Clinical paperCompressions during defibrillator charging shortens shock pause duration and improves chest compression fraction during shockable out of hospital cardiac arrest☆
Introduction
Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continues to challenge Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems.1, 2, 3 With the advent of the 2010 American Heart Association-International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (AHA-ILCOR) guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), interest has focused on improving survival through improvements in CPR.4, 5 Chest compression fraction (CCF), compression rate and depth, peri-shock pause duration and chest compression release velocity have all been associated with improved survival to hospital discharge from OHCA.6, 7, 8, 9 Shorter peri-shock pause duration and in particular pre-shock pause duration have as well been associated with improved neurological outcome from OHCA.10 Defibrillator mode (automatic or manual mode) is known to have a significant impact on pre-shock pause duration as a result of the mandatory time required for both defibrillator analysis and charging in automatic mode.10, 11 A variety of techniques have been shown to decrease pre-shock pause duration when employed by providers in a simulated resuscitation environment.12 Chest compressions performed during the defibrillator charging phase (CDC) is one technique that has been suggested in an attempt to mitigate the impact of defibrillator charging time on pre-shock pause duration. Edelson et al.13 previously have demonstrated significant improvements in pre-shock pause duration by employing CDC in the inhospital environment. No previous studies have examined the impact of CDC performed by paramedics during OHCA. If CDC consistently shortens pre-shock pause duration, it may have significant impact on both termination of ventricular fibrillation and survival from OHCA. We therefore sought to explore the impact of CDC on shock pause duration and CPR quality metrics during shockable OHCA.
Section snippets
Setting and design
The study took place in the Regions of Peel and Halton in the province of Ontario, Canada. The regions cover an area of 2040 km2 and have a combined population of 1.6 million people. EMS responds to a volume of 100,000 emergency calls per year. Prehospital medical care is provided by advanced care paramedics (full advanced life support skills) and primary care paramedics (basic life support skills with the addition of a small number of medications and manual defibrillation). Both agencies are
Study population
Patients eligible for this study included those 18 years of age and older who sustained non-traumatic OHCA with a first EMS rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) for which CPR process data for at least one shock was obtained. The initial rhythm was determined to be VF/VT if the initial rhythm was interpreted as VF/VT by the initial EMS provider and a shock was provided. Patients were excluded if they received public access defibrillation before EMS
Measurement
CPR process data from all eligible resuscitations were reviewed and assessed for duration of pre- and post-shock pauses, CCF, compression rate and compression depth up to and including only the third shock, to minimize confounding by other resuscitation interventions (intubation, intravenous epinephrine or intravenous antiarrythmics). Pre-shock pause was defined as the time interval between chest compression cessation (as detected in the impedance channel waveform) and shock delivery.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to assess whether baseline characteristics remained consistent across study cohorts (CDC and non-CDC). The relationship between CDC and all outcome measures (median shock pause duration, CPR quality metrics, ROSC, and survival to hospital discharge) was calculated by univariate regression analysis using a chi-squared test. To ensure our findings were robust and not cofounded by the limitation of our analysis to the first three shocks of each resuscitation, we
Results
Fig. 1 displays a CONSORT diagram of all cases included in the study. Of 747 treated, unwitnessed cardiac arrest resuscitations, 20% had an initial arrest rhythm of VF/VT. Of those 149, CPR process data was missing on 20 cases leaving 129 for analysis. Seventy (54%) of these cases were identified as CDC cases.
Table 1 compares the baseline characteristics of both study cohorts. No significant differences in Utstein variables or resuscitation duration were noted between the two cohorts. Shocks
Discussion
To our knowledge, this study represents the only out-of-hospital study to date examining the relationship between CDC and shock pause duration, CPR quality metrics and clinical outcome measures. Study data analysis demonstrated significant improvement in both shock pause durations (pre- and peri-) and CCF. These improvements persisted regardless of whether the analysis was performed on a patient based or shock based analysis. As expected, there was no significant association between chest
Conclusion
Compressions during defibrillator charging may shorten shock pause duration and improves chest compression fraction in shockable OHCA. Further study with a larger sample size is required to determine the impact of this technique on clinical outcomes from shockable OHCA.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Cheskes has received speaking honorarium from Zoll Medical. Dr. Cheskes has received grant funding as Co PI, Toronto site, Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Dr. Morrison has received grant funding as PI, Toronto site, Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. No other grant disclosures.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of all paramedics of both the Region of Peel Paramedic Service and Halton EMS. Research in the pre-hospital setting would not be possible without the tireless efforts of their paramedics.
References (22)
- et al.
Outcome of CPR in a large metropolitan area: where are the survivors?
Ann Emerg Med
(1991) - et al.
Charging the defibrillator before rhythm check reduces hands-off time during CPR: a randomised simulation study
Resuscitation
(2012) - et al.
Safety and efficacy of defibrillator charging during ongoing chest compressions: a multi-center study
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Rationale, development and implementation of the resuscitation outcomes consortium epistry-cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
Minimizing pre- and post-defibrillation pauses increases the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Is external defibrillation an electric threat for bystanders?
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
Task force of the European Society of Cardiology on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Statistics in Europe. The burden of cardiovascular diseases mortality in Europe
Eur Heart J
(1997) - et al.
Resuscitation outcomes consortium investigators regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome
JAMA
(2008) - et al.
Part 2: international collaboration in resuscitation science: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations
Circulation
(2010) - et al.
Measuring progress in resusciation: it's time for a better tool
Circulation
(2006)
What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation?
Crit Care Med
Cited by (24)
Methods for calculating ventilation rates during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2023, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Prior studies have characterized ventilation quality over the entirety of resuscitation without considering shorter but potentially important episodes of hypo- or hyperventilation.3 Previously we demonstrated the feasibility of using the continuous capnography signal from modern portable cardiac monitors to characterize ventilation rate during OHCA.6–12 Important considerations in the analysis of the capnogram include the methods used to calculate the ventilation rate and the resulting estimates of hypo- and hyperventilation.
Airway strategy and ventilation rates in the pragmatic airway resuscitation trial
2022, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Prior studies characterizing ventilation parameters such as ventilation rate and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) levels have relied upon discrete measurements or manual assessment of resuscitation records.4 Modern portable cardiac monitors enable continuous real-time recordings of resuscitation parameters such as thoracic impedance, chest compression depth and ETCO2 levels.7–13 We previously demonstrated the utility of advanced automated signal processing techniques in characterizing chest compressions delivered to OHCA patients.14–16
Effect of a resuscitation quality improvement programme on outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2021, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :In particular, our median pre-shock pause of 5 s is considerably lower than what is possible with semi-automatic defibrillation,21–23 and this may be an important factor contributing to the observed increases in survival.24 Some EMS systems have shown that median pre-shock pauses of less than 3 s are possible in manual mode,11,25,26 and this may be an area for future improvement in our system. We made a number of discrete changes to resuscitation practice which may have also contributed to our results.
Anticipatory manual defibrillator charging during advanced life support: A scoping review
2020, Resuscitation PlusOptimizing CPR performance with CPR coaching for pediatric cardiac arrest: A randomized simulation-based clinical trial
2018, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :CPR Coaches were trained in a standardized fashion, within 48 h prior to the CPA scenario. Coaches were instructed to: (i) point at the CPR feedback output on the defibrillator; (ii) provide corrective verbal feedback based on CPR feedback output (e.g. “press harder, aim for 5.5 cm”); (iii) provide positive feedback for good CPR performance; (iv) coordinate the appropriate compression:ventilation ratio prior to intubation; (v) coordinate key tasks to reduce pause duration (e.g. “in 15 s we will pause to check rhythm, pulse and switch compressors”); and (vi) remind CPR providers to deliver continuous compressions during intubation attempt or defibrillator charging [18,19]. Control arm resuscitation teams had the same team composition and size, but instead of a CPR Coach there was an extra bedside provider.
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.05.001.