Totgeburten in Deutschland: Retrospektive Datenanalyse von 168 Fällen zwischen 2003 und 2011

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die Reduktion der Totgeburten stagniert seit einigen Jahren in Deutschland. Ziele dieser Studie sind die Gründe dafür zu ermitteln, die Dokumentation und Aufarbeitung der Fälle zu analysieren und Möglichkeiten der Prävention zu finden.

Methoden: Internationale Literaturrecherche, retrospektive Datenerhebung von 168 Totgeburten an 8 Kliniken (Uniklinik Bonn und Umgebung) mit anschließender statistischer Auswertung (deskriptive Statistik, t-Test, Binominaltest).

Ergebnisse: Deutliche Mängel zeigen sich sowohl in der aktuellen Datendokumentation, der interdisziplinären Zusammenarbeit sowie der postmortalen qualitativen und quantitativen Aufarbeitung. In nur 51,8% (87/168) der Fälle konnten sichere oder unsichere Todesursachen identifiziert werden (42,3% plazentar, 1,2% fetal, 3,6% chromosomal, 4,8% Nabelschnurauffälligkeiten). 29,2% (49/168) der verstorbenen Feten waren stark wachstumsretardiert (<5. Perzentile), 44,9% (22/49) dieser Feten wiesen ein Gestationsalter von ≥36+0 SSW auf.

Schlussfolgerungen: Der erste Schritt zur Reduktion der Totgeburtenrate in Deutschland ist die Steigerung der Aufklärungsrate der fetalen Todesursachen: Deshalb wurde zur Verbesserung der Dokumentation und der Interdisziplinarität ein fächerübergreifender Datenerfassungsbogens erstellt. Durch einen Algorithmus soll das postmortale Vorgehen standardisiert und vervollständigt werden. Ein langfristiges Ziel ist die Entwicklung einer zentralen Datenregistrierung zur statistischen Auswertungen der fetalen Todesursachen, der Identifikation von Forschungsfragen und der Organisation von Konferenzen mit interdisziplinärer Befundbesprechung.

Abstract

Background: The decline in the incidence of stillbirths in Germany has remained static in recent years. This study aims to analyse the current situation of data documentation and examination of stillbirths. Furthermore, possible stillbirth prevention strategies should be developed.

Methods: Searches in the international peer-reviewed literature, retrospective data collection of 168 stillbirths in 8 hospitals, (in the area of Bonn) with subsequent statistical evaluation (descriptive statistics, t-test and binominal test) were undertaken.

Results: This study shows considerable deficits in data documentation, interdisciplinary communication and postmortal examination. Only in 51.8% (87/168) of the cases was a certain or uncertain cause of death found (42.3% placental, 1.2% foetal, 3.6% chromosomal, 4.8% umbilical cord abnormalities). Severe foetal growth restriction (<5^th percentile) was observed in 29.2%; 44.9% (22/49) of them died at the age of ≥36+0 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion: The first step to reduce the rate of stillbirths in Germany is to increase the identified causes of foetal death: Therefore, an interdisciplinary case report form was compiled to improve data collection and interdisciplinary collaboration. To standardise and complete postmortal management, an algorithm was created. The long-term aim is the development of a central data register for statistical analysis, to identify goals of research and to organise conferences with interdisciplinary reports of diagnostic findings.

• Literatur

• 1 Cacciatore J. Stillbirth: patient-centered psychosocial care. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 691-699
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cacciatore J. The unique experiences of women and their families after the death of a baby. Soc Work Health Care 2010; 49: 134-148
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Froen JF, Cacciatore J, McClure EM et al. Stillbirths: why they matter. Lancet 2011; 377: 1353-1366
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Gausia K, Moran AC, Ali M et al. Psychological and social consequences among mothers suffering from perinatal loss: perspective from a low income country. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 451
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Trulsson O, Radestad I. The silent child – mothers‘ experiences before, during, and after stillbirth. Birth 2004; 31: 189-195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Turton P, Evans C, Hughes P. Long-term psychosocial sequelae of stillbirth: phase II of a nested case-control cohort study. Arch Womens Ment Health 2009; 12: 35-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Statistissches Bundesamt Deutschland . Lange Reihe der Eheschließungen, Geborene und Gestorbene. http://www.destatis.de letzter Datenzugriff: 10.06.2013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerunsforschung . Perinatalsterblichkeit in Deutschland, West- und Ostdeutschland, von 1955 bis 2012. http://www.bib-demografie.de , letzter Datenzugriff: 10.06.2013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Voigt M, Schneider KTM, Jährig K. Analyse des Geburtengutes des Jahrgangs 1992 der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 1996; 56: 550-558
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kidron D, Bernheim J, Aviram R. Placental findings contributing to fetal death, a study of 120 stillbirths between 23 and 40 weeks gestation. Placenta 2009; 30: 700-704
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gordijn SJ, Erwich JJ, Khong TY. Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5: 480-488
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Tjong C. Einzelfallanalysen von Totgeburten – retrospektive 5-Jahre-Analyse an einem Perinatalzentrum unter Berücksichtigung der Vermeidungsfaktoren. 2003; 144
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Korteweg FJ, Gordijn SJ, Timmer A et al. The Tulip classification of perinatal mortality: introduction and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement. BJOG 2006; 113: 393-401
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Varli IH, Petersson K, Bottinga R et al. The Stockholm classification of stillbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 1202-1212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Horn LC, Langner A, Stiehl P et al. Identification of the causes of intrauterine death during 310 consecutive autopsies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113: 134-138
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Fretts R. Stillbirth epidemiology, risk factors, and opportunities for stillbirth prevention. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 588-596
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Smith GC, Fretts RC. Stillbirth. Lancet 2007; 370: 1715-1725
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Huang L, Sauve R, Birkett N et al. Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review. CMAJ 2008; 178: 165-172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Reddy UM, Ko CW, Willinger M. Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 764-770
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Fretts RC. Etiology and prevention of stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1923-1935
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Chibber R. Unexplained antepartum fetal deaths: what are the determinants?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271: 286-291
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Luque-Fernandez MA, Lone NI, Gutierrez-Garitano I et al. Stillbirth risk by maternal socio-economic status and country of origin: a population-based observational study in Spain, 2007–08. Eur J Public Health 2011;
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Stephansson O, Dickman PW, Johansson AL et al. The influence of socioeconomic status on stillbirth risk in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1296-1301
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Salihu HM, Dunlop AL, Hedayatzadeh M et al. Extreme obesity and risk of stillbirth among black and white gravidas. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 552-557
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1175-1182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Stephansson O, Dickman PW, Johansson A et al. Maternal weight, pregnancy weight gain, and the risk of antepartum stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 463-469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Coletta J, Simpson LL. Maternal medical disease and stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 607-616
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Cundy T, Gamble G, Townend K et al. Perinatal mortality in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 33-39
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Penney GC, Mair G, Pearson DW. Outcomes of pregnancies in women with type 1 diabetes in Scotland: a national population-based study. BJOG 2003; 110: 315-318
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Zetterstrom K, Lindeberg SN, Haglund B et al. The association of maternal chronic hypertension with perinatal death in male and female offspring: a record linkage study of 866,188 women. BJOG 2008; 115: 1436-1442
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Werner EF, Lockwood CJ. Thrombophilias and stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 617-627
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Kujovich JL. Thrombophilia and pregnancy complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 412-424
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Rogers JM. Tobacco and pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2009; 28: 152-160
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Cnattingius S, Lambe M. Trends in smoking and overweight during pregnancy: prevalence, risks of pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2002; 26: 286-295
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Reeske A, Kutschmann M, Razum O et al. Stillbirth differences according to regions of origin: an analysis of the German perinatal database, 2004–2007. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Willinger M, Ko CW, Reddy UM. Racial disparities in stillbirth risk across gestation in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 469 e461-469 e468
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Reime B, Lindwedel U, Ertl KM et al. Does underutilization of prenatal care explain the excess risk for stillbirth among women with migration background in Germany?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 1276-1283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Poon LC, Volpe N, Muto B et al. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of stillbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33: 28-35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Unterscheider J, O’Donoghue K, Daly S et al. Fetal growth restriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studies from the multicentre PORTO study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010; 341: c7087
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Tajik P, van Wyk L, Boers KE et al. Which intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term benefit from early labour induction? A secondary analysis of the DIGITAT randomised trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 172: 20-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 288-300
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B et al. The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011; 25: 2-10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Bukowski R. Stillbirth and fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 673-680
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Poon LC, Volpe N, Muto B et al. Birthweight with gestation and maternal characteristics in live births and stillbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 32: 156-165
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Wapner RJ. Genetics of stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 628-634
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Germer U. Diagnostik und Management nach Totgeburt. FOKO 2012 Gynkongress Ausgabe 3, Publimed 2012; 1
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Silver RM, Heuser CC. Stillbirth workup and delivery management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 681-690
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Crombach G, Vetter K. Intrauterine Wachstumsrestriktion Teil II. Klinisches Management. Der Gynäkologe 2007; 16
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Pinar H, Carpenter M. Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 656-672
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Khong TY. The placenta in stillbirth. Elsevier; 2006: 11
  Google Scholar
• 52 Enid Gilbert-Barness DED-S . Pediatric Autopsy – fetus, newborn and child. In: Press H. Hrsg Handbook of Pediatric Autopsy Pathology. Totowa: New Jersey; 2005: 7-41
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 53 Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2185-2193
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material