Original Contributions
Appropriateness of emergency department visits in a Portuguese University hospital,☆☆

Presented in part at the European Federation of Internal Medicine Second Congress, Florence, Italy, May 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.114306Get rights and content

Abstract

Study objective: There are no studies in Portugal supporting a common claim that most emergency department visits are inappropriate. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and to evaluate factors associated with an appropriate ED visit in a major public hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was performed at a public university hospital ED. Data for demographic variables, duration of complaint, transfer from other medical sources, and previous medical care for the same complaints were collected by interviewing all patients who arrived at the ED within a consecutive period of at least 24 hours. Data for diagnostic tests, treatment performed, and final patient destination were collected by triage records review. An appropriate ED visit was defined by explicit criteria: interhospital transfer, patient death at the ED, hospitalization, and diagnostic tests or treatments performed. Results: The study included 5,818 adult patients. The prevalence of an appropriate ED visit, by use of our criteria, was 68.7%. Sex was an effect modifier. According to this study, determinants of an appropriate visit for men and women were age 60 years or older and complaints of 24 hours or less and in women but not in men, retired from work and with arrival between midnight and 8 AM . Conclusions: In a university hospital in Oporto, the majority of ED visits were appropriate according to explicit criteria. Some variables may be associated with appropriateness of ED visits. A duration of the complaint 24 hours or less along with an arrival between midnight and 8 AM in women and age 60 years or older in men were the most important determinants. [Pereira S, Oliveira e Silva A, Quintas M, Almeida J, Marujo C, Pizarro M, Angélico V, Fonseca L, Loureiro E, Barroso S, Machado A, Soares M, da Costa AB, de Freitas AF. Appropriateness of emergency department visits in a Portuguese university hospital. Ann Emerg Med. June 2001;37:580-586.]

Introduction

Overcrowding in public hospital emergency departments has become a major concern in developed countries.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Inappropriate use of the ED for nonurgent problems has been suggested as a probable contributor to ED overcrowding1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16 and to an increase in health care costs.6, 13 The burden of inappropriate ED visits was estimated at different settings according to distinct criteria for determining the appropriateness of an ED visit.1, 12, 13, 17, 18 However, a generalization of these estimates is restricted by the lack of a universally accepted measurement of what constitutes an appropriate ED visit.1, 5, 12, 17, 18 As in other countries, factors for overcrowding in Portuguese EDs are assumed to be a consequence of inappropriate ED overuse.8 No studies in Portugal, at this time, have been concluded to support this assumption. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of appropriate ED visits in the setting of a major Oporto public teaching hospital and to assess factors associated with an appropriate ED visit.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted between February and September 1998 in the ED of Hospital de São João, a public university hospital with approximately 220,000 adult (13 years and older) ED visits annually. It is one of two teaching hospitals in Oporto and a reference hospital for the acute medical or trauma patients.

A previous official report stated the prevalence of appropriate ED visits in Portugal to be 20%,8 with 80% of visits reported to be inappropriate. We thus used this

Results

Table 1 illustrates the patient profile based on the personal questionnaire.

. Characteristics of the patients arriving at the ED for a visit.

CharacteristicNo. (%)*
Sex5,818 (100.0)
Male2,829 (48.6)
Female2,989 (51.4)
Age5,818 (100.0)
<60 y4,393 (75.5)
≥60 y1,425 (24.5)
Employment5,462 (93.9)
Salaried work2,687 (49.2)
Unsalaried work1,164 (21.3)
Retired from work1,331 (24.4)
Unemployed280 (5.1)
Level of education5,308 (91.2)
Less than basic1,074 (20.2)
Basic education2,603 (49.0)
More than basic1,631 (30.7)

Discussion

The ED at a public hospital is an essential part of the health care system because it provides care to all in need, especially those who are often unable to gain access to basic health services elsewhere.2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21 However, in most US and European cities, EDs have become overcrowded,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 raising concern about their availability to give medical care for all who need it.2, 3, 4, 21 It has been shown that overcrowding in the ED prolongs waiting

Acknowledgements

We thank Rui Maio, lecturer of epidemiology in ICBAS, Oporto University, for his contribution to the statistical analysis.

References (38)

  • JM Gill et al.

    Disagreement among health care professionals about the urgent care needs of emergency department patients

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1996)
  • DW Baker et al.

    Determinants of emergency department use by ambulatory patients at an urban public hospital

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1995)
  • EA. Ramoska

    Information sharing can reduce laboratory use by emergency physicians

    Am J Emerg Med

    (1998)
  • KV. Iserson

    Refusal of care: the ethical dilemma

    Ann Emerg Med.

    (1990)
  • R. Lieberman

    Refusal of care: the ethical dilemma

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1990)
  • GL. Henry

    Refusal of care: the ethical dilemma

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1990)
  • KV. Iserson

    Assessing values: rationing emergency department care

    Am J Emerg Med

    (1992)
  • DW Baker et al.

    Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • AB Bindman et al.

    Consequences of queuing for care at a public hospital emergency department

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by grant No. 172/97 from the Comissão de Fomento da Investigação em Cuidados de Saúde.

    ☆☆

    Address for reprints: António Oliveira e Silva, MD, Serviço de Medicina 2—Hospital de São João, Alameda Hernâni Monteiro, 4200, Porto, Portugal; 351-2-5025512, fax 351-2-5025512; E-mail [email protected] .

    View full text