Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T21:53:23.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental health law in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jürgen Zielasek
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Kliniken der Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
Wolfgang Gaebel
Affiliation:
LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Kliniken der Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany email wolfgang.gaebel@uniduesseldorf.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is no national mental health law in Germany: the 16 German states are responsible for legislation concerning forced admissions, while the German Civil Code covers non-acute care, in particular for those not able to care for themselves. In forensic psychiatry, both federal and state laws apply. This article describes this situation and provides figures about detentions and other aspects of mental health law in Germany.

Type
Mental Health Law Profiles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2015

References

Basdekis-Jozsa, R., Mokros, A., Vohs, K., et al (2013) Preventive detention in Germany: an overview and empirical data from two federal states. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31, 344358.Google Scholar
Gaebel, W. & Zielasek, J. (2012) Psychiatry in Germany 2012. International Review of Psychiatry, 24, 371378.Google Scholar
Steinböck, H. R. (2009) New developments in preventive detention in Germany. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 488491.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.