ReviewAdvanced airway management during adult cardiac arrest: A systematic review
Introduction
Airway management during cardiac arrest is considered an integral part of cardiac arrest management with potential impact on patient outcome. The traditional approach has usually been initial bag-mask ventilation followed by advanced airway management with either a supraglottic airway or tracheal intubation1, 2 although there is limited supporting evidence for any of these approaches.3 Bag-mask ventilation has been considered to be a relatively simple technique and part of basic life support. However, bag-mask ventilation may be technically difficult with concerns that it might not provide adequate ventilation and oxygenation and there is a risk of aspiration using this approach. Tracheal intubation offers a secure airway and could therefore lower the risk of aspiration of gastric content. However, tracheal intubation might result in interruptions in chest compression and delays in other interventions. Furthermore, tracheal intubation is a skill that requires expertise and experience4 and esophageal intubation (or subsequent dislodgment of the tube) could result in unsuccessful resuscitation. Supraglottic airways are airway devices that are inserted blindly and placed in the hypopharynx to facilitate ventilation.2 These devices are relatively easy to insert and provide a middle-ground intervention between bag-mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. Given that all three approaches are currently being used in clinical practice and considering the theoretical pros and cons for each5, there has been a need for randomized trials to guide clinical practice.
During 2018 a number of randomized clinical trials6, 7, 8 were published addressing advanced airway management during adult cardiac arrest. These trials have included airway management strategies of bag-mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices, and tracheal intubation. This systematic review will inform the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science and treatment recommendations for advanced airway management during adult cardiac arrest.
Section snippets
Protocol and registration
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.9 The PRISMA checklist is provided in the Supplementary Contents. The protocol was prospectively submitted to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42018115556). The protocol is provided in the Supplementary Contents. The review was commissioned by ILCOR.
Eligibility criteria and outcomes
The study question was framed using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison,
Study selection
The search identified 6400 unique titles/abstracts of which 6172 were excluded based on initial review (Kappa = 0.60). Of the 228 full-text articles reviewed, 141 were excluded for various reasons (Kappa = 0.91, Fig. 1). As two additional articles were identified through review of reference lists, a total of 89 articles were included. No studies assessing cost-effectiveness were identified.
Observational studies
Seventy-eight observational studies were included. Nine studies addressed timing of advanced airway
Discussion
In this systematic review on airway management in adult cardiac arrest, which was commissioned by ILCOR to inform an update of international guidelines, a large number of studies were identified. Despite the extensive literature on this topic, we only identified three large randomized clinical trials in OHCA6, 7, 8 and due to heterogeneity between these trials, we were unable to perform any meta-analyses.
More than 70 observational studies have been published on advanced airway management in
Limitations
The overall Kappa for the review of titles/abstracts was relatively low (Kappa = 0.60) which likely reflects difficulties in correctly identifying observational studies of airway management. However, based on subsequent review of reference lists and contact with content experts, we did not identify any additional articles that were missed during the review process and therefore do not believe this is a major limitation. Many of the decisions made in the process of this review are inherently
Conclusion
We identified a large number of studies related to advanced airway management in adult cardiac arrest. However, the majority were at a high risk of bias and heterogeneity across studies precluded any meaningful meta-analyses. Three recently published, large randomized trials on OHCA have improved the certainty of evidence and will help inform future guidelines. Trials addressing advanced airway management during IHCA are lacking.
Funding
This systematic review was funded by the American Heart Association, on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). The following authors received payment from this funding source to complete this systematic review: Lars W. Andersen as Expert Systematic Reviewer. In addition, the St. Michael’s Hospital Health Sciences Library received payment from this funding source to enable David Lightfoot, information specialist to develop and apply the search strategy.
Conflicts of interest
Some of the authors (LWA, AG, MD, JS) and collaborators (JN) have published manuscripts related to advanced airway management. However, none of the authors have any financial conflicts of interests and none of the authors have academic conflicts related to ongoing or planned trials. Authors with identified conflicts of interest as per the guidance of the ILCOR Conflict of Interest Committee were not involved in the decision to include/exclude those articles and did not perform the initial data
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank David Lightfoot, information specialist at the St Michael’s Hospital Health Sciences Library, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute Toronto, ON, Canada, for preparing and conducting the systematic searches. The authors would also like to thank Ewa Gajda, Wolfgang A. Wetsch, Kamran Banan, Marcel Casasola, and Xiaowen Liu for assistance with translation of non-English articles.
References (108)
- et al.
Part 4: Advanced life support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: a systematic review
Resuscitation
(2016) - et al.
Mechanisms linking advanced airway management and cardiac arrest outcomes
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
Time to invasive airway placement and resuscitation outcomes after inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
The association between timing of tracheal intubation and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study
Resuscitation
(2016) - et al.
Time to intubation and survival in prehospital cardiac arrest
Prehosp Emerg Care
(2004) - et al.
Timing of advanced airway management by emergency medical services personnel following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based cohort study
Resuscitation
(2018) - et al.
An assessment of ventilation and perfusion markers in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving mechanical CPR with endotracheal or supraglottic airways
Resuscitation
(2018) - et al.
Modifiable factors associated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Pan-Asian resuscitation outcomes study
Ann Emerg Med
(2018) - et al.
Effects of advanced life support on patients who suffered cardiac arrest outside of hospital and were defibrillated
Am J Emerg Med
(2018)
Survival in ventricular fibrillation with emphasis on the number of defibrillations in relation to other factors at resuscitation
Resuscitation
Comparison of team-focused CPR vs standard CPR in resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: results from a statewide quality improvement initiative
Resuscitation
Association of initial rhythm with neurologically favorable survival in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without a bystander witness or bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Eur J Intern Med
Prehospital endotracheal intubation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: results from the Korean nationwide registry
Am J Emerg Med
Safety and feasibility of the laryngeal tube when used by EMTs during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Am J Emerg Med
Predictors of survival and favorable functional outcomes after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients systematically brought to a dedicated heart attack center (from the Harefield Cardiac Arrest Study)
Am J Cardiol
Effective pre-hospital care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by respiratory disease
Heart Lung Circ
Reply to letter: Re: Use of rapid sequence intubation predicts improved survival among patients intubated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
Airway management and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome in the CARES registry
Resuscitation
Endotracheal intubation versus supraglottic airway insertion in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
Comparison of neurological outcome between tracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device insertion of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a nationwide, population-based, observational study
J Emerg Med
Fate of patients with prehospital resuscitation for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and a high rate of early reperfusion therapy (results from the PREMIR [Prehospital Myocardial Infarction Registry])
Am J Cardiol
Outcome when adrenaline (epinephrine) was actually given vs. not given—post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial
Resuscitation
Out-of-hospital airway management and cardiac arrest outcomes: a propensity score matched analysis
Resuscitation
Effects of bag-mask versus advanced airway ventilation for patients undergoing prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pre-hospital setting
J Emerg Med
Analysis of prehospital care for cardiac arrest in an urban setting in Japan
J Emerg Med
Low chance of survival among patients requiring adrenaline (epinephrine) or intubation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden
Resuscitation
Prehospital cardiac arrest survival and neurologic recovery
J Emerg Med
Pre-hospital tracheal intubation versus esophageal gastric tube airway use: a prospective study
Am J Emerg Med
Prehospital endotracheal tube airway or esophageal gastric tube airway: a critical comparison
Ann Emerg Med
Outcome after cardiac arrest in adults in UK hospitals: effect of the 1997 guidelines
Resuscitation
Prediction of survival from resuscitation: a prognostic index derived from multivariate logistic model analysis
Resuscitation
In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: patient, arrest and resuscitation factors associated with survival
Resuscitation
Esophageal gastric tube airway vs endotracheal tube in prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest
Chest
Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians
Resuscitation
Impact of laryngeal tube use on chest compression fraction during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A prospective alternate month study
Resuscitation
Should laryngeal tubes or masks be used for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients?
Am J Emerg Med.
Randomised comparison of the effectiveness of the laryngeal mask airway supreme, i-gel and current practice in the initial airway management of out of hospital cardiac arrest: a feasibility study
Br J Anaesth
“Resuscitation time bias”—a unique challenge for observational cardiac arrest research
Resuscitation
Experience in organizing the work of a health center
Feldsher Akush
Pragmatic airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac Arrest
JAMA
Effect of bag-mask ventilation vs endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA
Effect of a strategy of initial laryngeal tube insertion vs endotracheal intubation on 72-hour survival in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA
Effect of a strategy of a supraglottic airway device vs tracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on functional outcome: the AIRWAYS-2 randomized clinical trial
JAMA
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ
A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. In: Chandler J, McKenzie J, Boutron I, Welch V, editors. Cochrane Methods
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
BMJ
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
BMJ
Differences in return of spontaneous circulation in early vs late endotracheal intubation among patients in hospital cardiac arrest
J Nepal Health Res Counc
Cited by (44)
The case for causal inference methods in resuscitation research
2023, ResuscitationThe impact of COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest system-of-care: Which survival chain factor contributed the most?
2023, American Journal of Emergency MedicineThe association of delayed advanced airway management and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan
2022, American Journal of Emergency MedicineAssociation between time to advanced airway management and survival during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2022, Resuscitation PlusCitation Excerpt :Our previous observational study indicated that prehospital AAM was not associated with an increased chance of one-month survival compared with bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation.4 In adult OHCA, some studies also suggest that there may not be difference between basic and advanced airway management,13–15 while other studies have indicated that AAM might be associated with poor neurological outcomes or decreased survival.16–18 The effectiveness of AAM may vary depending on the timing when AAM is performed.
- 1
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Advanced Life Support Task Force Collaborators comprise: Clifton W. Callaway, Bernd W. Böttiger, Edison F. Paiva, Tzong-Luen Wang, Brian J. O’Neil, Peter T. Morley, Michelle Welsford, Ian R. Drennan, Joshua C. Reynolds, Robert W. Neumar, Claudio Sandroni, Charles D. Deakin, and Jerry P. Nolan.