Clinical Practice
Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei190Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Background

Reduced mouth opening may be a major contributing factor to the deterioration in the view obtained at laryngoscopy when a semi-rigid cervical collar is in place. We set out to assess the degree to which mouth opening is restricted by a cervical collar.

Methods

We measured maximal inter-incisor distance in 52 volunteers. It was measured again after application of each of three appropriately sized semi-rigid cervical collars (Stifneck, Miami J, and Philadelphia).

Results

Inter-incisor distance was significantly reduced by the application of a cervical collar [No collar 41 (7) mm–mean (sd); Stifneck 26 (8) P<0.0001; Miami J 29 (9) P<0.0001; Philadelphia 29 (9) P<0.0001]. There was a wide and unpredictable variation between subjects in the reduction in mouth opening and a significant proportion had an inter-incisor distance of 20 mm or less (Stifneck, 25%; Miami J, 21%; Philadelphia, 21%).

Conclusions

Application of a semi-rigid cervical collar can significantly reduce mouth opening. This could hinder definitive airway placement. Our results support removing the anterior portion of the collar before attempts at tracheal intubation.

Keywords

airway
assessment, pre-anaesthetic
equipment, collars
intubation, tracheal tube

Cited by (0)

Presented as a poster at the Difficult Airway Society Annual Scientific Meeting, Leicester, UK, November 25–26, 2004.