Semin Hear 2020; 41(01): 037-054
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701244
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Emerging Technologies, Market Segments, and MarkeTrak 10 Insights in Hearing Health Technology

Brent Edwards
1   National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 February 2020 (online)

Abstract

Hearing health care is rapidly changing through innovation in technology, services, business models, and product categories. The introduction of hearables and over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids in particular will change the market for hearing help and the role of the hearing care professionals (HCPs). This article focuses on how these products will be differentiated from HCP-fit hearing aids through their ability to address the unmet needs of different consumer segments within the population of people with hearing dysfunction. The unmet hearing needs of each segment are discussed, and the size of each segment estimated, demonstrating a large potential market for hearables and a smaller potential market for hearing aids than has been previously mentioned in the literature. The results from MarkeTrak 10's survey of consumers' attitudes toward an OTC model are reviewed, showing that approximately half of both hearing aid owners and nonowners are uncomfortable doing hearing- and hearing aid–related tasks on their own without the assistance of an HCP and would be unlikely to purchase OTC hearing aids if available today. MarkeTrak data are also shown that demonstrate that the majority of hearing aid and personal sound amplification product owners believe that the HCP helped or would have helped with their hearing devices. Finally, challenges to OTC hearing aids becoming successful are discussed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Govindarajan V, Desai J. Innovation isn't just about new products. Harvard Business Review blog. 2013 . Available at: https://hbr.org/2013/09/innovation-isnt-just-about-new-products . Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 2 Sarampalis A, Kalluri S, Edwards B, Hafter E. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52 (05) 1230-1240
  • 3 Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (06) 600-610
  • 4 Hornsby BW. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (05) 523-534
  • 5 Weinstein BE, Sirow LW, Moser S. Relating hearing aid use to social and emotional loneliness in older adults. Am J Audiol 2016; 25 (01) 54-61
  • 6 Edwards B. The future of hearing aid technology. Trends Amplif 2007; 11 (01) 31-45
  • 7 Picou EM, Ricketts TA. An evaluation of hearing aid beamforming microphone arrays in a noisy laboratory setting. J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 30 (02) 131-144
  • 8 Visagie A, Swanepoel W, Eikelboom RH. Accuracy of remote hearing assessment in a rural community. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21 (11) 930-937
  • 9 Convery E, Keidser G, McLelland M, Groth J. A smartphone app to facilitate remote patient-provider communication in hearing health care: usability and effect on hearing aid outcomes. Telemed J E Health 2019 Doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0109 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 10 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: utilization of PSAPs and direct-mail hearing aids by people with hearing impairment. Hearing Rev 2010; 16 (06) 12-16
  • 11 Strom KE. BlameySaunders and the “Blended Model” in hearing aid dispensing. Hearing review. 2019 . Available at: http://www.hearingreview.com/2019/04/blog-blameysaunders-blended-model-hearing-aid-dispensing/ . Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 12 Hodsden S. FDA clears first at-home hearing test, pushes for hearing aid innovation. Available at: https://www.meddeviceonline.com/doc/fda-clears-first-at-home-hearing-test-pushes-for-hearing-aid-innovation-0001 . Published 2016. Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 13 Sandström J, Swanepoel W, Carel Myburgh H, Laurent C. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (04) 232-238
  • 14 Hunn N. The market for hearable devices 2016–2020. Available at: http://www.nickhunn.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/11/The-Market-for-Hearable-Devices-2016-2020.pdf . Published 2016. Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 15 President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Aging America & Hearing Loss: Imperative of Improved Hearing Technologies. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States; 2015
  • 16 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Hearing health care for adults: priorities for improving access and affordability. Available at: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2016/Hearing-Health-Care-for-Adults.aspx . Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 17 Warren E, Grassley C. Over-the-counter hearing aids: the path forward. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (05) 609-610
  • 18 Jerger J. Why do people without hearing loss have hearing complaints?. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22 (08) 490
  • 19 Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11 (42) 1-294
  • 20 Wingfield A, Tun PA, McCoy SL. Hearing loss in older adulthood: what it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005; 14 (03) 144-148
  • 21 Tahden MAS, Gieseler A, Meis M, Wagener KC, Colonius H. What keeps older adults with hearing impairment from adopting hearing aids?. Trends Hear 2018; 22: 2331216518809737
  • 22 Edwards B. What outsiders tell us about the hearing industry. Hearing Rev 2006; 13 (03) 88-92
  • 23 Spankovich C, Gonzalez VB, Su D, Bishop CE. Self reported hearing difficulty, tinnitus, and normal audiometric thresholds, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Hear Res 2017 Doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.001 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 24 Beck DL, Danhauer JL, Abrams HB. , et al. Audiologic considerations for people with normal hearing sensitivity yet hearing difficulty and/or speech-in-noise problems. Hearing Rev 2018; 25 (10) 28-38
  • 25 Abrams HB, Kihm J. An introduction to MarkeTrak IX: a new baseline for the hearing aid market. Hearing Rev 2015; 22 (06) 16
  • 26 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: the key influencing factors in hearing aid purchase intent. Hearing Rev 2012; 19 (03) 12-25
  • 27 Hickson L, Meyer C. Improving uptake and outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older adults: what are the barriers and facilitators?. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (Suppl. 01) S1-S2
  • 28 Wallhagen MI. The stigma of hearing loss. Gerontologist 2010; 50 (01) 66-75
  • 29 United States Census Bureau. Age and Sex Composition in the United States: 2018. Available at: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2018/demo/age-and-sex/2018-age-sex-composition.html . Accessed Aug 28, 2019
  • 30 Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clark TC. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2012. 2012 ;10. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_260.pdf . Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 31 Goman AM, Lin FR. Prevalence of hearing loss by severity in the United States. Am J Public Health 2016; 106 (10) 1820-1822
  • 32 Gates GA, Cooper Jr JC, Kannel WB, Miller NJ. Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear 1990; 11 (04) 247-256
  • 33 Garstecki D. Self-perceived hearing difficulty in aging adults with acquired hearing loss. J Acad Rehabilitative Audiol 1987; 20: 49-60
  • 34 Taylor B, Manchaiah V, Clutterbuck S. Using the personal assessment of communication abilities (PACA) tool. Hearing Rev 2016; 23 (03) 20
  • 35 Tremblay KL, Pinto A, Fischer ME. , et al. Self-reported hearing difficulties among adults with normal audiograms: the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (06) e290-e299
  • 36 Chien W, Lin FR. Prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172 (03) 292-293
  • 37 Popelka MM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46 (09) 1075-1078
  • 38 Strom KE. Hearing aid sales increase by 4.8% in 2014; RICs continue market domination. Hearing Rev 2015; 22 (03) 6
  • 39 Strom KE. The invisible hand. Hearing Rev 2016; 23 (02) 6
  • 40 Strom KE. Hearing sales up 8.7% in 2016. Hearing Rev 2017; 24 (02) 6
  • 41 Strom KE. Hearing aid sales increase by 3.4% in 2017. Hearing Rev 2018; 25 (02) 6
  • 42 Strom KE. Hearing aid sales increase by 5.3% in 2018; fall just short of 4-million. Hearing Rev 2019; 26 (02) 6
  • 43 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. Hear J 2010; 63 (01) 19-32
  • 44 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VII - obstacles to adult non-adoption of hearing aids. Hear J 2007; 60 (04) 24-50
  • 45 Ramage-Morin PL, Banks R, Pineault D, Atrach M. Unperceived hearing loss among Canadians aged 40 to 79. Health Rep 2019; 30 (08) 11-20
  • 46 Ferguson M, Brandreth M, Brassington W, Leighton P, Wharrad H. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of a multimedia educational program for first-time hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (02) 123-136
  • 47 Convery E, Keidser G, Hickson L, Meyer C. Factors associated with successful setup of a self-fitting hearing aid and the need for personalized support. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (04) 794-804
  • 48 Hickson L, Meyer C, Lovelock K, Lampert M, Khan A. Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (Suppl. 01) S18-S27
  • 49 Saunders GH, Lewis MS, Forsline A. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (05) 320-334
  • 50 Kochkin S, Beck DL, Christensen LA. , et al. MarkeTrak VIII: the impact of the hearing healthcare professional on hearing aid user success. Hearing Rev 2010; 17 (04) 12-34
  • 51 Uriarte M, Denzin L, Dunstan A, Sellars J, Hickson L. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (06) 383-402
  • 52 Arlinger S, Nordqvist P, Öberg M. International outcome inventory for hearing aids: data from a large Swedish Quality Register database. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (3S): 443-450
  • 53 Dillon H, Seeto M, Beechey T, Hickson L. Are good outcomes driven by good devices, good clinicians, or good clients?. 34th World Congress of Audiology; 2018; Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
  • 54 Humes LE, Kinney DL, Main AK, Rogers SE. A follow-up clinical trial evaluating the consumer-decides service delivery model. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (01) 69-84
  • 55 Humes LE, Rogers SE, Quigley TM, Main AK, Kinney DL, Herring C. The effects of service-delivery model and purchase price on hearing-aid outcomes in older adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (01) 53-79
  • 56 Mahomed F, Swanepoel W, Eikelboom RH, Soer M. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (06) 745-752
  • 57 van Tonder J, Swanepoel W, Mahomed-Asmail F, Myburgh H, Eikelboom RH. Automated smartphone threshold audiometry: validity and time efficiency. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (03) 200-208
  • 58 Edwards B. Understanding new and emerging categories of hearing devices. ENT Audiol News 2019; 28 (05) 51-52
  • 59 Van Tasell DJ, Sabin A, Franck K. User self-adjustment of a simulated hearing aid using a mobile device. International Hearing Aid Research Conference; August, 2014; Lake Tahoe, CA
  • 60 Valentine S, Dundas JA, Fitz K. Evidence for the use of a new patient-centered fitting tool. Hearing Rev 2011; 18 (04) 28-34