Proximale Humerusfraktur

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die proximale Humerusfraktur gehört zu den typischen Altersfrakturen mit zunehmender Inzidenz. Es resultieren komplexe Frakturmuster. Röntgenaufnahmen in 2 Ebenen stellen die Basisdiagnostik dar. Häufig ist eine weiterführende CT-Diagnostik zur Erfassung des gesamten Frakturausmaßes notwendig. Die Dislokationsgrenzen für die operative Therapie werden zunehmend enger gesteckt. Vorteile der operativen Therapie sind die Möglichkeit zur frühfunktionellen Nachbehandlung und die schnelle Reintegration in den Alltag. Winkelstabile Nagel- und Plattenosteosynthese als konkurrierende Verfahren werden favorisiert. Tendenziell wird die Plattenosteosynthese bei höhergradigen Frakturen bevorzugt. Nicht rekonstruierbare Frakturen indizieren die Implantation einer primären Frakturprothese, zunehmend empfohlen in Form einer inversen Prothese beim über 75-jährigen Patienten.

Literatur

• 1 Antuña S A, Sperling J W, Cofield R H. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;  17 202-209
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bahrs C, Rolauffs B, Südkamp N P et al. Indications for computed tomography (CT-) diagnostics in proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study of plain radiography and computed tomography.  BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;  2 33
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bastian J D, Hertel R. Initial post-fracture humeral head ischemia does not predict development of necrosis.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;  17 2-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Blonna D, Rossi R, Fantino G et al. The impacted varus (A2.2) proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients: is minimal fixation justified? A case control study.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;  18 545-552
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Blum J, Hansen M, Rommens P M. Angle-stable intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures with the PHN (proximal humeral nail).  Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009;  21 296-311
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Bogner R, Hübner C, Matis N et al. Minimally-invasive treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;  90 1602-1607
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis.  J Orthop Trauma. 2009;  23 163-172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Codman E A. Rupture of the Supraspinatus tendon and other Lesions in or about the subacromial Bursa. Codman EA, eds. The Shoulder. Thomas Todd 1934: 262-293
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Court-Brown C M, Garg A, McQueen M M. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.  Acta Orthop. 2001;  72 365-371
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Dietrich M, Meier C, Lattmann T et al. Komplexe proximale Humerusfraktur beim alten Menschen – Winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese vs. Hemiarthroplastik.  Chirurg. 2008;  79 231-240
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Dimakopoulos P, Panagopoulos A, Kasimatis G. Transosseous suture fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Surgical technique.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;  (Suppl. 2, Pt 1) 8-21
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Einsiedel T, Becker C, Stengel D et al. Frakturen der oberen Extremität beim geriatrischen Patienten – Harmlose Monoverletzung oder Ende der Selbständigkeit?.  Z Gerontol Geriat. 2006;  39 451-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Falborg B, Palm H, Fenger A M et al. Outcome of cemented Neer II hemiarthroplasty in displaced humeral head fractures.  Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;  74 7-12
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G et al. A locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus.  Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2005;  430 176-181
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P et al. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases.  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;  95 48-55
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Gardner M J, Weil Y, Barker J U et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.  J Orthop Trauma. 2007;  21 185-191
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gerber C, Werner C M, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;  86 848-855
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Gradl G, Dietze A, Kääb M et al. Is locking nailing of humeral head fractures superior to locking plate fixation?.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;  467 2986-2993
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;  88 1742-1747
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Habermeyer P. Die Humeruskopffraktur.  Unfallchirurg. 1997;  100 820-837
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hanson B, Neidenbach P, de Boer P et al. Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;  18 612-621
  Google Scholar
• 22 Hepp P, Lill H, Bail H et al. Where should implants be anchored in the humeral head?.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;  415 139-147
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Hertel R. Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone.  Osteoporos Int. 2005;  16 65-72
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S et al. Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly Finnish persons: sharp increase in 1970–1998 and alarming projections for the new millennium.  Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;  71 465-470
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V et al. Die winkelstabile Osteosynthese am proximalen Humerus mit der PHILOS-Platte. Darstellung von 225 dislozierten Frakturen.  Unfallchirurg. 2006;  109 1032-1040
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B et al. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis.  J Orthop Trauma. 2008;  22 698-670
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Kralinger F, Unger S, Wambacher M et al. The medial periosteal hinge, a key structure in fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical cadaver study of its mechanical properties.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;  91 973-976
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Kristiansen B, Anderson U L, Olsen C A et al. The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. An assessment of interobserver variation.  Skeletal Radiol. 1988;  17 420-422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D et al. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;  17 42-54
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Lauritzen J B, Schwarz P, Lund B et al. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures.  Osteoporos Int. 1993;  3 127-132
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Lill H, Hepp P, Rose T et al. Die winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese (LPHP) proximaler Humerusfrakturen über den kleinen anterolateralen Delta-Splitting-Zugang – Technik und erste Ergebnisse.  Zentralbl Chir. 2004;  129 43-48
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Lill H, Hepp P, Gowin W et al. Age- and gender-related distribution of bone mineral density and mechanical properties of the proximal humerus.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2002;  174 1544-1550
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Lill H, Josten C. Proximale und distale Humerusfrakturen im hohen Alter.  Orthopäde. 2000;  29 327-341
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Maravic M, Le Bihan C, Landais P et al. Incidence and cost of osteoporotic fractures in France during 2001. A methodological approach by the national hospital database.  Osteoporos Int. 2005;  16 1475-1480
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Meyer C, Alt V, Hassanin H et al. The arteries of the humeral head and their relevance in fracture treatment.  Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;  27 232-237
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Mittlmeier T W, Stedtfeld H W, Ewert A et al. Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with an angular and sliding stable antegrade locking nail (Targon PH).  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;  85 (Suppl. 4) 136-146
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Müller M, Nazarian S, Koch P et al. The comprehensive classification of 8 fractures of the long bones. Heidelberg; Springer 1990
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Neer C S. Displaced proximal humerus fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;  52 1077-1089
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Owsley K C, Gorczyca J T. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;  90 233-240 , Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 862
  
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Park M C, Murthi A M, Roth N S et al. Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation.  J Orthop Trauma. 2003;  17 319-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Oberleitner G et al. Displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.  J Trauma. 2008;  65 843-848
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Popescu D, Fernandez-Valencia J A, Rios M et al. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the T2-proximal humeral nail.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;  129 1239-1244
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Resch H. Die Humeruskopffraktur.  Unfallchirurg. 2003;  106 602-617
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Resch H, Beck E, Bayley I. Reconstruction of valgus-impacted humeral head fracture.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;  4 73-80
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Resch H, Beck E, Bayley J. Reconstruction of valgus impacted humeral head fractures – Indication, technique and long-term results.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1985;  4 73-80
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Sallay P I, Pedowitz R A, Mallon W J et al. Reliability and reproducibility of radiographic interpretations of proximal humeral fracture pathoanatomy.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;  6 60-69
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Shahid R, Mushtaq A, Northover J et al. Outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated by PHILOS plate internal fixation. Experience of a district general hospital.  Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;  74 602-608
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Solberg B D, Moon C N, Franco D P et al. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;  91 1689-1697
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Solberg B D, Moon C N, Franco D P et al. Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome.  J Orthop Trauma. 2009;  23 113-119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures using the locking proximal humerus plate – Results of a prospective multicenter observational study.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;  91 1320-1328
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Tejwani N C, Liporace F, Walsh M et al. Functional outcome following one-part proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;  17 216-219
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Voigt C, Geisler A, Lill H. Arthroscopic locking plate removal after proximal humeral fractures.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;  130 391-395
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Voigt C, Hurschler C, Rech L et al. Biomechanical evaluation of additive fiber-cerclage in proximal humeral fractures stabilized by locking plates.  Acta Orthop. 2009;  80 465-471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Voigt C, Ewig M, Vosshenrich R et al. Die diagnostische Wertigkeit des MRT bei proximalen Humerusfrakturen im Vergleich zur Computertomographie und konventionellem Röntgen.  Unfallchirurg. 2010;  113 (5) 378-385
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Voigt C, Woltmann A, Partenheimer A et al. Komplikationsmanagement nach winkelstabiler Plattenosteosynthese.  Chirurg. 2007;  78 40-46
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Voigt C, Lill H. Indikation zur Operation und operative Differentialtherapie. Lill H Die proximale Humerusfraktur. Stuttgart; Thieme 2006: 46-78
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. Helmut Lill
PD Dr. med. Christine Voigt

Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie
Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstift gGmbH Hannover

Humboldtstraße 5

30169 Hannover

Email: helmut.lill@ddh-gruppe.de