Abstract
Background: To minimise the volume of blood used for diagnostic procedures, especially in children, we investigated whether the size of sample tubes affected whole blood coagulation analyses.
Methods: We included 20 healthy individuals for rotational thromboelastometry (RoTEM®) analyses and compared three blood sampling tubes of different size: 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 mL. All tubes were made of plastic and contained 3.2% sodium-citrate as anticoagulant. Platelet aggregation was investigated in 12 healthy individuals employing the Multiplate® Analyser comparing tubes of 3.6 mL and 1.8 mL. Platelet count was determined for each of the sampling tubes after 10, 60, and 120 min.
Results: No significant differences were found in any of the RoTEM® measurements between the three sizes of tubes (p=0.07–0.53). Platelet aggregation was significantly lower when using smaller tubes (p=0.0004). The platelet count remained stable using a 3.6 mL tube during the entire observation period of 120 min (p=0.74), but decreased significantly after 60 min when using tubes smaller than 3.6 mL (p<0.0001).
Conclusions: RoTEM® analyses were not affected by the size of blood sampling tubes. Therefore, 1.8 mL tubes should be preferred for RoTEM® analyses in order to minimise the volume of blood drawn. With regard to platelet aggregation analysed by impedance aggregometry tubes of different size cannot be used interchangeably. If platelet count is determined later than 10 min after blood sampling using tubes containing citrate as anticoagulant, a 3.6 mL tube should be preferred to avoid false low values.
References
1. Bateman ST, Lacroix J, Boven K, Forbes P, Barton R, Thomas NJ, et al. Anemia, blood loss, and blood transfusions in North American children in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:26–33.10.1164/rccm.200711-1637OCSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Armano R, Gauvin F, Ducruet T, Lacroix J. Determinants of red blood cell transfusions in a pediatric critical care unit: a prospective, descriptive epidemiological study. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2637–44.10.1097/01.CCM.0000185645.84802.73Search in Google Scholar
3. Nexo E, Christensen NC, Olesen H. Volume of blood removed for analytical purposes during hospitalization of low-birthweight infants. Clin Chem 1981;27:759–61.10.1093/clinchem/27.5.759Search in Google Scholar
4. Lippi G, Ippolito L, Zobbi V, Sandei F, Favaloro EJ. Sample collection and platelet function testing: influence of vacuum or aspiration principle on PFA-100 test results. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2013;24:666–9.10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835fada7Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Valentine SL, Bateman ST. Identifying factors to minimize phlebotomy-induced blood loss in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012;13:22–7.10.1097/PCC.0b013e318219681dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Favaloro EJ. Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012;38:565–75.10.1055/s-0032-1315961Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Adcock Funk DM, Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Quality standards for sample processing, transportation, and storage in hemostasis testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012;38:576–85.10.1055/s-0032-1319768Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Hubner U, Bockel-Frohnhofer N, Hummel B, Geisel J. The effect of a pneumatic tube transport system on platelet aggregation using optical aggregometry and the PFA-100. Clin Lab 2010;56:59–64.Search in Google Scholar
9. Thalen S, Forsling I, Eintrei J, Soderblom L, Antovic JP. Pneumatic tube transport affects platelet function measured by multiplate electrode aggregometry. Thromb Res 2013;132:77–80.10.1016/j.thromres.2013.04.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Glas M, Mauer D, Kassas H, Volk T, Kreuer S. Sample transport by pneumatic tube system alters results of multiple electrode aggregometry but not rotational thromboelastometry. Platelets 2013;24:454–61.10.3109/09537104.2012.718383Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Franchini M. Contemporary platelet function testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:579–98.10.1515/CCLM.2010.121Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Cattaneo M, Hayward CP, Moffat KA, Pugliano MT, Liu Y, Michelson AD. Results of a worldwide survey on the assessment of platelet function by light transmission aggregometry: a report from the platelet physiology subcommittee of the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1029.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03458.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Andreasen JB, Hvas AM, Christiansen K, Ravn HB. Can RoTEM® analysis be applied for haemostatic monitoring in paediatric congenital heart surgery? Cardiol Young 2011;21:684–91.10.1017/S1047951111000758Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Romlin BS, Wahlander H, Berggren H, Synnergren M, Baghaei F, Nilsson K, et al. Intraoperative thromboelastometry is associated with reduced transfusion prevalence in pediatric cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2011;112:30–6.10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fe4674Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Lang T, Bauters A, Braun SL, Potzsch B, von Pape KW, Kolde HJ, et al. Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM thromboelastometry. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005; 16:301–10.10.1097/01.mbc.0000169225.31173.19Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Ak K, Isbir CS, Tetik S, Atalan N, Tekeli A, Aljodi M, et al. Thromboelastography-based transfusion algorithm reduces blood product use after elective CABG: a prospective randomized study. J Card Surg 2009;24:404–10.10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00840.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Shore-Lesserson L, Manspeizer HE, DePerio M, Francis S, Vela-Cantos F, Ergin MA. Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;88:312–9.10.1213/00000539-199902000-00016Search in Google Scholar
18. Favaloro EJ, Funk DM, Lippi G. Pre-analytical variables in coagulation testing associated with diagnostic errors in hemostasis. LabMedicine 2012;43:1–10.10.1309/LM749BQETKYPYPVMSearch in Google Scholar
19. Straub A, Schiebold D, Wendel HP, Hamilton C, Wagner T, Schmid E, et al. Using reagent-supported thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic changes in congenital heart surgery employing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:641–7.10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Cammerer U, Dietrich W, Rampf T, Braun SL, Richter JA. The predictive value of modified computerized thromboelastography and platelet function analysis for postoperative blood loss in routine cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;96:51–7.10.1213/00000539-200301000-00011Search in Google Scholar
21. Calatzis A, Leitner M, Panzer S. Monitoring anticoagulation of primary haemostasis – estimation of platelet function in whole blood assays. Hämostaseologie 2009;29:279–84.10.1055/s-0037-1617037Search in Google Scholar
22. Karlsson M, Roman-Emanuel C, Thimour-Bergstrom L, Hakimi CS, Jeppsson A. Sampling conditions influence multiple electrode platelet aggregometry in cardiac surgery patients. Scand Cardiovasc J 2013;47:98–103.10.3109/14017431.2012.743672Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Lance MD, Henskens YM, Nelemans P, Theunissen MH, Oerle RV, Spronk HM, et al. Do blood collection methods influence whole-blood platelet function analysis? Platelets 2013; 24:275–81.10.3109/09537104.2012.689038Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Banfi G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G. The role of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) as in vitro anticoagulant for diagnostic purposes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:565–76.10.1515/CCLM.2007.110Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Bartels PC, Schoorl M, Lombarts AJ. Screening for EDTA-dependent deviations in platelet counts and abnormalities in platelet distribution histograms in pseudothrombocytopenia. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997;57:629–36.10.3109/00365519709055287Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Lippi G, Plebani M. EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia: further insights and recommendations for prevention of a clinically threatening artifact. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1281–5.10.1515/cclm-2012-0081Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Wayne PA. Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture. Approved standard 6th ed. CLSI document H3-A6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2007.Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
