, a significance level of 0.05, 11 predictors, and an effect size of 0.15. Considering the possibility of participant dropout, 235 printed questionnaires with consent forms were distributed and returned. A total of 235 valid questionnaires were used in the final analysis, after excluding five questionnaires with missing data.

Survey data collection and procedure

Survey data from the primary study [36], used for this secondary analysis, were collected between October and November 2022. First, permission was obtained to conduct the study from the chief of the nursing department at each university. Thereafter, one of the researchers contacted the undergraduate nursing students directly after class and explained the purpose, procedure, and questionnaire content of the study. The undergraduate students were informed that participation was voluntary and that they could withdraw at any time during the study without any negative consequences. The questionnaires were then distributed along with consent forms. Participants who had difficulty understanding items in the questionnaires could ask the researcher for help in completing them. The completed questionnaires were collected by one of the researchers on the same day and gifts worth 5000 won were given to the participants who responded to and completed the questionnaire.

Measures

Critical thinking disposition

The critical thinking disposition scale developed by Yoon [37]was used to measure critical thinking disposition among undergraduate students. The scale comprises 27 items and 7 categories: intellectual eagerness/curiosity (5 items), prudence (4 items), self-confidence (4 items), systematicity (3 items), intellectual fairness (4 items), healthy skepticism (4 items), and objectivity (3 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 5 = always), with a total score ranging from 27 to 135. Higher scores indicate a higher critical thinking disposition. Two negatively worded items are reverse scored. Cronbach’s alpha in Yoon study [37] was 0.84 and it was 0.92 in this study.

Self-control

Self-control was measured using the Korean version of the self-control scale of undergraduate students developed by Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone [31]. Hong, Kim, Kim, and Kim [24] translated and validated the scale; it comprises 11 items across two components: self-discipline (7 items), concentration (4 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The total score ranges from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating higher self-control. Eight negatively worded items are reverse scored. The Cronbach’s alpha was reported to be 0.89 in Tangney et al. [31]’s study, 0.78 in Hong et al.’s [24] study, and 0.764 in the present study.

Nursing informatics competency

The nursing informatics competency scale, developed by Choi, Kim, and Jeong [6], was used to measure nursing informatics competency among undergraduate students. The scale comprises 25 items and 3 categories: computer skills (12 items), informatics skills (5 items), and informatics knowledge (8 items). Each item is rated on a 4-pointed Likert scale (1 = not at all, 4 = a lot). The total score ranges from 25 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher nursing informatics competency. Cronbach’s alpha in Choi, Kim, and Jeong’s study [6] was 0.90, whereas it was 0.878 in the present study.

Covariates

The covariates measured included age, sex, grade, religion, reason for choosing a nursing major, satisfaction with a nursing major, subjective academic achievement, subjective health status, and degree of friendship.

Ethical considerations

The primary study [36] was approved by the institutional review board of Dongguk university (DGU IRB 20190012).

Data analysis

Datawere analyzed using SPSS (version 25.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and SPSS PROCESS macro v3.4. The skewness and kurtosis for each main variable (critical thinking disposition, self-control, and nursing informatics competency) were checked to determine whether the data were normally distributed (skewness range of all main variables: -0.146 to -0.027; kurtosis range of all main variables: -0.496 to -0.127). The main variables and covariates were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Correlations among the study variables were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The PROCESS macro for SPSS (Model 1) was used to evaluate the moderating effect of self-control (Fig. 1) on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency. In addition, the Johnson-Neyman technique and pick-a-point method were used to plot conditional effects for low (mean-1 × SD), medium, and high (mean + 1 × SD) levels of self- control. The significance of the conditional effect of self-control was identified with p < .05, when the confidence interval did not include zero.

Results

General characteristics

Of the 235 participants, 80.9% (190) were female, and the mean age was 24.41 years (range 20–56). A total of 163 participants were in the 4th year (69.4%), and 172 participants (73.2%) reported having a religion. Half of the participants chose a nursing major due to its high employment rate (50.2%), and the majority (94.4%) reported above-average satisfaction with their choice of major. The number of participants who reported above-average levels of subjective academic achievement and health status were 178 (75.5%) and 189 (80.5%), respectively. Most participants (98.7%) indicated that degree of their friendship was above average (Table 1).
Table 1
General characteristics (N = 235)
Variables
Mean
SD
Range
N
%
Age (years)
24.41
4.60
20–56
  
Sex
     
 Male
   
45
19.1
 Female
   
190
80.9
Year
     
 3rd
   
72
30.6
 4th
   
163
69.4
Religion
     
Yes
   
63
26.8
 No
   
172
73.2
Reason for choosing nursing major
     
 High employment rate
   
118
50.2
 Aptitude
   
65
27.7
 Recommendation of family, teachers, or friends
   
40
17.0
 Grade (grade by high school or scholastic ability test)
   
12
5.1
Satisfaction on nursing major
     
 Very satisfied
   
38
16.2
 Satisfied
   
112
47.7
 Average
   
72
30.6
 Unsatisfied
   
10
4.3
 Very unsatisfied
   
3
1.3
Subjective academy achievement level
     
 Very high
   
10
4.3
 High
   
65
27.7
 Average
   
103
43.8
 Low
   
53
22.6
 Very low
   
4
1.7
Subjective health status
     
 Very healthy
   
26
11.1
 Healthy
   
98
41.7
 Average
   
65
27.7
 Unhealthy
   
41
17.4
 Very unhealthy
   
5
2.1
Friendship
     
 Very satisfied
   
48
20.4
 Satisfied
   
132
56.2
 Average
   
52
22.1
 Unsatisfied
   
3
1.3
 Very unsatisfied
   
0
0

Descriptive statistics and correlations among critical thinking disposition, self-control, and nursing informatics competency

The mean scores for critical thinking disposition and self-control were 3.79 ± 0.52 and 3.42 ± 0.60, respectively (Table 2). The mean nursing informatics competency score was 3.80 ± 0.50. Self-control was positively correlated with critical thinking disposition (r = .48, p < .001). In addition, nursing informatics competency was positively correlated with critical thinking disposition (r = .45, p < .001) and positively correlated with self-control (r = .31, p < .001).
Table 2
Descriptive statistics and correlations among critical thinking disposition, self-control, and nursing informatics competency variables
 
Mean
SD
Range
1
2
3
1. Critical thinking disposition
3.79
0.52
2.37-5.00
1
  
2. Self-control
3.42
0.60
1.91–4.82
0.48***
1
 
3. Nursing informatics competency
3.80
0.50
2.58-5.00
0.45***
0.31***
1
***p < .001

Moderating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency

As shown in Table 3, the direct association between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency was significant (ß = 0.433, p < .001), and H1 was supported. In the moderation analysis, self-control moderated the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency (ß = 0.283, p < .001); H2 was supported. In other words, the higher the self-control, the higher the critical thinking disposition regarding nursing informatics competency.
Table 3
Impact of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency and the moderating effect of self-control
 
Nursing informatics competency
Variable
ß
SE
P
LLCI
ULCI
Constant
4.297
0.339
< 0.001
3.630
4.964
Critical thinking disposition
0.433
0.07
< 0.001
0.305
0.561
Self-control
0.108
0.058
0.063
-0.006
0.221
Critical thinking disposition X Self-control
0.283
0.084
< 0.001
0.117
0.449
F
8.33
 
< 0.001
  
R2
0.311
 
< 0.001
  
△R2
0.035
 
< 0.001
  
Note: Values were controlled for covariates (all general characteristics); Abbreviations: △R2, R2 change due to interaction term; SE, standard error; LLCI, lower-level confidence interval; ULCI, upper-level confidence interval
The moderating effect of self-control results from the Johnson-Neyman method indicated no significant effect for self-control scores ≤ -0.881 (6.81%). The pick-a-point method (Table 4) indicated that the positive association between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency was significant at relatively low (ß = 0.283, p < .001), moderate (ß = 0.283, p < .001), and high levels (ß = 0.283, p < .001) of self-control. Therefore, the positive effect of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency increased as self-control increased. The slope in Fig. 2 reflects a significant conditional effect of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency when self-control was above − 0.881.
Table 4
Conditional effect of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency at different levels of self-control
Value of self-control
Effect
SE
t
P
LLCI
ULCI
(Mean-1 × SD)
0.264
0.078
3.383
< 0.001
0.110
0.418
(Mean)
0.433
0.065
6.669
< 0.001
0.305
0.561
(Mean + 1 × SD)
0.603
0.083
6.992
< 0.001
0.433
0.773
Abbreviations: SE, standard error; LLCI, lower-level confidence interval; ULCI, upper-level confidence interval
Fig. 2
The conditional effect of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency at the values of self-control
Bild vergrößern

Discussion

This study investigated the association between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency and the moderating effect of self-control.
The findings of this study show that critical thinking disposition is positively associated with nursing informatics competency and that self-control has a moderating effect on this relationship. This study makes an important contribution to the literature as it is the first to evaluate the association between critical thinking disposition, self-control, and nursing informatics competency and the moderating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency in nursing students in Korea.

Nursing informatics competency

The average nursing informatics competency score was 3.80 out of 5, which was similar to the scores ranging from 3.65 to 3.74 reported in previous studies [38, 39] conducted on Korean nursing students using the same tool. In a previous study [40] using a different tool (5-point Likert scale) targeting graduate students (nurses) in the United States, the average score was 3.70. In another study [41] targeting undergraduate and graduate students (nurses) in the United States, undergraduate students scored 3.01 and graduate students (nurses) scored 3.23 points. In a separate study [42] conducted on nursing undergraduate students and clinical nurses at the Department of Nursing, Medical University of Iran, undergraduate students scored 3.46 points and clinical nurses scored 3.54 points. These findings indicate that the nursing informatics competency of Korean nursing students is relatively high. In Korea, following the introduction of the Electronic Nursing Record (ENR) system in 2003, the adoption rate reached approximately 70% by 2012, indicating that computerized systems have been rapidly established in nursing settings [41]. In contrast, in the United States, the adoption rate of EHR in hospitals was 9.4% in 2008 [43]; after the implementation of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act in 2009, it reached 27.6% in 2011 and 44.4% in 2012 [44]. Iran introduced the Integrated Electronic Health System (known as SIB, a Persian backronym meaning “apple”) in medical schools and primary care facilities in 2015 [45] . South Korea began the full-scale operation of the ENR system in 2003, establishing an early foundation for integrating information into nursing education and clinical practice. In contrast, the United States began building an EMR-based system in the late 2000s and Iran in the 2010s. This indicates that South Korean nursing students had access to a practical information utilization environment relatively early, which likely contributed to the high scores on the nursing informatics competency evaluations.
In addition, information literacy scores are influenced by differences in the availability of information devices and information technology education [39]. The survey period for this study was 2022, and according to the 2022 Survey on Internet Usage Statistical Table conducted by the National Information Society Agency, 100% of those aged 20 or younger owned ICT devices such as smartphones and tablet PCs, and 77.3% owned laptops, indicating a high level of information search and utilization capabilities through information technology devices. Moreover, nursing students’ nursing information literacy is reported to be influenced by experiences gained through the curriculum [46]. However, despite not completing any nursing information science-related courses, the participants in this study demonstrated higher nursing information literacy than nursing students in the United States [41] and Iran [42]. This suggests that the widespread use of information technology devices for information search, utilization, document creation, and information tool use—rather than that for nursing information science education itself—is a key factor influencing nursing information literacy. These results align with those of a previous study [40] that reported nursing information literacy scores of 3.70 for nurses who had not received undergraduate education in nursing informatics but had at least two years of experience using EHRs. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate nursing informatics courses into the nursing bachelor’s degree program and develop and sustainably operate curricula and extracurricular programs that utilize various ICT devices to ensure their repeated use.

The relationship among critical thinking disposition, self-control, and nursing informatics competency

In this study, nursing students with high critical thinking disposition showed increased nursing informatics competency. The results are consistent with those of previous studies. Previous research has shown that nurses with a high critical thinking disposition have significantly higher nursing informatics competency [11, 20, 47, 48]. In addition, the critical thinking disposition of nursing students is a significant predictor of nursing informatics skills competence, which is a sub-area of nursing informatics competency [21, 22]. A study by [49] targeting Iranian medical students reported that critical thinking disposition showed a significant positive correlation with informatics skills competence. These results indicate that critical thinking disposition is an important factor contributing to the improvement of nursing informatics competency.
Few studies have directly examined the relationship between critical thinking tendencies and self-control, making direct comparison with this study difficult. However, self-regulation, a higher-order concept that includes self-control, has been found to be positively correlated with critical thinking tendencies [39]. In addition, previous studies on psychological control [50] analyzed the effect of parental psychological control on critical thinking among Chinese middle school students and found that self-control acted as a mediating factor, significantly influencing critical thinking. This suggests that self-control may serve as an important mediating factor in the formation of critical thinking tendencies and highlights the need to validate this relationship across various environments and groups. However, studies that directly or indirectly clarify the relationship between self-control and nursing informatics competency or treat these as mediating or moderating variables are currently insufficient. Therefore, research that comprehensively verifies the interconnections among these variables is required.

Moderating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency

The results showed that self-control exerted a positive moderating effect on the process through which critical thinking disposition influenced nursing informatics competency. In addition, it was found that the higher the level of self-control, the stronger the influence of critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency. This suggests that self-control is an important factor related to critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency among nursing students. This can be explained in several ways. Critical thinking is a complex cognitive process that involves analyzing arguments, predicting potential outcomes, identifying alternative solutions appropriate to the situation, and ultimately making decisions [51, 52]. In this process, self-control acts as a means of controlling unnecessary thoughts or emotions and resolving conflicts between competing goals [26]. Moreover, concentration, a subcomponent of self-control, helps nurses focus on given tasks and avoid missing important information, while self-restraint enables them to remain calm and solve problems even in stressful situations [33, 53]. In other words, as nursing students’ self-control increases, their nursing informatics competency improves through the process of accurately collecting and analyzing the information necessary to solve clinical problems or ethical issues that arise in various situations, including clinical practice and performing tasks, while using information utilization tools along with document creation when necessary and solving problems. In this study, critical thinking disposition was significantly related to the nursing informatics competency of nursing students with low, medium, and high levels of self-control. Moreover, the association between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency was stronger among participants with high levels of self-control. In other words, the higher the self-control, the higher the tendency to think critically, leading to improved nursing informatics competency. Therefore, it is necessary to increase self-control to improve nursing informatics competency of nursing students. These abilities play a key role in accurately collecting and analyzing the information required in clinical situations [23, 54], as well as enabling active participation in document writing and collaborative decision-making for problem solving, acting as essential factors in complex medical environments [23, 55]. Therefore, an educational approach that enhances self-control is necessary to strengthen nursing students’ nursing informatics competencies. This will serve as an important foundation for effectively improving the information collection, analysis, and problem-solving competencies required in clinical settings based on critical thinking abilities.

Limitations

The limitations of this study are as follows:
First, this study was conducted as a descriptive survey of nursing students in specific regions, which limits the generalizability of the results. Therefore, future studies should include nursing students from a wider range of regions and nurses from diverse backgrounds to increase the generalizability of the results.
Second, because data were collected through self-report surveys, there is a possibility of social desirability bias or recall bias. Therefore, future studies should use multiple data collection methods or incorporate objective evaluation indicators to minimize measurement bias.
Third, while this study analyzed the moderating effects of critical thinking tendencies, self-regulation, and nursing informatics competency, it did not sufficiently explore other potential mediating and moderating factors, such as internet ethics. Future studies should develop and validate a comprehensive theoretical model that integrates various personal and environmental factors to elucidate the determinants of nursing informatics competency.
Fourth, this study was conducted among nursing students in Korea, which limits the ability to make international comparisons. Future research should include nursing students from diverse countries and cultural contexts in cross-cultural comparative studies to explore universal and culture-specific factors influencing nursing informatics competency and provide evidence for the development of global curricula.

Strengths

In the absence of previous studies examining the relationship between critical thinking tendencies and nursing informatics competency among nursing students, as well as the moderating effect of self-control, this study demonstrates a positive correlation between self-control and critical thinking tendencies. In addition, it reveals that self-control moderates the relationship between critical thinking tendencies and nursing informatics competency, thereby contributing to the academic field. The findings of this study can serve as foundational data for educational programs aimed at enhancing nursing information literacy among nursing students and provide valuable evidence for the development of future programs focused on strengthening nursing information literacy.

Conclusion

In the current healthcare environment that is increasingly becoming informatized, nursing informatics competency is an essential prerequisite for performing the professional role of nurses in various aspects, such as the efficient use of electronic nursing records, data collection and analysis for problem solving, informatics tools utilization ability, and personal information protection. Therefore, for nurses to adapt flexibly to the rapidly changing clinical informatics environment, their nursing informatics competency should be enhanced starting from their student years. In this study, nursing informatics competency was positively associated with critical thinking disposition, and self-control moderated the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency. Therefore, to improve nursing students’ nursing informatics competency, an education strategy that can promote both critical thinking disposition and self-control is needed, and the development of various teaching methods and educational programs is required to improve nursing informatics competency.

Acknowledgements

This study is a re-analysis of data from the first author’s master’s thesis.

Declarations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dongguk University, to which the authors belong (DGU IRB 20190012). This study was conducted on human participants in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Moderating effect of self-control on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency among undergraduate nursing students
Verfasst von
So-Yeon Kim
Yeo-Won Jeong
Publikationsdatum
17.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2026
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04214-2
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Warshawski S, Itzhaki M, Barnoy S. Nurse and nurse student attitudes and perceived self-efficacy in use of information and communication technologies: professional and cultural differences. Comput Inf Nurs. 2019;37:20–8.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American Nurses Association (ANA). What is nursing informatics and why is it so important. 2023.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Khezri H, Abdekhoda M. Assessing nurses’ informatics competency and identifying its related factors. J Res Nurs. 2019;24:529–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinnunen U-M, Heponiemi T, Rajalahti E, Ahonen O, Korhonen T, Hyppönen H. Factors related to health informatics competencies for nurses—results of a National electronic health record survey. Comput Inf Nurs. 2019;37:420–9.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter KM, McGonigle DM, Hebda TL. TIGER-based measurement of nursing informatics competencies: the development and implementation of an online tool for self-assessment. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2013;3:70.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi E, Kim O, Jeong J. Development of the nursing informatics competence scale for nursing students. J Korean Nurs Res. 2019;32:47–59.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleib M, Nagle LM, Furlong KE, Paul P, Wisnesky UD, Ali S. Are future nurses ready for digital health? Informatics competency baseline assessment. Nurse Educ. 2022;47:E98–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Maksum A, Widiana IW, Marini A. Path analysis of self-regulation, social skills, critical thinking and problem-solving ability on social studies learning outcomes. Int J Instruction. 2021;14:613–28.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Staggers N, Gassert CA, Curran C. Informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. J Nurs Educ. 2001;40:303–16.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Raghunathan K, McKenna L, Peddle M. Baseline evaluation of nursing students’ informatics competency for digital health practice: a descriptive exploratory study. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231179051.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Qudah MM, Oweidat IA, Omar SA, Shosha GA, Dalky AA, Al-Mugheed K, et al. The relationship between nursing informatics competencies and clinical decision-making among registered nurses working at tertiary hospitals. Digit Health. 2025;11:20552076251346015.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Farzandipour M, Mohamadian H, Akbari H, Safari S, Sharif. Designing a National model for assessment of nursing informatics competency. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2021;21:35.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wisner K, Lyndon A, Chesla CA. The electronic health record’s impact on nurses’ cognitive work: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:74–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Facione NC, Facione PA, Sanchez CA. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Critical Thinking. Thorofare(NJ): SLACK Incorporated; 1994. p. 345-50.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Facione PA. Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Insight Assess. 2015;1:1–23.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul R, Elder L. The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield; 2019.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh JA, Kim EA, Kim HR. Influence of critical thinking disposition, clinical reasoning competence, and nursing practice environment on medication safety competence of hospital nurses. Healthcare. 2025;13:542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Karaca A, Kaya G, Kaya L. The relationship between critical thinking skills and caregiving roles of nurses. J Educ Res Nurs. 2023;20:360–6.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Nguyen T, Liu HE. Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2021;8:1970–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SU, Choi SY. Effects of critical thinking disposition, digital literacy, and nursing informatics competence on the competency in evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2024;30:1–10.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Li M, Chae Y, Ha Y. Relationships between use of information resources, critical thinking disposition, and nursing information literacy competency in nursing students. J Digit Converg. 2018;16:247–55.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Han SJ. The mediating effect of nursing informatics competency on the relationship between critical thinking disposition and evidence-based practice competency in nursing students. J Learn-Centered Curriculum Instruction. 2025;25:408–20.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Boso CM, van der Merwe AS, Gross J. Critical thinking disposition of nursing students: A quantitative investigation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;55:103167.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong H, Kim H, Kim J, Kim J. Validity and reliability validation of the Korean version of the brief Self-Control scale (BSCS). Korean J Psychol Gen. 2012;31:1193–210.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004;72:271–324.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Inzlicht M, Werner KM, Briskin JL, Roberts BW. Integrating models of self-regulation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021;72:319–45.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner KM, Milyavskaya M. Motivation and self-regulation: the role of want‐to motivation in the processes underlying self‐regulation and self‐control. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2019;13:e12425.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Govindan SN, Singh HK, Ling LW, Sekar M. Effect of blended self-directed learning on nursing students: Quasi-experimental approach. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong Y, Chen H, Duan Y. Focusing on self-control of nursing students in an era of rapid change. Int J Educ Humanit. 2025;18:181–5.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rua T, Lawter L, Andreassi J. Desire to be ethical or ability to self-control: which is more crucial for ethical behavior? Bus Ethics Eur Rev. 2017;26:288–99.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. Self-control scale. Curr Psychol. 2004;23(4):287-98.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahal RK, Ghimire B, Karki D, Joshi SP. Elevating job search effectiveness: the significance of self-directed learning and self-control. Intellect Econ. 2023;17:418–34.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tangney JP, Boone AL, Baumeister RF. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. In: Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, editors. Self-regulation and self-control. New York: Routledge; 2018. p. 173-212.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ifinedo P. Effects of security knowledge, self-control, and countermeasures on cybersecurity behaviors. J Comput Inf Syst. 2023;63:380–96.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim ON, Oh JW, Kim JH. Analysis of the relationship between nursing students’ internet ethics awareness, self-control, nursing professional intuition, and patient privacy protection awareness. J Converg Cult Technol. 2024;10:693–701.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Yeon. Effects of undergraduate nursing students’ internet ethics awareness, self-control, and critical thinking disposition on nursing informatics competency [master's thesis]. Gyeongsangbuk-do: Dongguk University; 2023.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon J. Development of an instrument for the measurement of critical thinking disposition [Unpublised doctoral disseration]. Seoul: The Catholic University of Korea; 2016.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi D. Effect of ethical sensitivity, critical thinking disposition and nursing informatics competency on artificial intelligence ethical awareness of nursing students. J Ind Converg. 2025;23(3):115–24
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim S, Yeon YR. Relationships between use of information resources, critical thinking disposition and nursing information literacy competency in nursing students. J Digit Converg. 2024;18(8):229–37
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi J, Bove L, Tarte V. Nursing informatics competency after experiencing simulated electronic health records: descriptive study. In: Nurses and midwives in the digital age. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2021. p. 143–7
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi J, De Martinis JE. Nursing informatics competencies: assessment of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(13–14):1970–6.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Afra A, Ban M, Bachari SS. Comparative study of nursing informatics competencies in educators, students and clinical nurses. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2024;11(4).
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang J, et al. Adoption of electronic health records in China during the past 10 years: consecutive survey data analysis and comparison of Sino-American challenges and experiences. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e24813.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Dougherty M, et al. Health information technology adoption and utilization in long-term and post-acute care settings [Internet]. National Library of Medicine; 2023. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalkhajeh SG, et al. The integrated electronic health system in Iranian health centers: benefits and challenges. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24(1):53.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Almarwani AM. Evaluation of the nursing informatics competency among nursing students: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024;78:104007.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Jo M, Ha Y. Development and validation of an instrument to measure nursing information literacy competency. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2019;30(1):25–37.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Jo E, Hwang SJ, Lee JH. Mediating effect of critical thinking disposition in the relationship between nursing information literacy competency and problem-solving ability of nursing students. J Korean Nurs Res. 2024;8(2):51–63.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Khajedaluee AR, Najafi M, Dadgarmoghaddam M. The relationship between critical thinking and information literacy in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences residents in 2020. Future Med Educ J. 2024;14(1).
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Lin M, Jin Q, Hu J. The effects of parental psychological control on critical thinking in middle school students: an analysis of chain mediating effects. Adv Psychol. 2022;12(10):3550–8.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsaleh NJ. Teaching critical thinking skills: literature review. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2020;19(1):21–39.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Papathanasiou IV, et al. Critical thinking: the development of an essential skill for nursing students. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(4):283.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SU, Choi SY. Effects of critical thinking disposition, digital literacy and nursing informatics competence on the competency in evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2024;30(1):1–10.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantek F, Yeşilbaş H. The effects of gender on problem-solving skills of nursing students in Turkey: a meta-analysis study. J Human Sci. 2019;16(1):134–42.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmoud AS, Mohamed HA. Critical thinking disposition among nurses working in public hospitals at Port-Said Governorate. Int J Nurs Sci. 2017;4(2):128–34.