Validity and reliability of the de Morton Mobility Index in the subacute hospital setting in a geriatric evaluation and management population.

Authors

  • Natalie A. de Morton
  • Kylie Lane

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0626

Keywords:

psychometrics, rehabilitation, geriatric assessment, ageing, validity, reliability, Rasch analysis.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) in a Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) population. DESIGN: A longitudinal validation study (n = 100) and inter-rater reliability study (n = 29) in a GEM population. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted to a GEM rehabilitation ward were eligible for inclusion. METHODS: At hospital admission and discharge, a physical therapist assessed patients with physical performance instruments that included the 6-metre walk test, step test, Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance, Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test and the DEMMI. Consecutively eligible patients were included in an inter-rater reliability study between physical therapists. RESULTS: DEMMI admission scores were normally distributed (mean 30.2, standard deviation 16.7) and other activity limitation instruments had either a floor or a ceiling effect. Evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity for the DEMMI were obtained. The minimal detectable change with 90% confidence was 10.5 (95% confidence interval 6.1-17.9) points and the minimally clinically important difference was 8.4 points on the 100-point interval DEMMI scale. CONCLUSION: The DEMMI provides clinicians with an accurate and valid method of measuring mobility for geriatric patients in the subacute hospital setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-10-17

How to Cite

de Morton, N. A., & Lane, K. (2010). Validity and reliability of the de Morton Mobility Index in the subacute hospital setting in a geriatric evaluation and management population. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(10), 956–961. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0626

Issue

Section

Original Report