Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 85, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 1674-1680
Resuscitation

Clinical Paper
Bispectral Index to Predict Neurological Outcome Early After Cardiac Arrest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim of the study

To address the value of continuous monitoring of bispectral index (BIS) to predict neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.

Methods

In this prospective observational study in adult comatose patients treated by therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest we measured bispectral index (BIS) during the first 24 hours of intensive care unit stay. A blinded neurological outcome assessment by cerebral performance category (CPC) was done 6 months after cardiac arrest.

Results

Forty-six patients (48%) had a good neurological outcome at 6-month, as defined by a cerebral performance category (CPC) 1-2, and 50 patients (52%) had a poor neurological outcome (CPC 3-5). Over the 24 h of monitoring, mean BIS values over time were higher in the good outcome group (38 ± 9) compared to the poor outcome group (17 ± 12) (p < 0.001). Analysis of BIS recorded every 30 minutes provided an optimal prediction after 12.5 h, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89, a specificity of 89% and a sensitivity of 86% using a cut-off value of 23. With a specificity fixed at 100% (sensitivity 26%) the cut-off BIS value was 2.4 over the first 271 minutes. In multivariable analyses including clinical characteristics, mean BIS value over the first 12.5 h was a predictor of neurological outcome (p = 6E-6) and provided a continuous net reclassification index of 1.28% (p = 4E-10) and an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.31 (p = 1E-10).

Conclusions

Mean BIS value calculated over the first 12.5 h after ICU admission potentially predicts 6-months neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.

Introduction

Successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest remains a condition with a high mortality rate, even when applying the best medical care to the patients.1, 2, 3, 4 This high mortality of about fifty percent of the patients admitted to the hospital after successful pre-hospital resuscitation is mainly due to neurological impairment consecutive to the anoxic period during cardiac arrest and possibly during reperfusion.5, 6 The ability to predict outcome early after cardiac arrest would represent a major breakthrough towards personalized medicine by adapting the treatment strategy individually to the patient. This early prediction would allow avoiding futile healthcare to patients with irreversible neurological damage while maintaining resources in patients most likely to benefit. However, neurological prognostication of comatose patients after successful resuscitation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains a challenge.7

Several studies have focused on the prognostic value of biomarkers and electrophysiological parameters, but none could demonstrate an accurate prediction of outcome within the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest in hypothermia-treated patients.7, 8, 9, 10 Thus, there is an unmet need for early prediction tools. The actual lapse of time to reliably predict outcome, generally 24, 48 or even 72 hours after cardiac arrest, might be too lengthy if therapeutic decisions on highly invasive acute cardiac assistance have to be taken.11, 12 In previous reports, bispectral index (BIS), a processed electroencephalogram, initially designed to assess the depth of anesthesia, has potential to predict outcome early after cardiac arrest.13, 14, 15, 16, 17 In these studies, either BIS value monitored at a single time-point or the lowest recorded BIS value were considered in prediction analyses.

The aim of this study was to refine the value of BIS as an early predictor of outcome after cardiac arrest. Using serial measurements of BIS over the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU, we determined BIS cut-off values and time of recording providing optimal prediction of outcome.

Section snippets

Patients

We included all successfully resuscitated adult cardiac arrest patients enrolled in a prospective local registry admitted from February 2009 to June 2013 to our general ICU. Part of the patients have been involved in previous studies, although none of these addressed the prognostic value of continuous BIS monitoring.16, 18, 19, 20 All patients were older than 18 years, unconscious (Glasgow coma score below or equal to 8) and received induced hypothermia at 33 °C with sedation and neuromuscular

Patients

Over the four year enrollment period, 121 patients were admitted to our ICU after cardiac arrest. Twenty-five patients had to be excluded (Figure 1). Thus, 96 patients were enrolled in this study. Median time from ROSC to first BIS measurement was 197 [166–246] minutes and time to target temperature was 300 [237–391] minutes. Median doses of midazolam, fentanyl and cisatracurium were respectively: 0.16 [0.12-0.25] mg/kg/h, 1.69 [0.99-2.4] μg/kg/h and 0.11 [0.08-0.12] mg/kg/h. There was no

Discussion

This study supports the hypothesis that continuous monitoring and calculation of mean BIS during the first 24 hours after ICU admission allows an early and accurate prediction of outcome. We determined cut-off values for BIS and duration of monitoring that allow optimal prediction. BIS monitoring had an additive prognostic value to standard clinical parameters.

Patients with good and poor neurological outcome differed in terms of age, time to ROSC, illness severity score (SAPS II) and initial

Conclusions

Calculation of the mean BIS value over the first 12.5 hours after ICU admission might be another potential predictor of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Further studies are warranted to confirm and refine these findings.

The data of this paper do not overlap with previous publications and the manuscript, including related data, figures and tables, have not been published previously and the manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere.

Conflicts of interest: None.

Financial support:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Jacqueline Kieffer for her meticulous work for data extraction. We thank Loredana Jacobs, Mélanie Vausort, Christelle Nicolas and Bernadette Leners for technical assistance.

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Culture, Higher Education and Research of Luxembourg.

References (30)

  • Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest

    The New England journal of medicine

    (2002)
  • S.A. Bernard et al.

    Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia

    The New England journal of medicine.

    (2002)
  • V. Lemiale et al.

    Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: the relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort

    Intensive care medicine.

    (2013)
  • M. Oddo et al.

    Predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest

    Current opinion in critical care.

    (2011)
  • C. Adrie et al.

    Predicting survival with good neurological recovery at hospital admission after successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the OHCA score

    European heart journal.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (33)

    • The validation of simplified EEG derived from the bispectral index monitor in post-cardiac arrest patients

      2018, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Unfortunately, our time point of validation was situated approximately three days after CA. As previous studies showed that the prognostic power of EEG lies within the first 24 h, we acknowledge that the prognostic value of simplified BIS EEG warrants further examination in a similar time window [14,15,35–37]. Aside from experienced neurophysiologists, treating physicians should also be capable of interpreting simplified EEG traces on the BIS monitor as they can play a prominent role in the early identification of epileptic activity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.009.

    View full text