Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Full-Length Research Report

CODEM Instrument

Developing a Tool to Assess Communication Behavior in Dementia

Published Online:March 04, 2014https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000100

Abstract

Communication and communication behaviors in situational contexts are essential conditions for well-being and quality of life in people with dementia. Measuring methods, however, are limited. The CODEM instrument, a standardized observational communication behavior assessment tool, was developed and evaluated on the basis of the current state of research in dementia care and social-communicative behavior. Initially, interrater reliability was examined by means of videoratings (N = 10 people with dementia). Thereupon, six caregivers in six German nursing homes observed 69 residents suffering from dementia and used CODEM to rate their communication behavior. The interrater reliability of CODEM was excellent (mean κ = .79; intraclass correlation = .91). Statistical analysis indicated that CODEM had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .95). CODEM also showed excellent convergent validity (Pearson’s R = .88) as well as discriminant validity (Pearson’s R = .63). Confirmatory factor analysis verified the two-factor solution of verbal/content aspects and nonverbal/relationship aspects. With regard to the severity of the disease, the content and relational aspects of communication exhibited different trends. CODEM proved to be a reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tool for examining communication behavior in the field of dementia. CODEM also provides researchers a feasible examination tool for measuring effects of psychosocial intervention studies that strive to improve communication behavior and well-being in dementia.

References

  • Barthel, D., Mahoney, F. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 5–61. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bayles, K. A. (2003). Effects of working memory deficits on the communicative functioning of Alzheimer’s dementia patients. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 209–219. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bayles, K., Tomoeda, C. (1994). The Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory. Tucson, AZ: Canyonlands Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bickel, C., Pantel, J., Eysenbach, K., Schröder, J. (2000). Syntactic comprehension deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 71, 432–448. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borckardt, J. J., Nash, M. R., Murphy, M. D., Moore, M., Shaw, D., O’Neil, P. (2008). Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research: A guide to case-based time-series analysis. American Psychologist, 63, 77–95. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bortz, J., Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation: For human and social scientists] (4th ed.). Heidelberg: Springer-Medizin-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buller, N., Ptok, M. (2005). Sprache und Kommunikationsbeeinträchtigungen bei demenziellen Erkrankungen [Language and communication impairments in dementia]. HNO, 53, 177–180. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellis, M. P., Astell, A. J. (2004). The urge to communicate in serve dementia. Brain and Language, 91, 51–52. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Engel, S. (2007). Gestörte Kommunikation bei Demenz aus Sicht der pflegenden Angehörigen: Wie Demenzerkrankungen die Bedingungen gelingender Kommunikation zerstören [Disturbed communication in dementia from the perspective of family caregivers: How dementia destroys the conditions of successful communication]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -psychiatrie, 20, 269–276. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini Mental State Examination: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frattali, C. M., Thompson, C. M., Holland, A. L., Wohl, C. B., Ferketic, M. M. (1995). Functional assessment of communication skills for adults (ASHA FACS). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haberstroh, J., Neumeyer, K., Franzmann, J., Krause, K., Pantel, J. (2011). TANDEM: Communication training for informal caregivers of people with dementia. Aging and Mental Health. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haberstroh, J., Wollstadt, P., Knebel, M., Oswald, F., Schröder, J., Pantel, J. (2013). Need for and challenges facing functional communication as outcome parameter in AD clinical trials. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heun, R., Burkart, M., Wolf, C., Benkert, O. (1998). Effects of presentation rate on word list learning in patients suffering from dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 9, 214–218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kitwood, T., Bredin, K. (1992). A new approach to the evaluation of dementia care. Journal of Advances in Health and Nursing Care, 1(5), 41–60. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kolling, T., Haberstroh, J., Kaspar, R., Pantel, J., Oswald, F., Knopf, M. (2013). Evidence and deployment-based research into care for the elderly using emotional robots: Psychological, methodological and cross-cultural facets. GeroPsych, 26, 83–88. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kuemmel, A., Haberstroh, J. (2011). Kommunikationsfähigkeit demenzkranker Menschen [Communication behavior of people with dementia]. In J. Haberstroh J. PantelEds., Demenz psychosozial behandeln (pp. 269–280). Heidelberg: AKA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Livingston, G., Cooper, C., Woods, J., Milne, A., Katona, C. (2008). Successful aging in adversity: The LASER AD longitudinal study. Journal of Neurology, and Psychiatry, 79, 641–645. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morris, J. N., Hawes, C., Murphy, K., Nonemaker, S. (1995). Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument: User’s manual – Version 2.0. Baltimore: Health Care Financing Administration. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrin, T. (1997). The Positive Response Schedule for Severe Dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 1, 184–191. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perry, R., Hodges, J. R. (1999). Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: A critical review. Brain, 122, 383–404. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Powell, J. A. (2000). Communication interventions in dementia. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 10, 161–168. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Radzey, B., Kuhn, C., Rauh, J. (2001). Qualitätsbeurteilung der institutionellen Versorgung und Betreuung dementiell Erkrankter [Quality assessment of institutional care and support for people with dementia]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Re, S. (2003). Erleben und Ausdruck von Emotionen bei schwerer Demenz [Receiving and expression of emotions in severe dementia]. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Richter, J., Schwarz, M., Eisemann, M., Bauer, B. (2003). Quality of life as an indicator for successful geriatric in patient rehabilitation. A validation study of the “Vienna List.” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37, 265–276. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ripich, D. N. (1994). Functional communication with AD patients: A caregiver training program. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8, 95–109. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rohrer, J. D., Knight, W. D., Warren, J. E., Fox, N. C., Rossor, M. N., Warren, J. D. (2008). Word-finding difficulty: A clinical analysis of the progressive aphasias. Brain, 131, 8–38. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Romero, B., Kurz, A. (1989). Kommunikationswege für Alzheimer Kranke [Communication channels for Alzheimer’s patients]. In V. Roth, (Hrsg.), Kommunikation trotz gestörter Sprache: Aphasie, Demenz, Schizophrenie (S. 129–141). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosen, W. G., Mohs, R. C., Davis, K. L. (1984). A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 1356–1364. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roudier, M., Marcie, P., Grancher, A.-S., Tzortzis, C., Starkstein, S., Boller, F. (1998). Discrimination of facial identity and of emotions in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 154, 151–158. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rüttinger, B., Sauer,J. (2000). Konflikt und Konfliktlösen [Conflict and conflict-solving]. Leonberg: Rosenberger Fachverlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. (2006). Advantages of studying processes in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 16, 433–449. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitz, B., Wiese, B. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 64–96. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Small, J. A., Gutman, G. (2002). Recommended and reported use of communication strategies in Alzheimer caregiving. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 16, 270–278. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., Jackson, D. D. (2007). Some tentative axioms of communication. In C. D. Mortensen, (Ed.), Communication theory (2nd ed., pp. 74–80). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar