Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A comparison of two-fingers technique and two-thumbs encircling hands technique of chest compression in neonates

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the proportion of correct placements (POCP) between two-fingers’ and ‘two-thumbs’ techniques of chest compression among neonates of various gestations.

Study Design:

Two-fingers and two-thumbs spans of 32 adult rescuers were individually compared with the inter-nipple line to sterno-xiphoid junction distance of 39 neonates. ‘Correct placement’ was defined if two-fingers/two-thumbs span was equal to or less than the inter-nipple line to sterno-xiphoid junction distance. The POCPs was compared between two-fingers and two-thumbs methods of chest compression by the McNemar test among neonates and their various subgroups.

Result:

There were a total of 1248 comparisons. The POCPs with two-fingers and two-thumbs techniques were 6.7 and 77% in all neonates, 10.6 and 89.5% in full term and 1.2 and 59% in preterm neonates, respectively (P<0.001).

Conclusion:

Two-thumbs technique achieved higher POCPs and should be preferred over two-fingers technique among neonates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, Colby C, Fairchild K, Gallagher J et al. Circulation 2010; 122: S909–S919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Menegazzi JJ, Auble TE, Nicklas KA, Hosack GM, Rack L, Goode JS . Two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression during CRP in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 240–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Houri PK, Frank LR, Menegazzi JJ, Taylor R . A randomized, controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997; 1: 65–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Udassi JP, Udassi S, Theriaque DW, Shuster JJ, Zaritsky AL, Haque IU . Effect of alternative chest compression techniques in infant and child on rescuer performance. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009; 10: 328–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christman C, Hemway RJ, Wyckoff MH, Perlman JM . The two-thumb is superior to the two-finger method for administering chest compressions in a manikin model of neonatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96: F99–F101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. David R . Closed chest cardiac massage in the newborn infant. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 552–554.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thaler MM, Stobie GH . An improved technique of external cardiac compression in infants and young children. N Engl J Med 1963; 269: 606–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips GWL, Zideman DA . Relation of the infant heart to sternum: its significance in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lancet 1986; 1: 1024–1025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orlowski JP . Optimum position for external cardiac compression in infants and young children. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 5: 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finholt DA, Kettick RG, Wagner HR, Swedlow DB . The heart is under the lower one third of the sternum. Am J Dis Child 1986; 140: 646–649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thaler MM, Krause VW . Serious trauma in children after external cardiac massage. New Engl J Med 1962; 267: 500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clements F, McGowan J . Finger position for chest compressions in cardiac arrest in infants. Resuscitation 2000; 44: 43–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E . Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics 1966; 37: 403–408.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivan Y, Merlob P, Reisner SH . Sternal length, torso length, and internipple distance in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1983; 72: 523–525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorfsman ML, Menegazzi JJ, Wadas RJ, Auble TE . Two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in an infant model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7: 1077–1082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitelaw CC, Slywka B, Goldsmith LJ . Comparison of a two-finger versus two-thumb method for chest compressions by healthcare providers in an infant mechanical model. Resuscitation 2000; 43: 213–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Authors contribution

Shiv Sajan Saini conceived the idea, planned the study, did statistical analysis and wrote the initial draft. Neeraj Gupta extracted, analyzed and summarized the data. Praveen Kumar planned the study, supervised data analysis, revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and finalized the manuscript. Anil Kumar Bhalla planned the measurement methods and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Harvinder Kaur performed anthropometrical measurements and helped in writing the initial draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saini, S., Gupta, N., Kumar, P. et al. A comparison of two-fingers technique and two-thumbs encircling hands technique of chest compression in neonates. J Perinatol 32, 690–694 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.167

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links