Clinical Research
Water Aerobics Reduces Sick Leave due to Low Back Pain During Pregnancy

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00066.xGet rights and content

Objective

To compare the effect of a land‐based, physical exercise program versus water aerobics on low back or pelvic pain and sick leave during pregnancy.

Design

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

Setting

Three antenatal care centers.

Participants

390 healthy pregnant women.

Interventions

A land‐based physical exercise program or water aerobic once a week during pregnancy.

Main Outcome Measures

Sick leave, pregnancy‐related low back pain or pregnancy‐related pelvic girdle pain, or both.

Results

Water aerobics diminished pregnancy‐related low back pain (p= .04) and sick leave due to pregnancy‐related low back pain (p= .03) more than a land‐based physical exercise program.

Conclusions

Water aerobics can be recommended for the treatment of low back pain during pregnancy. The benefits of a land‐based physical exercise program are questionable and further evaluation is needed.

Introduction

Pain from the pelvic area occurs often during pregnancy. The terms describing this condition vary, making study comparisons difficult (Stuge et al., 2003, Wu et al., (2004). Recently, the terms “pregnancy‐related pelvic girdle pain” (PPP) and “pregnancy‐related low back pain” (PLBP) have been proposed (Wu et al., 2004). More than one third of women experience back pain during pregnancy (Albert, 2001, Heiberg Endresen, 1995, Kristiansson et al., 1996, Mogren amd Pohjanen, 2005, Ostgaard and Andersson, 1991, Perkins et al., 1998, Rungee, 1993, Stuge et al., 2003, Wang et al., 2004, Wu et al., (2004, Young and Jewellw, 2002). This may interfere with work, daily activities, and sleep (Mens et al., 1996, Perkins et al., 1998; Young & Jewell). Low back pain (LBP) before pregnancy increases the risk for long‐standing LBP postpartum (Brynhildsen, Hansson, Persson, & Hammar, 1998). Long‐standing LBP begins during pregnancy in 10% to 15% of cases (Brynhildsen et al., 1998, Svensson et al., 1990).

Women with PPP will typically report fluctuating pain located at the sacroiliac joints, increased pain when turning in bed, and having a positive pain response to specific tests developed for PPP (Albert, Godskesen, & Westergaard, 2000). Management of pain from the pelvic area during pregnancy focuses on advice whereby no effective methods for treatment have been identified (Perkins et al., 1998). Low back pain may, of course, occur at any time and not just during pregnancy. Correct differentiation between PPP and PLBP is crucial for establishing correct care (Albert, 2001, Kristiansson et al., 1996; Perkins et al.; Wu et al., 2004). Pregnancy‐related pelvic girdle pain and PLBP symptoms may, however, overlap or occur simultaneously. Both PPP and PLBP can become long‐standing and prevention is important.

Moderate exercise is recommended at least three times a week during pregnancy to enhance maternal fitness and well‐being.

Based on the findings of Clapp et al. (Clapp, 1990, Clapp, 2000, Clapp et al., 2000), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends moderate exercise at least three times a week during pregnancy to enhance maternal fitness and well‐being (ACOG Technical Bulletin no. 189, 1994). In a randomized controlled trial, water aerobics seemed to reduce sick leave due to PLBP when compared to no physical exercise (Kihlstrand et al., 1996, Young and Jewellw, 2002). In the study by Kihlstrand et al. (1996), LBP was not defined and may have included women with pelvic pain as well. However, in present studies, it is unclear whether all physical exercise or only water aerobics are beneficial to women with PLBP or PPP (Brynhildsen et al., 1998, Perkins et al., 1998, Svensson et al., 1990).

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of land‐based physical exercise (LBPE) with water aerobics, on pain (PLBP and PPP) and sick leave in pregnant women.

Section snippets

Methods

Pregnant women were invited to participate in a study evaluating physical activity during pregnancy. Prior to inclusion, midwives provided verbal and written information about the study. Women were asked to fill out a registration protocol including written consent. Those responsible for antenatal care in the area and the Ethical Committee of Göteborg University approved the study.

Results

Out of 761 consecutively registered women, 325 did not meet the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Of 436 eligible women, 89.5% (n= 390) participated. Average gestational age at inclusion was 19 weeks (range 16‐29). Most participants started after an ultrasound examination at the 17th gestational week. A later start was mainly due to interruption of activities during summer months. Dropouts had a higher prevalence of multiparity compared to those completing the study (p= .009) but did not differ

Discussion

The incidence of PLBP and PPP during pregnancy in the current study is comparable to another Swedish study (Kihlstrand et al., 1996) but lower than reported in a Norwegian study (Heiberg Endresen, 1995). Furthermore, the duration of sick leave in this study is comparable to other Nordic studies (Björklund & Bergström, 2000; Kihlstrand et al.; Heiberg Endresen). Hansen, Vendelbo‐Jensen, and Larsen (1996)reported less sick leave. However, direct comparison is difficult due to divergent study

Conclusion

Water aerobics has been shown to diminish sick leave and can be recommended to pregnant women. Some doubts regarding the benefits of LBPE have been be raised.

References (25)

  • A. Hansen et al.

    Relaxin is not related to symptom‐giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnant women

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    (1996)
  • E. Heiberg Endresen

    Pelvic pain and low back pain in pregnant women—An epidemiological study

    Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Low back pain in pregnancy

      2021, Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text