Cesarean section increases the risk of respiratory adaptive disorders in healthy late preterm and two groups of mature newborns

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The rates of delivery by Cesarean section (CS) have been trending upwards in recent decades, perhaps leading to higher rates of dysfunction in respiratory adaptation in newborns. We present epidemiological data for pulmonary adaptation by mode of delivery for healthy late preterm and term infants born at a regional tertiary care center. The overall CS rate was 22% with the largest proportion of these in late preterms (39%). This drops to 30% in infants born after 37 weeks gestation and to 11% for those born after 40 weeks. Infants needing respiratory support decreased significantly as gestational age increased: 88% at 34 weeks, 67% at 35 weeks, 28% at 36 weeks, 17% at 37 weeks and 8% at 40 weeks. The risk of respiratory morbidity following CS as compared to vaginal delivery (VD) was substantially higher. 50% of infants born by CS needed respiratory support compared to only 12% following VD. 82% of all late preterm infants born by CS developed respiratory morbidity compared to 36% following VD. Comparable data for infants born after 37 and 40 weeks gestation were 33% compared to 9% and 26% compared to 6% respectively. Late preterm infants born after 36 weeks gestation showed the most marked difference by mode of birth with 66% needing respiratory support following CS as compared to only 9% following VD. Our data could be useful in counselling parents about risk associated with delivery by Cesarean section. A critical view should be taken of increasing CS rates worldwide because of a clear correlation in increased morbidity in infants, especially late preterm infants.

Zusammenfassung

Die Kaiserschnittrate erhöhte sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten in zahlreichen geburtshilflichen Kliniken. Diese Entwicklung ist problematisch, weil damit eine erhöhte Morbidität der Neugeborenen verbunden ist.Die Arbeit untersucht die Anpassung von späten Frühgeborenen (34,0–36,6 SSW) und reifen Neugeborenen (37,0–37,6 und 40,6–40,6 SSW) in Abhängigkeit vom Geburtsmodus. Eingeschlossen wurden primär gesunde Kinder. Ausgeschlossen wurden Kinder mit angeborener Anomalie und Kinder mit einer schweren Anpassungsstörung (Apgar 5‘<6).Die Kaiserschnittrate lag bei 22% und war am höchsten bei späten Frühgeborenen (39%) im Vergleich zu Kindern der 37. (30%) und der 40. SSW (11%).Die Rate der Kinder, die mit CPAP behandelt werden mussten fiel von 88% in der 34. SSW auf 17% in der 37. und 8% in der 40. SSW. Kinder nach Kaiserschnitt mussten im Vergleich zur Spontangeburt häufiger mit CPAP therapiert werden (50 vs. 12%). Dieser Unterschied war für späte Frühgeborene deutlich (82 vs. 36%), mit einem Maximum in der 36. SSW (66 vs. 9%) und lag niedriger bei Kindern der 37. (33 vs. 9%) und 40. SSW (26 vs. 6%).Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass ein Kaiserschnitt zu einer schlechteren respiratorischen Anpassung führt. Dies gilt für späte Frühgeborene aber auch für reife Kinder.Eine Kaiserschnittentbindung führt zu einer erhöhten Rate an respiratorischen Anpassungsstörungen, zur neonatologischen Aufnahme der Kinder, zu Störung der Mutter-Kind-Bindung, sowie zu einer finanziellen Belastung des Gesundheitssystems. Es ist zu wünschen, dass die Daten der Studie benutzt werden, um immer den besten Geburtsweg für das Kind zu finden.

• References

• 1 De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O et al. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e1064-e1071
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordström L. Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 92: 181-185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Reddy UM, Chia-Wen K, Tonse NKR et al. Delivery indications at Late Preterm Gestations and Infant Mortality Rates in the United States. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 234-240
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Champion V, Durrmeyer X, Dassieu G. Short-term respiratory outcome of late preterm newborn in a center of level III. Arch Pediatr 2010; 17: 19-25
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Tsai ML, Lien R, Chiang MC et al. Prevalence and morbidity of late preterm infants: current status in a medical center of Northern Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol 2012; 53: 171-177
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Malin GL, Morris RK, Khan KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 340: c1471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Casey BM, Goldaber KG, McIntire DD et al. Outcomes among term infants when two-hour postnatal pH is compared with pH at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 447-450
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Holland GM, Refuerzo JS, Ramin SM et al. Late preterm birth: how often is it avoidable?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 404e1-404e4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91: 1422-1427
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Dabbas M, Al-Sumadi A. Cesarean section rate: much room for reduction. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2007; 34: 146-148
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 D’Souza SW, Black P, Cadman J et al. Umbilical venous blood pH: a useful aid in the diagnosis of asphyxia at birth. Arch Dis Child 1983; 58: 15-19
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Catlin EA, Carpenter MW, Brann 4th BS et al. The APGAR score revisited: influence of gestational age. J Pediatr 1986; 109: 865-868
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Hegyi T, Carbone T, Anwar M et al. The APGAR score and its components in the preterm infant. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 77-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Gouyon JB, Vintejoux A, Sagot P et al. Burgundy Perinatal Network. Neonatal outcome associated with singleton birth at 34–41 weeks of gestation. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39: 769-776
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Mally PV, Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Bailey S. Incidence and etiology of late preterm admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit and its associated respiratory morbidities when compared to term infants. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30: 425-431
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Wang JD, Wang TM, Chi CS. Clinical spectrum of acute respiratory distress syndrome in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2003; 44: 202-207
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ma X, Huang C, Lou S et al. Provincial Collaborative Study Group for Late-Preterm Infants. The clinical outcomes of late preterm infants: a multi-center survey of Zhejiang, China. J Perinat Med 2009; 37: 695-699
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Celik IH, Demirel G, Canpolat FE et al. A common problem for neonatal intensive care units: late preterm infants, a prospective study with term controls in a large perinatal center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 459-462
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Herz K, Wohmuth P, Liedtke B et al. Late preterms: the influence of foetal gender on neonatal outcome. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2012; 216: 141-146
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kent AL, Wright IM, Abdel-Latif ME. New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Neonatal Intensive Care Units Audit Group . Mortality and adverse neurologic outcomes are greater in preterm male infants. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 124-131
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F et al. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with “no indicated risk”. United States, 1998–2001 birth cohorts. Birth 2006; 33: 175-182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Malloy MH. Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000–2003. Birth 2009; 36: 26-33
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Visser GH. Woman are designed to deliver vaginally and not by Cesarean section: An obstetrician’s View. Neonatology 2015; 107: 8-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Malloy MH. Antenatal steroid use and neonatal outcome: United States 2007. J Perinatol 2012; 32: 722-727
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Porto AM, Coutinho IC, Correia JB et al. Effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids in reducing respiratory disorders in late preterm infants: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2011; 342: d1696
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Marciniak B, Patro-Małysza J, Poniedziałek-Czajkowska E et al. Glucocorticoids in pregnancy. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2011; 12: 750-757
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Gouyon JB, Iacobelli S, Ferdynus C et al. Neonatal problems of late and moderate preterm infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17: 146-152
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material