Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition, enteral and parenteral nutrition

The efficacy of protected mealtimes in reducing mealtime interruptions and improving mealtime assistance in adult inpatients in an Australian hospital

Abstract

Background/objectives:

A Protected Mealtimes Programme (PMP) encourages staff, volunteers and visitors to assist patients and cease non-urgent clinical activity during mealtimes. Given the limited evidence available establishing the efficacy of PMP, we compared mealtime interruptions, mealtime assistance received and nutrient intakes before and after PMP implementation in adult inpatients on acute wards.

Subjects/methods:

Data collected on patients at main meals before and after PMP implementation included the following: diet code, level of assistance required and received and by whom, time available to consume the meal, position of the patient and tray during eating, type of interruption and by whom and proportion of foods and drinks consumed. Outcomes pre- and post-PMP implementation were compared using χ2, independent samples t-tests and logistic regression analyses.

Results:

Over two years, 1632 inpatient mealtime observations were conducted (65 (18) years, 51% M). Similar proportions of patients received mealtime assistance when required (84%, P=0.928). Feeding assistance nearly doubled post-PMP implementation (15–29%, P=0.002). Interruptions by nursing staff increased by 8% post-PMP implementation (P<0.001) and represented 61% of all interruptions. Interruptions were less likely to occur pre-PMP implementation (odds ratio, 0.403, 95% confidence interval, 0.301–0.539). Mealtime energy and protein intakes were not changed post-PMP (P=0.979, P=0.482, respectively).

Conclusions:

The PMP increased nursing staff availability at mealtimes and feeding assistance, but also increased mealtime interruptions. This may explain the lack of change in patient energy and protein consumption. Strategies promoting adherence with PMP implementation, such as nurse ward champions or nursing staff driving PMP implementation, may be required to maximise the benefits of protected mealtimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker L, Gout B, Crowe T . Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011; 8: 514–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alison S . Institutional feeding of the elderly. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2002; 5: 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das A, McDougall T, Smithson J, West R . Protecting mealtimes may similarly benefit elderly inpatients [letter to editor]. BMJ 2006; 332: 1334–1335.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sydner Y, Fjellstrom C . Food provision and the meal situation in elderly care-outcomes in different social context. J Hum Nutr Dietet 2005; 18: 45–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal E, Ferguson M, Banks M, Batterham M, Bauer J, Capra S et al. Nutrition care practices in hospital wards: results from the Nutrition Care Day Survey 2010. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Watterson C, Fraser A, Banks M, Isenring E, Miller M, Silvester C et al. Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of malnutrition in adult patients across the continuum of care. Nutr Dietet 2009; 66: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NHS National Patient Safety Agency. Protected Mealtimes Review – Findings and Recommendations report. 2012: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59806.

  8. Hickson M, Connolly A, Whelan K . Impact of protected mealtimes on ward mealtime environment, patient experience and nutrient intake in hospitalised patients. J Hum Nutr Dietet 2011; 24: 370–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuckey C, Bakewell L, Ford G . The effect of a protected mealtime policy on the energy intake and frequency of non-urgent interruptions during mealtimes at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: E526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weekes C . The effect of protected mealtimes on meal interruptions, feeding assistance, energy and protein intake and plate waste. Proc Nutr Soc 2008; 67: E119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Young A, Banks M, Mudge A, Ross L, Daniels L . Protected mealtimes in the Australian context: encouraging, assisting and time to eat. Nutr Dietet 2012; 69: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young A, Mudge A, Banks M, Ross L, Daniels L . Encouraging, assisting and time to EAT: improved nutritional intake for older medical patients receiving protected mealtimes and/or additional nursing feeding assistance. Clin Nutr 2012; 32: 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berrut G, Favreau AM, Dizo E, Tharreau B, Poupin C, Gueringuili M et al. Estimation of calorie and protein intake in aged patients: validation of a method based on meal portions consumed. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: M52–M56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bjornsdottir R, Oskarsdottir E, Thordardottir F, Ramel A, Thorsdottir I, Gunnarsdottir I . Validation of a plate diagram sheet for estimation of energy and protein intake in hospitalized patients. Clin Nutr 2013; S0261-5614: 00278–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forli L, Oppedal B, Skjelle K, Vatn M . Validation of a self-administered form for recording food intake in hospital patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: 929–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradley L, Rees C . Reducing nutritional risk in hospital: The red tray. Nurs Stand 2003; 17: 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xyris. Foodworks 7 2012, Available at: www.xyris.com.au.

  18. Williams P, Walton K . Plate waste in hospitals and strategies for change. Eur e-J Clin Nutr Metab 2011; 6: e235–e241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feldman C, Alonso Briceno-Pinar E, Konas DW, Ruskin M, Toney J, Wunderlich S . A laboratory analysis of total fat content and an examination of portion size of foods served in four New Jersey public middle-school foodservice operations. J Foodservice 2009; 20: 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Queensland Health staff, the Nutrition and Dietetics team, Prince Charles hospital dietitians and inpatients. We also thank Rowena Wilson, Judith Waldburger, Yee Xuan Yet, Kendra Bow and Christine Josephson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Palmer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huxtable, S., Palmer, M. The efficacy of protected mealtimes in reducing mealtime interruptions and improving mealtime assistance in adult inpatients in an Australian hospital. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 904–910 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.126

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links