Clinical paperAn intervention for cardiac arrest survivors with chronic fatigue: A feasibility study with preliminary outcomes
Introduction
Cardiac arrest (CA) is common and often deadly, resulting in approximately 325,000 deaths annually in North America,1 and only 10% of those who experience an out-of-hospital CA survive.2 Survivors often experience problems with memory, attention, mood, physical ability, fatigue, participation, and quality of life.3, 4, 5, 6 Prolonged complaints of fatigue are common in post-CA adults, with more than half experiencing moderate-to-severe fatigue 3 years post CA.6 Chronic fatigue is a general and sustained feeling of exhaustion or difficulty performing physical and mental activities for days to weeks, which is not resolved by rest.7 Chronic fatigue negatively affects cognitive, physical, and emotional functions, activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life.8, 9, 10 Despite its prevalence and the known negative impact of chronic fatigue,6, 8 no pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for managing fatigue or improving daily activities in people with post-CA chronic fatigue. Therefore, an intervention to improve daily activities, by means of fatigue management in post-CA adults, is urgently needed.
Prior to a clinical trial of any therapy, it is necessary to evaluate the feasibility of delivering interventions and of measuring relevant outcomes.11 The primary aims of this feasibility study were to determine (1) the feasibility of recruiting and retaining participants, (2) the feasibility of delivering an Energy Conservation + Problem Solving Therapy (EC + PST) intervention over the telephone, (3) the acceptability of the intervention to individuals who experience chronic fatigue, and (4) the appropriate outcome measures to capture fatigue impact, activity performance, and participation level in this population. The secondary aim was to evaluate the preliminary intervention effect on outcome measures of fatigue impact, activity performance, and participation level in post-CA adults.
Section snippets
Design
A prospective, pre-post cohort design was used for this study. After the pretest, participants received the EC + PST intervention for up to 4 weeks. The posttest occurred at Week 5.
Participants
Individuals who were at least 3 months post-CA and had chronic fatigue were eligible to participate in the study (Table 1).
EC + PST intervention
Energy Conservation (EC) education promotes fatigue management and improvement in daily activity performance in individuals with chronic fatigue.12 EC incorporates strategies, such as taking rest
Sample characteristics
The mean age for the 18 participants was 53.2 years (SD = 11.3), and the majority were white males (56%). All participants except one had at least a high school education. Most of the participants experienced a shockable (94%), out-of-hospital (67%) CA and were witnessed (61%). A half of the participants received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CAMCI scores indicated that all but three participants were at low risk for mild cognitive impairment: one had a moderate risk, a second a
Discussion
Recruiting participants for this study was feasible, albeit challenging. We recruited 15% of potential participants referred mostly by physicians in the Post-CA Care Service of a tertiary care hospital. Of those referred, 60% declined participation because they were not interested, insufficiently fatigued, or not able to be contacted. Many potential participants who were in the acute stage of post-CA recovery and experienced severe acute fatigue showed interest when the study was described to
Conclusions
The EC + PST intervention was shown to be highly feasible and acceptable to CA survivors with chronic fatigue, and the effectiveness seems promising for reducing the physical and cognitive impact of fatigue in CA survivors. Although all participants successfully completed the study, the use of a standardized cognitive assessment for screening will ensure the inclusion of participants with appropriate cognitive levels. MFIS demonstrated superior performance in measuring the impact of fatigue in
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by American Occupational Therapy Foundation Dissertation Research Grant and University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Development Fund. The study sponsors had no involvement during the study. The authors would like to thank the Post-CA Service at UPMC Presbyterian for the excellent care they provide to these patients.
References (40)
- et al.
Cognitive impairments in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
Neurological and functional status following cardiac arrest: method and tool utility
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
Life after survival: long-term daily functioning and quality of life after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
Development and validation of the Cerebral Performance Categories-Extended (CPC-E)
Resuscitation
(2015) Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited
Behav Therapy
(2004)- et al.
Association between Cerebral Performance Categiry, modified Rankin Scale, and discharge disposition after cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage
Lancet
(1975) - et al.
Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale
Eval Program Plann
(1979) - et al.
Efficacy of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2001) - et al.
Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome
JAMA
(2008)
Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association
Circulation
Quality of survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Arch Intern Med
Physical and mental fatigue in Parkinson's disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment
Drugs Aging
Correlates of fatigue in patients with heart failure
Prog Cardiovasc Nurs
Activities of daily living for old persons in primary health care with chronic heart failure
Scad J Caring Sci
Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research
Clin Trans Sci
One-year follow-up to a randomized controlled trial of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis
IJRR
A randomized clinical trial of energy conservation for patients with cancer-related fatigue
Cancer
Optimizing access to home, community, and work environments
Computer assessment of mild cognitive impairment
Postgrad Med
Cited by (17)
Promising results from a residential rehabilitation intervention focused on fatigue and the secondary psychological and physical consequences of cardiac arrest: The SCARF feasibility study
2022, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Though we did show a small effect for MFI-20 general fatigue the lack of effect on the MFIS could be due to some participants having low initial fatigue scores. An earlier study testing EC + PST22 with CA survivors found the MFIS improved significantly, but only included participants with chronic fatigue with a baseline mean MFIS total score of 50.4 (scale 0–84) compared to 29.4 in our study. Further, the MFIS result could have been affected by the poor completion of final outcomes, with the non-completers reporting a significantly higher baseline MFIS score (39.6) than the completers (24.3) (Table S11, supplementary).
Brain injury after cardiac arrest
2021, The LancetSubjective factors of depressive symptoms, ambulation, pain, and fatigue are associated with physical activity participation in cardiac arrest survivors with fatigue
2021, Resuscitation PlusCitation Excerpt :Participants were 19 adults who had a CA at least three months prior to the study, reported moderate-to-severe fatigue (4 or greater out of a possible range of 1–7) according to the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), 17 had access to a phone, lived within 150 miles of the research center, could comprehend and speak English, demonstrated intact cognition,16 and lived in the community. The rationale for the study eligibility criteria is available elsewhere.16 The median FSS score of 19 participants was 5.56 with IQR of 4.67−6.67.
Brain injury after cardiac arrest: from prognostication of comatose patients to rehabilitation
2020, The Lancet NeurologyCardiopulmonary resuscitation and critical care after cardiac arrest
2018, Cardiac Intensive Care