Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T03:53:11.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

PH. SPINHOVEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University and the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
J. ORMEL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University and the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
P. P. A. SLOEKERS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University and the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
G. I. J. M. KEMPEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University and the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
A. E. M. SPECKENS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University and the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
A. M. VAN HEMERT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University and the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background. Research on the dimensional structure and reliability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and its relationship with age is scarce. Moreover, its efficacy in determining the presence of depression in different patient groups has been questioned.

Methods. Psychometric properties of the HADS were assessed in six different groups of Dutch subjects (N = 6165): (1) a random sample of younger adults (age 18–65 years) (N = 199); (2) a random sample of elderly subjects of 57 to 65 years of age (N = 1901); (3) a random sample of elderly subjects of 66 years or older (N = 3293); (4) a sample of consecutive general practice patients (N = 112); (5) a sample of consecutive general medical out-patients with unexplained somatic symptoms (N = 169); and (6) a sample of consecutive psychiatric out-patients (N = 491).

Results. Evidence for a two-factor solution corresponding to the original two subscales of the HADS was found, although anxiety and depression subscales were strongly correlated. Homogeneity and test–retest reliability of the total scale and the subscales were good. The dimensional structure and reliability of the HADS was stable across medical settings and age groups. The correlations between HADS scores and age were small. The total HADS scale showed a better balance between sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) in identifying cases of psychiatric disorder as defined by the Present State Examination than the depression subscale in identifying cases of unipolar depression as defined by ICD-8.

Conclusions. The moderate PPV suggests that the HADS is best used as a screening questionnaire and not as a ‘case-identifier’ for psychiatric disorder or depression.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)